Big%20Brother/Big%20Sister%20Program%20of%20Austin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Big%20Brother/Big%20Sister%20Program%20of%20Austin

Description:

Research. Survey. If budget allows, conduct additional survey specifically for current members to ... questionnaire with focused questions geared towards issues ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: jacquel70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Big%20Brother/Big%20Sister%20Program%20of%20Austin


1
Big Brother/Big Sister Program of Austin
2
The Problem
  • In order to properly serve Big Brothers Big
    Sisters (BBBS), we must evaluate methodologies,
    explain the data collected and offer
    recommendations for future and promotional
    efforts given the budget constraints.  

3
Agenda
  • Consider the critical factors
  • Evaluate previous research methodology
  • What does the data tell us?
  • What do we recommend?
  • Conclusion
  • Questions

4
The Critical Factors
  • BBBS is a nonprofit organization with limited
    funds that only allows for small advertising
    budget.
  • Its advertising message lacks focus
  • BBBS does not want to spend any more money on PSAs

5
The Critical Factors (cont.)
  • Popular misconception of the type of children
    enrolled in the program
  • Poor program portrayal of the Big Brother/Sister
    role
  • Insufficient amount of volunteers, specifically
    male

6
The Critical Factors (cont.)
  • In order to properly set goals and evaluate past
    programs, BBBS commissioned a local research firm
    to suggest problems and opportunities to the
    board.
  • Ineffective overall research methods

7
The Critical Factors (cont.)
  • Although public misconceptions were identified
    through research, the board of directors did not
    want to change the existent public service
    announcements.

8
Evaluation of MethodologyFocus Groups
  • Strengths
  • Discovers the programs public perception
  • Offers qualitative information
  • Provides starting point for further research

9
Evaluation of MethodologyFocus Groups
  • Limitations
  • Can not be projected to general population
  • Moderator biases
  • Programs diversity is not represented accurately
    in focus group participants
  • Not enough focus groups conducted

10
Evaluation of MethodologyTelephone Questionnaire
  • Strengths
  • Provides quantitative information on several
    subjects
  • Questions well structured
  • Questions arranged in logical order
  • Offers large range of information

11
Evaluation of MethodologyTelephone Questionnaire
  • Limitations
  • Respondent external factors (i.e.. Increased
    wear-out, absence, multitasking)
  • Facilitator biases
  • Too long
  • Lack of tailoring of survey to respondent
  • Target audience should be better focused- Instead
    of random dialing the questionnaire participants,
    it would be more effective if a screening process
    were enacted in order to offer more effective

12
The Story
  • Data shows the participating kids are incorrectly
    seen as hoodlums, therefore not desirable.
  • Perception of Big Brothers and Big Sisters as
    substitute parents which is contrary to BBBSs
    purpose
  • Contradicting perception of the ideal volunteer
    as a college student with no spare time
  • Overestimates concerning the amount of time,
    money, effort involved

13
The Story (cont)
  • Message is vague, melancholy, lacks focus and a
    target audience
  • Cross-sex matching elicited a mixed response.
    Although most didnt find a problem with it,
    matching Big Brothers with Little Sisters
    received negative reactions and vice versa.
    Among top concerns were molestation fears and
    femininity worries.

14
RecommendationsResearch
  • Focus Groups
  • Conduct a focus group of current members and ask
    for recommendations on how to spark interest in
    potential volunteers
  • Develop stricter screening process to ensure a
    diverse focus group
  • If budget allows, conduct more focus groups to
    get a better sample of population

15
RecommendationsResearch
  • Survey
  • If budget allows, conduct additional survey
    specifically for current members to help form
    message
  • Shorten questionnaire with focused questions
    geared towards issues raised by data illustration

16
RecommendationsResearch
  • Additional Research if budget allows
  • In-depth Interviews with Big Brother/Sister and
    Little Brother/Sister to generate campaign ideas

17
RecommendationsPromotion
  • Message
  • All new PSAs should focus on friendship,
    excitement and cheer vs. parenting
  • Reposition kids as kids not criminals
  • Must include a call to action
  • Tone
  • Not overdramatic
  • No dark appeals such as fear, loneliness, or
    sadness

18
RecommendationsPromotion
  • Events
  • To reach a large audience, hold events with
    sponsors and affiliates to raise awareness of new
    brand image.

19
RecommendationsTargeting
  • Target your messages towards niche markets
  • Participation as part of degree requirements for
    education and social work majors
  • Negotiate partnership with teach for America
    hopefuls
  • Churches as additional point of contact for
    advertising and recruitment
  • Continue corporate sponsorships and develop a
    climate of cooperation with their employees

20
Conclusion
  • In conclusion, after evaluating BBBSs current
    research methods and findings, we suggest a
    two-fold strategy involving the refinement of
    current research efforts and launching new,
    inexpensive techniques in order to collect more
    conclusive data. With left over budget, the new
    BBBS campaign should focus on motivation and
    friendships with an up-beat tone.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com