Title: 3Tier Model: Rescue Program for Struggling Secondary Students
13-Tier Model Rescue Program for Struggling
Secondary Students
- Reducing Academic Difficulties by Providing
Immediate, Intensive Intervention
2Needs Assessment
- More than 8 million students in grades 4 through
12 are struggling readers. - (U.S. Department of Education Statistics)
- Students in the lowest 25 percent of their class
are 20 times more likely to drop out. - (Alliance for Excellence in Education)
- 75 of incarcerated individuals are high school
dropouts.
3Intensive, Immediate Intervention3-Tier Model
- Description
- The 3-Tier Model is a framework for organizing
instruction. The model consists of three tiers
or levels of instruction. Movement through the
tiers is a dynamic process, with students
entering and exiting as needed.
4Research Base
- Preventing Reading DifficultiesA Three-Tiered
Intervention Model - Vaughn, Linan-Thompson, Elbaum, 2006
- Bringing Research-Based Practice in Reading
Intervention to Scale - Denton, Vaughn 2003
- Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties
for Elementary and Secondary Students - Hjelm, J., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S
5It is all the same!
- 3-Tier Model is a systemic approach to RTI
(Response to Intervention) - Benchmark, Grade Level, Proficient
- Strategic, Some Risk, Basic
- Intensive, High Risk, Below Basic
6Tier I Core Classroom Instruction
- Consistent research based instruction in all
content areas based on state standards - Screening of all students to determine
instructional needs at least three times per year
(fall, winter, and spring) - Ongoing professional development to provide
teachers with the necessary tools to ensure every
student receives quality instruction
7Tier II Supplemental Instruction
- For some students, core classroom instruction is
not enough. Tier II is designed to meet the needs
of these students by providing them with
additional instruction daily. - Booster Shot to those students who are unable
to master the concepts taught in Tier I.
8Tier III Intensive Intervention
- A small percentage of students require more
support in acquiring vital skills than Tier II
instruction can provide. For these students, Tier
III provides instruction that is more explicit,
more intensive, and specifically designed to meet
their individual needs.
93-Tiered Instruction
5 Intensive
15 Supplemental
80 Core
10To meet the needs of all learners 4-Tiers of
Instruction
Intensive
Strategic/ Supplemental
Benchmark/ Grade Level
Advanced
1175
50
40
20
percentiles
12Your ISAT data
- What percent of your students are advanced?
- What percent of your students are proficient?
- What percent of your students are basic?
- What percent are below basic?
13Analyzing your system
- Are your advanced students staying advanced?
- Are you maintaining your percentage of proficient
students? - Are you moving a significant percentage of
proficient students to advanced? - Are you moving basic students to proficient?
- Are you moving below basic students to basic?
14Goals
- Maintain 90 of your proficient or advanced
students - Move 70 of your Tier II (strategic students to
proficient) - Move 70 of your Tier III (below basic) students
to Tier II (basic)
15Implementing the 3-Tier Model
- Comprehensive Assessment Plan
- Research based curricular materials and
strategies aligned to state standards - Systemic plan for intervention
- Collaboration between personnel
16Implementing the 3-Tier Model
- Comprehensive Assessment Plan
- Research based curricular materials and
strategies aligned to state standards - Systemic plan for intervention
- Collaboration between personnel
17Comprehensive Assessment Plan
18Your Comprehensive Assessment Plan
19Universal Screening - Secondary
- Attendance
- Discipline Referrals
- Progress Reports
20Activity Model
What other data points do you need?
- Michael is a 16 year old 10th grade student. His
8th grade ISAT data placed him at the Below
Basic Level. - Michaels progress report indicates that he is
struggling to meet mastery in English,
Pre-Algebra, Earth Science, and Western
Civilization. -
-
21Michael.
- Is there a plan in place at your school to
identify Michaels specific learning needs?
22Word Level Reading Difficulties
- Most common and best understood reading
disability - Largest single group of students in special
education - Almost 40 of all children identified for special
education - Many served in Title I programs have word
recognition difficulties
Jack Fletcher, University of Houston
23Comprehension
- Students with comprehension issues often lack
oral language - Skilled secondary readers understand academic
language struggling readers do not - Struggling readers do not necessarily generalize
skills - Comprehension needs to be taught with both
narrative and expository text
24Fluency
- Key characteristic of poor readers is the slow
and inaccurate reading of text. - G. Reid Lyon, N.I.H.D.
- 44 of 4th graders exhibited low fluency
- (National Assessment of Educational Progress
NAEP,1998)
25Implementing the 3-Tier Model
- Comprehensive Assessment Plan
- Research based curricular materials and
strategies aligned to state standards - Systemic plan for intervention
- Collaboration between personnel
- http//www.sde.state.id.us/adoptionguide
26NCLBs Definition ofScientifically Based
- Use of rigorous, systematic and empirical
evidence - Adequacy of data analyses to test the stated
hypothesis and justify the conclusions drawn
27Defining SBR, cont.
- Reliance on measurements or observational methods
that provide valid data across evaluators and
observers across multiple measurements and
observations - Acceptance by a peer-reviewed journal or approved
by a panel of independent experts
28Do you have to purchase an off-the-shelf program?
- No!
- Things to consider
- Do you have staff turnover?
- Do you have horizontal alignment between
classrooms? - Do you have vertical alignment across grades?
- Are the teachers using the materials youve
purchased? - How much do they have to supplement existing
materials?
29Implementing the 3-Tier Model
- Comprehensive Assessment Plan
- Research based curricular materials aligned to
state standards - Systemic plan for intervention
- Collaboration between personnel
30Activity Model
What other data points do you need?
- Michael is a 16 year old 10th grade student. His
8th grade ISAT data placed him at the Below
Basic Level. - Michaels progress report indicates that he is
struggling to meet mastery in English,
Pre-Algebra, Earth Science, and Western
Civilization. - Michaels school used AIMSweb to get a fluency
rate. - WPM put Michael at the 10th percentile.
-
31Systemic Plan for Intervention
- What do teachers in your school do if a student
is struggling?
32- The teachers influence on student achievement
scores is twenty times greater than any other
variable, including class size and student
poverty.
Fallon, 2003
33System-wide Support
- If you put a good teacher up against a weak
system the system will win every time. - Michael Fullan
34Systemic Intervention
- Have you established instructional profiles
(Standard Protocols)? - Is there catch up time built into the schedule?
- Is intervention pull-out or push-in?
- Is there a mechanism in place to contact parents?
- How often is progress measured?
- Have you established decision-making rules?
- How are students grouped during instruction?
35SPEED Intervention Criteria
- Systematic school-wide
- Practical uses existing resources
- Effective available and operational early in the
school year - Essential agreed upon standards
- Directive mandatory, not invitational
Learning by Doing, 2006
36Research on Improving Outcomes for Secondary
Students
- Smaller is better
- Cooperative Learning
- Universal Design (mastery of standards for all
students) - Apply what they have learned (in-class projects)
- Independent learning activities that require
students to practice, review (homework) - Long term projects
37Physical Arrangement
38Smaller is better/cooperative learning
Teacher
39Smaller is better/but placement is important!
Teacher
40Implementing the 3-Tier Model
- Comprehensive Assessment Plan
- Research based curricular materials aligned to
state standards - Systemic plan for intervention
- Collaboration between personnel
41Educator Teams
- Develop Instructional Profiles
- Brainstorm possible interventions
- Optimize resources within the building
- Analyze progress monitoring data or formative
assessments - Celebrate success
- Share concerns
42Steps to Implementation
- District level support
- Leadership Team within school
- Shared collaboration time
- Comprehensive Assessment Plan
- Research based curricular materials and
strategies aligned to state standards - Schedule that includes catch up time
- Small group instruction based on student needs
43Start with Tier I
- High quality instruction in the regular classroom
is likely to reach the greatest number of
students. - Build time into the schedule for acceleration and
intervention. - Ensure fidelity by creating a curriculum map.
- Institute progress monitoring.
44Cautions
- Beware the appeal of mindless precedent
- System of intervention should be fluid
- Systems are most effective when they are
supporting teams rather than individuals - Common understanding
- No support system will compensate for bad teaching
45Resources
- 3-Tier Professional Development Resources
http//www.texasreading.org/3tier/materials.asp - National Center for Student Progress Monitoring
http//www.studentprogress.org/default.asp - Principals Guide to Intervention
http//www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/support
46Resources
- Center on Innovation Improvement
http//www.centerii.org/improvement/spotlights - Best Practices Just for Kids http//www.just4kid
s.org/en/research_policy/best_practices/about_prac
tice.cfm
47Resources
- Learning by Doing A Handbook for Professional
Learning Communities at Work, Dufour, Dufour,
Eaker, Many ISBN 978-1-932127-93-5 - National Association of State Directors of
Special Education http//www.nasdse.org/Portals/0/
SCHOOL.pdf
48Resources
- Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by
Design, Carol Ann Tomlinson, Jay McTighe - Instructional Strategies Online (Saskatoon Public
School Division) httpolc.spsd.sk.ca/DE/PD/instr/i
nstrsk.html - University of Virginia, httpcurryedschool.virgini
a.edu -
49Idaho State Department of Education
- Marybeth Flachbart Student Achievement and
School Accountability - mbflachbart_at_sde.idaho.gov
- Nancy Thomas Price RTI
- nthomasprice_at_sde.idaho.gov
- Lisa Kinnaman, School Improvement
- lisakinnaman_at_boisestate.edu