Title:
1Honest GISError and Uncertainty
- Berry, chs. 10-12
- Longley et al., chs. 6 and 15
2Blinded by Science?
- Result of accurate scientific measurement
- Reveal agenda, biases of their creators
- GIS databases built from maps
- Not necessarily objective, scientific
- measurements
- Impossible to create perfect representation of
world
3The Necessity of Fuzziness
- Its not easy to lie with maps, its
essential...to present a useful and truthful
picture, an accurate map must tell white lies.
-- Mark Monmonier - distort 3-D world into 2-D abstraction
- characterize most important aspects of spatial
reality - portray abstractions (e.g., gradients, contours)
as distinct spatial objects
4Fuzziness (cont.)
- All GIS subject to uncertainty
- What the data tell us about the real world
- Range of possible truths
- Uncertainty affects results of analysis
- Confidence limits - plus or minus
- Difficult to determine
- If it comes from a computer it must be wright
5Uncertainty
- Measurements not perfectly accurate
- Maps distorted to make them readable
- Lines repositioned
- 5th St. and railroad through Corvallis at scale
of 1250,000 - At this scale both objects thinner than map
symbols - Map is generalized
- Definitions vague, ambiguous, subjective
- Landscape has changed over time
6(No Transcript)
7Forest Type
8Soil Type
9Assessing the Fuzziness
- positions assumed accurate
- really just best guess
- differentiate best guesses from truth
- shadow map of certainty
- where an estimate is likely to be the most
accurate - tracking error propagation
10Polygon Overlay
11Search For Soil 2 Forest 5How Good Given
Uncertainty in Input Layers?
12Spread boundary locations to a specified
distanceZone of transition, Cells on line are
uncertain
13Code cells according to distance from boundary,
which relates to uncertainty
14Based on distance from boundary, code cells with
probability of correct classification
15Same thing for Forest mapLinear Function of
increasing probabilityCould also use
inverse-distance-squared
16Overlay soil forest shadow maps to get joint
probability mapProduct of separate probabilities
17Original overlay of S2/F5Overlay implied 100
certaintyShadow map says differently!
18Nearly HALF the map is fairly uncertainof the
joint condition of S2/F5
19Towards an Honest GIS
- can map a simple feature location
- can also map a continuum of certainty
- model of the propagation of error (when maps are
combined) - assessing error on continuous surfaces
- verify performance of interpolation scheme
20More Strategies
- Simulation strategy
- Complex models
- Describing uncertainty as a spatially
autoregressive model with parameter rho not
helpful - How to get message across
- Many models out there
- Recent research on modeling uncertainty (NCGIA
Intiative 1) - Users cant understand them all
21Strategies (cont.)
- Producer of data must describe uncertainty
- RMSE 7 m
- Metadata
- SDTS - 5 elements
- Positional accuracy
- Attribute accuracy
- Logical consistency (logical rules? polygons
close?) - Completeness
- Lineage
22Strategies (cont.)
- Not effective
- What impact will uncertainty have on results of
analysis?? - (1) Ignore the issue completely
- (2) Describe uncertainty with measures (shadow
map or RMSE) - (3) Simulate equallty probably versions of data
23Simulation Example