Title: Structured Controversy: Who Owns Your Genes
1Structured ControversyWho Owns Your Genes?
- Verna Lang, Ph.D.
- Biology AP Biology, 9-12
- Kenwood High School, Clarksville, TN
- verna.lang_at_cmcss.net
2Developer Page
- Developer Materials
- Background
- Rules of Conduct
- Overview Standards
- Overview Implementation
- Overview Assessment
- Resources Credit
- Student Materials
- Introduction
- Websites and Print Materials
- Round One
- Round Two
- Round Three
- Summative Assessment
3Structured Controversy Who Owns Your Genes?
Background
- For a structured controversy lesson, teachers
select topics that are aligned with the
curriculum and offer clear but distinctive
alternative positions. Contrasting perspectives
are documented with key articles that introduce
the major supporting arguments. These articles
provide the launching pad for a structured
controversy but provide only provide limited
background information. The ultimate goal is for
the group to achieve consensus through
compromise. - Although the process follows a prescribed format
with rigid timeframes, it is actually a
constructivist and inquiry-based approach to
teaching and learning. Students participating in
a controversy examine divergent viewpoints to
encourage such activities as framing arguments,
perspective taking, consequence exploration,
behavior justification, and values clarification.
They become actively involved in the own
learning, participate in rigorous
problem-solving, and though these activities,
integrate and articulate their own ideas. Factual
knowledge is acquired on a need-to-know basis.
Developer Page
4Rules of Conduct
- Suggestions
- The purpose of a structured debate is not to beat
the opposing team but to achieve consensus
through compromise. - Be critical of peoples ideas not the people
themselves. - During large group forums, only one person can
speak at a time. - No interruptions are permitted when arguments are
being presented. - Paraphrase when you want to be sure that you
clearly understand something. - All time limits must be strictly followed.
- Every person on the team should speak during the
debate.
Developer Page
5Who Owns Your Genes?Overview Standards
CLE 3210.4.7 Assess the scientific and ethical
ramifications of emerging genetic technologies.
SPI 3210.T/E.3 Evaluate the overall benefit to
cost ratio of a new technology. SPI 3210.4.9
Evaluate the scientific and ethical issues
associated with gene technologies genetic
engineering, cloning, transgenic organism
production, stem cell research, and DNA
fingerprinting.
Developer Page
6Who Owns Your Genes? Overview Implementation
After learning about the human genome project and
genetic engineering, I would ask the class How
many of you think you own your own genes? I
would then start out the activity by having them
read the Michael Crichton article Who Owns Your
Genes? http//www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/13/opin
ion/edcrichton.php
Developer Page
7Excerpt Who owns your genes?Patenting life
By Michael Crichton Published February 13,
2007 International Herald Tribune You, or
someone you love, may die because of a gene
patent that should never have been granted in the
first place. Sound far-fetched? Unfortunately,
it's only too real. In the United States, gene
patents are now used to halt research, prevent
medical testing and keep vital information from
you and your doctors. Gene patents slow the pace
of medical advance on deadly diseases. And they
raise costs exorbitantly A test for breast
cancer that could be done for 1,000 now costs
3,000. Why? Because the holder of the gene
patent can charge whatever he wants, and does.
Couldn't somebody make a cheaper test? Sure, but
the patent holder blocks any competitor's test.
He owns the gene. Nobody else can test for it. In
fact, you can't even donate their own breast
cancer gene to another scientist without
permission. The gene may exist in your body, but
it's now viewed as private property.
Developer Page
8Who Owns Your Genes?Overview Formative
Assessment
Students will enter their contrasting and
opposing positions into a Venn Diagram as they
are forming their discussion ideas, and finish
with the consensus in the middle. http//127.
0.0.14001/static/tools/Assessments/VennDiagram/Ve
nnDiagram.pdf
Developer Page
9Who Owns Your Genes? Resources Credits
- CREDITS
- Who Owns Your Genes?
- http//www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/13/opinion/edc
richton.php - Who owns our genes?
- http//www.unmc.edu/publicaffairs/discover/spring9
9stories/owns.htm - Who Owns Our DNA?
- http//www.leidenslatest.leidenuniv.nl/index.php3?
c29 - Should Genes Be Patented?
- http//www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID1534
- Genetics and Patenting
- http//www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome
/elsi/patents.shtml4
- STRUCTURED
- CONTROVERSY
- REFERENCES
- Annenberg Channel
- Center for Case Studies
- Cooperative Learning Center
- Instructional Strategies Online
- Lets Chat
Developer Page
10Who Owns Your Genes? Student Materials
Introduction Websites and Materials Round
One Round Two Round Three
Developer Page
11Who Owns Your Genes? Introduction
- Overview
- Much of the benefits or potential benefits from
genetic engineering come from the work done by
private corporations. - Patenting human genes protects the rights of the
businesses investing in this research by keeping
other corporations from profiting from their work
and investment. However, what becomes of our
basic human right to control our own bodies if a
corporation controls how some of our genes are
used? - Learning Goals
- You should be able to take both sides of this
controversy after reading both sides of the issue
and defend each side in turn. - You will be able to reach a consensus opinion by
the end of the lesson.
Materials
Round One
Round Two
Round Three
12Who Owns Your Genes? Introduction
- Assessment
- You will be assessed by construction of a Venn
Diagram as the student explores both sides of the
controversy. - A summative reflective self-assessment is
provided as an homework assignment. - Grouping
- You will be divided into two evenly numbered
groups. Since each group will take turns
supporting each side of the controversy. Groups
consists of an even number of members on each
side.
Materials
Round One
Round Two
Round Three
13Who Owns Your Genes? Websites Print Materials
- Who Owns Your Genes?
- http//www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/13/opinion/edc
richton.php - Who owns our genes?
- http//www.unmc.edu/publicaffairs/discover/spring9
9stories/owns.htm - Who Owns Our DNA?
- http//www.leidenslatest.leidenuniv.nl/index.php3?
c29 - Should Genes Be Patented?
- http//www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID1534
- Genetics and Patenting
- http//www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome
/elsi/patents.shtml4 - References Can be printed from the online source
in advance if computers are not available to the
students.
Introduction
Round One
Round Two
Round Three
14Who Owns Your Genes?
- Round One
- 1. Understand the Position 15-20 minutes.
- Review the information package and prepare a
compelling argument that support the position to
which you have been assigned. - 2. Present the Position 6-10 minutes.
- Your team offers its opinions and arguments. The
other team listens carefully without
interruption. - 3. Open Discussion Forum 5 minutes.
- During this stage, teams ask clarifying
questions, look for evidence, and search for
meaning.
Introduction
Materials
Round Two
Round Three
15Who Owns Your Genes?
- Round Two
- Switch Positions 5 minutes.
- Physically shift into the seats formerly occupied
by the other team. - Your team must develop an argument for the
opposite perspective. - 2. Present the Position 6 minutes.
- Your team must offer opinions and arguments while
the other team listens carefully without
interruption. - 3. Open Discussion Forum 2 minutes.
- Teams ask clarifying questions, look for
evidence, and search for meaning.
Introduction
Materials
Round Three
Round One
16Who Owns Your Genes?
- Round Three
- 1. Reach Consensus 5 minutes.
- Both teams meet to reach a single, mutually
acceptable position. - As a class, we will write the compromise position
on the board or on chart paper.
Introduction
Materials
Round One
Round Two
17Summative Assessment
- For homework, answer these questions
- Reflective Self-Assessment
- Which side of the controversy did you personally
support? - Did you change your mind after you had to support
the opposite viewpoint? - How difficult was it to switch to support the
opposite viewpoint? - Do you still agree with the consensus arrived at
by the class? Why or why not? - How could this exercise be applied to other
controversies that you encounter in life?
Explain and give 2 examples. - Suppose pollen from a field where genetically
modified (GM) corn is growing blows across to a
neighbors field and fertilizes some of their corn
crop. The company that developed the GM corn is
suing the neighbor for using their genes without
paying them royalties. You are the judge in this
groundbreaking case and must reach a fair ruling
for all concerned. Write 3-5 full paragraphs
giving your judgment.
18(No Transcript)