Fixed Pattern Signal fluctuations in Si pixel detectors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Fixed Pattern Signal fluctuations in Si pixel detectors

Description:

Correction map calculated using 128V detector bias data. September 2002 ... Magnitude of fluctuations decreases with detector bias ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: ltlu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fixed Pattern Signal fluctuations in Si pixel detectors


1
Fixed Pattern Signal fluctuations in Si pixel
detectors
  • L. Tlustos, D. Davidson, M. Campbell, E.
    Heijne, B. Mikulec

2
Outline
  • Flatfield studies with Medipix1 chip and
    underdepleted and depleted standard high
    resistivity Si p on n sensors
  • Charge sharing

3
Flatfield Correction
  • Additive correction
  • Multiplicative correction

4
Motivation
  • Signal to noise ratio SNR is a crucial parameter
    for image quality and resolution
  • Poisson statistics of the incident beam marks the
    upper limit of the achievable SNR
  • SNR of Medipix1 approaches Poisson limit when
    flatfield correction is applied
  • Trying to understand the sources of
    inhomogeneities in the raw data in order to
    improve image quality

SNR
theory corrected uncorrected
Normalized acquisition time
5
Flatfield Measurements
  • Large number of flatfield acquisitions (150-1000)
  • Count rate 10kHz/pixel
  • accumulated total counts 2.5 106 counts/pixel
  • with
  • 3 Medipix1 assemblies
  • Detector bias ranging from 4V-128V
  • Using
  • Mo tube, 30um Mo filter, 20keV, 28kV
  • W tube, 125um Al filter, 1cm PMMA, 20kV, 30keV

6
Flatfield Measurements
Spectra calculated following J M Boone, A E
Chavez Med Phys 23, 1997 J M Boone, T R Fewell,
R J Jennings Med Phys 24, 1997
7
Number of counts - Vbias
  • Plateau of count rate is a measure for depletion
    voltage
  • Normalized number of counts increase with energy
    content of the beam ? charge sharing

8
Results 10C3_G8
  • Detector bias voltage 3,4,8,12,16,24,32,48,64,80,
    100,128V
  • Correction map calculated using 128V detector
    bias data

9
Results 10C3_G8
Single detached pixel
10
Results 11B6_5J
  • Detector bias voltage 3,4,8,12,16,24,32,48,64,80,
    100V
  • Correction map calculated using 100V detector
    bias data

11
Results 11B6_5J
12
10C3_G8 map 4V corrected
13
10C3_G8 map 8V corrected
14
10C3_G8 map 12V corrected
15
10C3_G8 map 16V corrected
16
10C3_G8 map 24V corrected
17
10C3_G8 map 32V corrected
18
(No Transcript)
19
11B6_5J map 12V corrected
20
11B6_5J map 16V corrected
21
11B6_5J map 24V corrected
22
11B6_5J map 32V corrected
23
11B6_5J map 48V corrected
24
11B6_5J map 64V corrected
25
(No Transcript)
26
10C3_G8 map profile 4-16V
3x3 mean filter
Raw data
27
10C3_G8 map profile 4-32V
3x3 mean filter
Raw data
28
10C3_G8 map profile 32-128V
3x3 mean filter
Raw data
29
11B6_5J map profile 4-32V
3x3 mean filter
Raw data
30
11B6_5J map profile 32-100V
3x3 mean filter
Raw data
31
(No Transcript)
32
Conclusions (1)
  • Low detector bias wave pattern clearly visible,
    ascribed to bulk doping inhomogeneities causing
    fluctuations of the width of the depletion layer
  • Magnitude of fluctuations decreases with detector
    bias
  • But small variations remain even at high bias
    voltages, may be due to local variations of the
    pixel geometry

33
Detached Pixel 10C3_G8
34
Detached Pixel 10C3_G8
  • Count decreases with detector bias
  • Generated charge collected by adjacent pixels

Normalized count
Vbias V
35
Detached Pixel 10C3_G8
  • Sum of map weights of the 4 direct neighboring
    pixels lt 5
  • Field not strong enough to redistribute all the
    chare generated

weight
Vbias V
36
Conclusions
  • Fixed pattern fluctuations are consistent with
    bulk doping inhomogeneities originating in Float
    Zone technique of crystal growth
  • Inhomogeneities can influence the charge
    collection properties of sensor
  • Fixed pattern fluctuations remain even in
    overdepletion and affect the obtained resolution
    in imaging applications ? correction is necessary
  • Implications also to optimization of resolution
    in particle tracking
  • Effects could also be used to study material
    properties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com