SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING

Description:

The Next Information Revolution Can Institutional Repositories and Open Access ... Institutionally defined: Content generated by institutional community ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: rickj171
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING


1
SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING ACADEMIC RESOURCES
COALITION SPARC EUROPE
  • The Next Information Revolution Can
    Institutional Repositories and Open Access
    Transform Scholarly Communications?
  • David Prosser SPARC Europe Director
  • (david.prosser_at_bodley.ox.ac.uk)

2
The Global Journals Problem
  • UK 1989-99
  • Journals unit cost 364
  • Faculty salaries 60

Australia 1986-98 Serials unit cost 474 Serials
expenditure 263 Titles purchased - 37
3
The Situation Today
  • Dissatisfaction with the current scholarly
    communication model
  • Even the wealthiest institution cannot purchase
    access to all the information that all of its
    researchers require
  • Many publishers charge extra for online access
    so causing more pressure on budgets
  • Site-licenses and consortia deals have helped,
    but mainly in the richest countries

4
Past Library Strategies
  • Journal cancellations reduced book acquisitions
  • Improved document delivery
  • Cooperative collection development
  • Consortial purchasing national site licensing
  • The underlying problem persists.

5
Aggregated system
  • Scholarly publishing comprises four functions
  • Current model
  • integrates these functions in journals

6
Unlocking opportunities
  • Opportunities for expanded access and new uses
    offered by
  • ever-expanding networking
  • evolving digital publishing technologies and
    business models
  • Better ways to handle increasing volume of
    research generated
  • Technology offers the chance for research and
    library communities to take back control of
    scholarly communication

7
What are institutional repositories?
  • Essential elements
  • Institutionally defined Content generated by
    institutional community
  • Scholarly content preprints and working papers,
    published articles, enduring teaching materials,
    student theses, data-sets, etc.
  • Cumulative perpetual preserve ongoing access
    to material
  • Interoperable open access free, online, global

8
Why institutional repositories?
  • For the Individual
  • Provide a central archive of their work
  • Increase the dissemination and impact of their
    research
  • Acts as a full CV
  • For the Institution
  • Increases visibility and prestige
  • Acts as an advertisement to funding sources,
    potential new faculty and students, etc.
  • For Society
  • Provide access to the worlds research
  • Ensures long-term preservation of institutes
    academic output

9
The Four Functions
10
Certification
  • Certification gives
  • Authors Validation of their work (important for
    promotion and grant applications)
  • Readers Quality filter
  • Journals would provide peer review services for a
    sub-set of the material in the Institutional
    Repositories
  • The journals would give a quality stamp to the
    research presented in the Repositories
  • Journals should be open access

11
Open Access
  • What is it?
  • Call for free, unrestricted access on the
    public internet to the literature that scholars
    give to the world without expectation of payment.
  • Why?
  • Widen dissemination, accelerate research, enrich
    education, share learning among rich poor
    nations, enhance return on taxpayer investment in
    research.
  • How?
  • Use existing funds to pay for dissemination, not
    access.

12
Theory Into Practice- Institutional Repositories
  • Eprints.org Southampton produced software
  • D-Space MIT
  • CDSWare CERN
  • SHERPA UK
  • DARE The Netherlands
  • SPARC Resources
  • (http//www.arl.org/sparc/core/index.asp?pagem0)

13
Theory Into Practice- Institutional Repositories
Australia National University Universite de Montreal
Aalborg University Universitat Essen
Universitat Stuttgart Utrecht University
Lunds Universitet CERN
National University of Ireland University of Bath
University of Glasgow University of Nottingham
California Digital Library Caltech
MIT Academy of Sciences, Belarus
14
Theory Into Practice- Open Access
  • SPARC open access journal partners
  • Algebraic and Geometric Topology
  • BioMed Central
  • Documenta Mathematica
  • Calif. Digital Library eScholarship
  • Geometry Topology
  • Journal of Insect Science
  • Journal of Machine Learning Research
  • New Journal of Physics

15
Theory Into Practice- Open Access
  • Two new journals from the Public Library of
    Science
  • PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine
  • Indian Academy of Sciences has made their 11
    journals available free online
  • Lund Directory of Open Access Journals
    (http//www.doaj.org/) about 350 peer-reviewed
    open access journals

16
What Libraries Can Do
  • Self-archiving
  • Maintain institutional repository.
  • Help faculty archive their research papers, new
    old, digitizing if necessary.
  • Open-access journals
  • Help open access journals launched at your
    institution become known to other libraries,
    indexing services, potential funders, and
    potential readers.

17
What Libraries Can Do
  • Make sure scholars at your institution know how
    to find open access journals and archives in
    their fields. Set up tools to allow them to
    access these.
  • As open access journals proliferate, and as their
    usage and impact grow, cancel over-priced
    journals that do not measure up.
  • Engage with Government agencies regarding mergers
  • Familiarize yourself with the issues see Create
    Change at ltwww.createchange.orggt.
  • Support SPARC Europe to multiply your effort.

18
Theory Into Practice- Building Momentum
  • Increasing numbers of libraries are taking on
    role of hosts for institutional repositories
  • More open access journals prove the feasibility
    of the business model
  • Increasing awareness of authors of need to retain
    their publishing rights
  • Increasing awareness amongst funding bodies of
    publishing issues
  • Entry level for new players reduced
  • Membership of SPARC Europe increasing

19
SPARC Europe
  • Scholarly Publishing Academic Resources
    Coalition
  • Formed in 2002 under the auspices of LIBER
    following the success of SPARC (launched in 1998
    by the US Association of Research Libraries)
  • Encourages partnership between libraries,
    academics, societies and responsible publishers
  • Currently focused on STM, but coverage expanding
  • Has over 50 members and is growing
  • By acting together the members can influence the
    future of scholarly publishing

20
SPARC Europe Linking Advocacy Action
  • Alternative vehicles for editorial boards
  • Head-to-head competition with high-priced journals
  • Broad-scale aggregation, integration
  • Community control of broad channels
  • Collaboration among scientists/ societies and
    institutions
  • Innovative business models
  • Alternatives to institutional subscription-based
    journal economy

21
Measures of Success
  • SPARC supported projects are financially viable
    and significantly less expensive
  • SPARC supported products are attracting quality
    authors and editors
  • New players have entered the STM marketplace
    (SPARC partners and others)
  • Created an environment where editorial boards are
    emboldened to take action
  • STM journal price increases have moderated
  • New models are gaining acceptance

22
Create Change!
Although the battle is being fought over
subscription prices, what is really at stake...is
the scientific process itself. New York Times,
Dec. 8, 1998 An old tradition and a new
technology have converged to make possible an
unprecedented public good. Budapest Open Access
Initiative, Feb. 14, 2002 Contact SPARC Europe
david.prosser_at_bodley.ox.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com