Chapter 8 GLOBAL CRITERION METHOD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 8 GLOBAL CRITERION METHOD

Description:

Max Zl = fl(x); l = 1, ..., K. S.t. gi(x) ~ 0; i = 1, 2, ..., m. x 0. Where ~ hold for , or ... Step 2: construct a payoff table. x1* x2* Z1 130 100. Z2 100 250 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Arn8157
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 8 GLOBAL CRITERION METHOD


1
Chapter 8 GLOBAL CRITERION METHOD
2
Overview
  • An MODM technique
  • No priori articulation of preference information
  • Poineering works
  • M.E. Salukvadze (1971) distance minimization
    concept
  • C.L.Hwang (1972) minimization of the total
    mean-square loss
  • P.L. Yu (1973) minimizing Group regret
  • Hwang and Yu have been credited with originating
    the ideal distance minimization method or also
    known as the Global Criterion Method

3
Global Criterion Method
  • Original MODM Problem
  • Max Zl fl(x) l 1, , K
  • S.t. gi(x) 0 i 1, 2, , m
  • x 0
  • Where hold for ?, ? or
  • Individual optimum fl(xl) l 1, , K. x is
    different for each j.

4
Payoff Matrix
5
Global Criterion Method
  • The method of global criterion for the above
    vector maximization problem (VMP) solves the
    problem
  • General formulation

6
Global Criterion Method Comments
  • F is in a ratio form no worry of dimensions
  • The best solution chosen for the VMP will
    differ greatly according to the value of p
    chosen. Some suggested p 1, some p 2 for the
    Global Criterion. p 1 implies equal
    importance (weights) for all these deviations,
    while p 2 implies that these deviations are
    weighted proportionately with the largest
    deviation having the largest weight
  • p is a DMs judgment

7
Example
  • A company makes two kinds of products. Product A
    is of high quality and product B is of lower
    quality. The respective profits are 0.4 and 0.3
    per product. Each product A requires twice as
    much time as a product B, and if all products
    were of type B, the company could make 500 per
    day. The supply of material is sufficicent for
    only 400 product units per day (both A and B
    combined). The problem assumes that all the
    products for types A and B the factory can make
    could be sold and that the best customer of the
    company wishes to have as many as possible of
    product type A. The manager realizes that two
    objectives (1) the maximization of profit, and
    (2) the maximum production of product type A,
    should be considered in scheduling the production.

8
Example Comments/additional information on the
problem
  • The DM is unapproachable/could not be made
    available
  • The management gives the problem to the analyst
    and asked him to come up with a reasonable
    solution
  • The objectives are of different dimensions
  • The global criterion method appears to be an
    appropriate approach

9
Example The model formulation
  • Maximize Z1 0.4x1 0.3x2
  • Maximize Z2 x1
  • S.t. x1 x2 400 (material supply)
  • 2x1 x2 500 (capacity)
  • x1, x2 0
  • Where x1 and x2 number of units of product
    types A and B, respectively

10
Example
  • Step 1 Obtain the ideal solutions
  • Maximize Z1 0.4x1 0.3x2
  • S.t. x ? X
  • This is a LP problem whose ideal solution is x1
  • (100, 300) and Z1 130 at point B in the figure
  • Maximize Z2 x1
  • S.t. x ? X
  • This is again a LP problem whose ideal solution
    is
  • x2 (250, 0) and Z2 250 at point C in the
    figure

11
Example
  • Step 2 construct a payoff table
  • x1 x2
  • Z1 130 100
  • Z2 100 250
  • Step 3 obtain the preferred solution
  • Case 1 p 1
  • The solution to this LP problem is given by x1
    250,
  • x2 0, Z1 100, Z2 250 which is point C
    again.
  • Disadvantage when p 1, the preferred solution
    is one of the vertices
  • Advantage still a LP problem

12
Example
  • Case 2 p 2
  • This is a NLP problem. When solved using the
  • sequential unconstrained minimization technique
  • (SUMT), the solution is point D
  • Disadvantage for p gt 1 it is difficult for the
    DM to decide what value of p to use especially
    when he has differential preferences on the
    objectives.
  • Difficult to solve
  • F becomes nonlinear

13
Maximum Effectiveness Method
  • An MODM technique
  • Reference V.V., Khomenyuk, appears to have been
    the originator of the method
  • Principle the method maximizes the minimum
    attainment by any objective of its respective
    ideal value by making use of the natural
    normalization
  • The lth objectives relative attainment of its
    ideal value is denoted ?l
  • Assuming all objectives are being maximized, ?l,
    is defined as

14
Example
500 400 300 200 100
x1 x2 400
2x1 x2 500
B
D
C
0 100 200 250 300 400 500
15
Maximum Effectiveness Method
  • The method is also known as the ?-criteria
    optimization
  • The final model is
  • In the above model solve for x ? compromise
  • solution
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com