ModularTe project

1
ModularTe project

• Summary of evaluation results
• ITALY ARIES FORMAZIONE
• Aldo Minardo, PhD

2
Product evaluation report

• The test was addressed to the main users of the
  course (the students), those who will handle
  the course (the teachers), and the experts.
• The feedback is the result of three different
  evaluation workshops submitted to experts,
  teachers and students in October-November 2007.
• The questions were translated into Italian to
  help the users to understand all the questions
  properly.
• The product evaluation consisted of 15 questions.

3
1. The methodological concept is clear
4
2. The course is well structured
5
3. The modules are consistently arranged
6
4. The level of difficulty is appropriate
7
5. All subject fields are adequately covered
8
6. The standards of quality and reliability are
respected
9
7. Information is presented in an innovative way
10
8. The content is relevant for the target group
11
9. The training materials are of immediate
usability
12
10. The training tools are attractive
13
11. The learning objectives are clear
14
12. The contents are up-to-date
15
13. The materials are of general applicability in
my country
16
14. I would recommend/adopt this course
17
15. The course meets the EU accreditation/validati
on standards
18
Discussion on results

• The overall feedback from the questionnaire is
  positive
• Some criticism came from students (clearness of
  the methodological concept, usability of the
  training material)
• On the contrary, most enthusiasm came from
  technology teachers.

19
The students responseThe highest scores for the
students were

• The course is well structured
• The modules are consistently arranged
• The level of difficulty is appropriate
• All subject fields are adequately covered
• The training tools are attractive
• The items which the students felt more uncertain
  were
• The course meets the EU accreditation/validation
  standards (mostly I dont know)
• I would recommend/adopt this course (mostly I
  dont know)
• The training materials are of immediate usability
  

20
The Teachers responseThe highest scores for
the teachers were

• All subject fields are adequately covered
• The standards of quality and reliability are
  respected
• Information is presented in an innovative way
• The tasks are helpful and appropriate
• The learning objectives are clear
• The areas where teachers are less enthusiastic
  (but still positive) are
• the materials are of general applicability in my
  country (manyI dont know)
• the course meets the EU accreditation/validation
  standards (good but not excellent)

21
Specialists - Academicians

• The specialists agree with almost all the
• statements, but the highest scores were
• The methodological concept is clear
• The course is well structured
• The modules are consistently arranged
• Less enthusiasm, though above average, is shown
  in the item
• I would recommend/adopt this course

22
Overall feedback
23

• Thank you for your attention