Istanbul - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Istanbul

Description:

... Internet WDM optical networks become a natural choice for ... Simulation model of a core node in a Burst-Switched network. OBS Modeling & Simulation ctd. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: E83
Category:
Tags: become | istanbul | model

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Istanbul


1
Some Modeling and Simulation Problemsrelated
toswitching in all-optical networks
Ercan Topuz Istanbul Technical University
2
Switching in Optical Networks
  • Circuit Switching
  • Optical Internet
  • Optical Burst Switching (OBS)
  • OBS Modeling Simulation
  • Conclusions

3
Circuit Switching
  • As traffic increases rapidly in the Internet WDM
    optical networks become a natural choice for the
    backbone.
  • Speeds in the order of Tb/s have been
    demonstrated with Dense Wavelength Division
    Multiplexing (DWDM) techniques to provide ca. 100
    Light Paths (LP Wavelength Channel) on a single
    fiber each carrying data at 10-20 Gb/s.
  • Current systems employ circuit switching in the
    optical domain. LPs between end users are
    established via Optical Add-Drop Multiplexers
    (OADM) and Cross-Connects (OXC).

4
Circuit Switching ctd.
  • N fibers, M LPs

.......
Switch Fabric
.......
O E
O E
Drop
Add
5
Circuit Switching ctd.
  • Optical-Electrical-Optical (O-E-O) Conversion at
    each node.
  • Fine grain processing in the electronic domain.
  • Advantages
  • Fresh copy generated at each node.
  • Full QoS Management capability.
  • Disadvantages
  • Dependence on speed/protocol (Opaque).
  • Inefficient utilization of resources.
  • Speed limitations imposed by available electronic
    processing capabilities.

6
Optical Internet
  • IP-over-WDM seems promising
  • IP provides common platform for services
  • WDM offers almost unlimited bandwidth and
    throughput

7
Optical Internet ctd.
  • OPTIONS
  • Optical Packet Switching (OPS).
  • Optical Burst Switching (OBS).

Packet Switching
Burst Switching
Wavelength Switching
8
Optical Internet ctd.
  • LIMITATIONS
  • 1. Optical Processing techniques at
    sub-wavelength granularity and high speed have
    not yet matured
  • 2. Optical buffering.
  • Common approach is to use fiber delay lines
    (FDL)
  • Bulky (100m fiber for delaying a packet of 10kb
    at 20Gb/s)
  • Inflexible (A tree of FDL required for step-wise
    control)
  • Random access not possible.
  • PRESENT STATUS
  • OPS at early experimental stage Dorren H.J.S.
    et.al, IEEE, JLT Jan.2003, pp.3-12.
  • OBS several versions successfully demonstrated
    http//www.utdallas .eduvinod/obs.htm .
    Near-Mid term implementation feasible.

9
Optical Burst Switching
  • ADVANTAGES
  • Transparent
  • Efficient utilization of resources
  • DISADVANTAGES
  • Faces two technological bottlenecks Processing
    speed and buffering.
  • Noise accumulation
  • No/limited QoS management.

10
Optical Burst Switching ctd.
Differentiate between Edge Nodes and Core Nodes
Edge Nodes - Electronic processing. Combine
packets (common destination/priority etc.) to
form bursts. Control data sent over different
channel with time offset. Core Nodes -Fast
optical switching with l conversion One pass
reservation Buffer not inherently needed.
11
Optical Burst Switching ctd.
OBS Architecture
12
Optical Burst Switching ctd.
Advantages
  • Decoupling of header processing and data
    forwarding
  • allows sophisticated processing of control
    information,
  • data can stay in optical domain resulting in
    high throughput,
  • transparent independent of client layer.
  • One-pass reservation saves time and bandwidth
  • Scalability and flexibility by sharing of
    wavelengths
  • QoS support in the optical layer

13
Optical Burst Switching ctd.
Service Differentiation
14
OBS Modeling Simulation
Control and data channels can be modeled
separately
An example Simulation of Optical Burst
Switching Protocol and Physical Layers , A.
Louridas,et.al. OBS network using the
Just-Enough-Time (JET) protocol model is created
by implementing multiple simple n-channel network
models in OPNET Modeler. The Physical Layer
performance of an OBS network is investigated
using VPItransmissionMaker, and performance
predictions based on realisable technology and
dependent on parameters such as distance between
nodes and number of nodes are obtained.
15
OBS Modeling Simulation ctd.
PROTOCOL IMPLEMENTATION OF OBS
Simulation model of a core node in a
Burst-Switched network.
16
OBS Modeling Simulation ctd.
OBS PHYSICAL LAYER MODELLING
OBS network Physical Layer representation in VPI
Systems software one optical core node
17
OBS Modeling Simulation ctd.
OBS network Physical Layer representation in VPI
Systems software one optical core node
Received eye diagrams for two scenarios.
18
Optical Burst Switching ctd.
  • Hybrid techniques can be used to cut down
    simulation time
  • An example An effective Method for Blocking
    Performance Analysis of WDM All-Optical Networks,
    J.Xiong, et.al, IEEE JLT, June 2003,
    pp.1421-1435.
  • Step 1 - A parametric representation in the form
    of a rational approximation function is derived
    for the blocking probability in wavelength routed
    optical networks.
  • Step 2- The parameters of the function are
    determined using DES for (unrealisticaly) high
    blocking probabilities (BP). (
  • Step 3- Validate via few DES runs in the low
    BP region.

Fast )
19
Conclusions
  • All Optical Networks (OAN) utilizing OPS and OBS
    will most probably be implemented in near future
    as backbone networks.
  • OAN presents challenging modeling and simulation
    problems
  • Very high data rates (Tb/s)
  • Large networks
  • Hybrid approaches needed (COST 285 ?)

20
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com