LincolnDouglass Debate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

LincolnDouglass Debate

Description:

LD is a value debate-in other words you are arguing what SHOULD be right not ... or a society acquainted with both pragmatic and idealistic methods of operation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: kaysvillej
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LincolnDouglass Debate


1
Lincoln-Douglass Debate
  • a.k.a. LD

2
Basics
  • LD is a value debate-in other words you are
    arguing what SHOULD be right not what necessarily
    is right
  • Started by Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglass
    to debate slavery in the elections of 1860
  • Use three constructives
  • Flow EVERYTHING!!!!!

3
Constructing a Case
  • Intro
  • catch judges attention
  • should lend emotional or logical support to your
    stance
  • should directly tie to a point or thesis
  • always state for this reasons and those that
    follow, I stand firmly in support/negation of
    today's resolution that.

4
Definitions
  • These are central them of LD
  • Use definitions that best suit the topic and
    makes the most sense!
  • Primary source is Blacks Law Dictionary but any
    will work
  • Define almost every word in the resolutions-even
    words like is can be twisted by an opponent
  • Ex in LD debate the entire argument was whether
    or not slaves were DEFINED as human beings

5
Value
  • Value
  • LD is a value debate so this is most important
    part of round!
  • Common Values are Freedom, Utilitarianism,
    Quality of Life, Life, Individualism, etc
  • Everything in the case should SUPPORT the VALUE
  • Value Justification
  • Justification of why your value is important
  • Use logic and/or Great Philosopher/Historian

6
Criterion
  • How your value will be achieved
  • This is the measurement of your values success
  • Can be more specific value that is part of the
    larger value
  • This is oft-times the voting issue for judges
  • You MUST make the relationship between your case,
    your value and your criterion make sense in short
    summary

7
Common Values and/or Criterions
  • Individualism the value of the individual, the
    growth of the individual
  • Utilitarianism greatest good for the greatest
    number of people
  • Life refers to life itself, with inherent value
    REGARDLESS of quality of life
  • Quality of Life condition of living
  • Freedom traditional American value that can be
    interpreted to be just about anything
  • Civilization a society that has reached a high
    measure of development or a society acquainted
    with both pragmatic and idealistic methods of
    operation

8
More Values/Criterions
  • Progress Development or improvement in knowledge
    or skill
  • Quality of the Future either 1-doing not
    necessarily whats best for now but best for the
    future or 2-concern for quality of Life from this
    second on
  • Future Same as Q of F but more generally hoping
    we all have one
  • Global Security not blowing up the world, the US
    not be invaded
  • Justice Use of authority to uphold what is
    correct or true

9
More Values/Criterions
  • Truth inherent value, some religious
    associations, conformity of fact
  • Human Dignity the individual ethics which make
    us human and not animals nor slaves, adherence to
    personal ethics
  • Social Contract agreement between a citizen and
    his government
  • Dignity Human dignityjustifiable pride in a
    country/nation
  • Potential judgment not by what something DOING
    but what it could do
  • Potential Good the good something could be doing

10
Points/Contentions (Constructives)
  • You should have at least 3 but no more than 5
  • Usually statements of opinion (stated as fact)
    backed by facts!
  • Remember 2nd best first, worst 2nd and best
    contention last
  • Evidence is important but NOT the focus of LD
  • Try to always use IMPORTANT historical figures

11
Conclusion
  • Should emphasize the main point of your case AND
    your value
  • Should bring closure to your case
  • SUMMARIZE your value and criterion and make the
    clear connection one more time!

12
Basic Structure
  • 1AC 6 minutes
  • CX 3 minutes
  • 1NC/R 7 minutes
  • CX 3 minutes
  • 1AR 4 minutes
  • 2NR 6 minutes
  • 2AR 3 minutes
  • Notice that the AFF always gets 3 speeches but
    the NEG has more time for individual speeches

13
A few words to know
  • Utilitarianism the greatest good for the
    greatest amount of people
  • Pragmatic practical, real-world scenario
  • Ideal Opposite of pragmatic, what we would LIKE
    to have happen
  • Inherent inevitably and originally part of
    something
  • Intrinsic something that has value in and of
    itself
  • Extrinsic opposite of intrinsic, has value
    because of what it does or causes
  • Social Contract agreement between people and
    their government

14
A few more ideas to know.
  • Locke Social Contract
  • Humans are evil by nature and government/social
    contract is all that kept humans from becoming
    animals
  • Hobbes Social Contract
  • Similar to Locke but way more vehement
  • Would NOT agree with Rousseaus second purpose of
    Social Contract
  • Rousseau's Social Contract
  • People are basically good and government exists
    to improve life for everyone by protecting its
    people and IF people are secure to provide
    services for people

15
Even more things to know.
  • Maslows Hierarchy this is NOT a ranking of
    values-really it says that without food, air and
    shelter humans will not think about anything but
    being safe so humanity wont feel emotion or look
    for value/moral decisions
  • Maslow believes in self-actualization that is
    only achieved when basic survival needs are met

16
Things to Remember
  • FLOW!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Spend the majority of your time on your
    Value/Criterion and making sure your contentions
    support them!
  • Ask for the Judges Paradigm
  • Have at least 10 constructives to choose from in
    each round (both AFF and NEG) so that you never
    run the exact same case twice!

17
Resolved A just society ought not use the death
penalty as a form of punishment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com