Aircraft Data: Geographic Distribution, Acquisition, Quality Control, and Availability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Aircraft Data: Geographic Distribution, Acquisition, Quality Control, and Availability

Description:

'AMDAR' data (China, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, So. Africa) 7 ... Worked out over 15 years between NOAA and the participating US airlines ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: moni5
Learn more at: https://amdar.noaa.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aircraft Data: Geographic Distribution, Acquisition, Quality Control, and Availability


1
Aircraft Data Geographic Distribution,
Acquisition, Quality Control, and Availability
  • Work at NOAA/ESRL/GSD and elsewhere

2
AMDAR data -- definition
  • AMDAR - Aircraft Meteorological DAta Relay
  • The generic term for all automated meteorological
    reports from commercial aircraft
  • GSD receives (from a variety of sources) and
    distributes (with restrictions) all AMDAR data
  • Most AMDAR data are used in GSDs, and NCEPs
    weather models

3
Flavors of AMDAR data
  • MDCRS data (to be discussed by Al)
  • E-AMDAR (Europe and Africa)
  • AMDAR (Asia and Australia)
  • Canadian (Canada, inc. flights into U.S.)
  • TAMDAR (U. S. experimental)
  • Other experimental

4
MDCRS data (24 hours)
5
E-AMDAR data
6
AMDAR data (China, Japan, Australia, New
Zealand, So. Africa)
7
Canadian data (jets and turboprops)
8
TAMDAR data (turboprops, generally below 20 Kft)
9
Experimental Turbulence (EDR) data, from UAL
(above 20Kft) and TAMDAR (problematic)
10
Experimental Icing data from TAMDAR and
(sometimes) Delta
11
Availability
  • Real-time data are restricted to governments,
    researchers, etc.
  • Graphical displays are available at
  • http//amdar.noaa.gov/
  • Binary and text data are available from MADIS
  • http//madis.noaa.gov/
  • data gt 48 h old are unrestricted
  • archival data back to July 2001
  • many tools for subsectioning data
  • GSD is a research, not operational organization
  • nonetheless, data flows have been pretty steady

12
Data Restrictions
  • Described at http//amdar.noaa.gov/FAQ.html
  • Worked out over 15 years between NOAA and the
    participating US airlines
  • Generally, non-commercial research users may have
    access to real-time data, if their work is of
    potential benefit to airlines

13
AMDAR QC in the U.S.
  • NCEP (Brad Ballish) is the official U.S. data
    quality center
  • http//www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/qap/
  • GSD provides many research QC products based on
    the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC)
  • Another U.S. center doing excellent work Pat
    Pauley at the Naval Research Laboratory
  • Many non-U.S. centers also perform AMDAR QC

14
AMDAR QC at GSD
  • We look at differences between AMDAR observations
    and 1h forecasts from various versions of the RUC
    model

15
The Rapid Update Cycle
  • An hourly cycle
  • Ingests all available data each hour
  • AMDAR, TAMDAR, RAOBS (0 12 Z), Satellite,
    Surface, etc., etc.
  • Covers the CONUS
  • We run many RUC cycles
  • For AMDAR QC, we use a 20 km cycle called dev2

16
RUC - AMDAR Comparisons
  • Statistical results are available at
    http//amdar.noaa.gov/ruc_acars/
  • and include
  • Time series for individual aircraft
  • 3 and 7 day interactive statistics
  • plan view of data and corresponding RUC values
  • (summary statistics are open real-time data are
    restricted)

17
http//amdar.noaa.gov/ruc_acars/
Plan view showing Wind-rejects for TAMDAR. Reject
reason indicated. Overall statistics shown
18
(No Transcript)
19
7-day summary statistics (sortable). New columns
show the fraction of obs rejected by the RUC, for
each variable. We reject many TAMDAR winds
because we dont accept descent winds currently
20
Current AMDAR Data Quality
  • Generally as good or better than RAOBs
  • To check, we compare AMDAR and RAOBs with RUC 1h
    forecasts
  • (RUC is not the truth, but, when a long time
    period is aggregated, can serve as a common
    denominator)
  • Results to follow are from
  • 1-31 Dec. 2006
  • AMDAR data from 0 UTC /- 30 minutes
  • 200 - 800 observations per pressure level
  • Canadian jets and all turboprops excluded
  • In the Great Lakes Region
  • 13 RAOBs at 0 UTC

21
AMDAR - dev2 1h fcst Temperature RMS difference
for obs taken near 0 UTC
Red shows AMDAR ascents and en-route Blue shows
AMDAR descents
22
AMDAR - dev2 1h fcst Temperature RMS difference
for obs taken near 0 UTC AMDAR and RAOBs show
very similar statistics
Red shows AMDAR ascents and en-route Blue shows
AMDAR descents Green shows RAOB
23
T bias is small (lt 0.5C) for AMDAR. (Generally
AMDAR ascents are warmer than descents, but not
at low levels during this winter month.)
Red shows AMDAR ascents and en-route Blue shows
AMDAR descents
24
T bias is small (lt 0.5C) for AMDAR and
RAOBs. RUC shows a slight warm bias wrt RAOBs.
Red shows AMDAR ascents and en-route Blue shows
AMDAR descents Green shows RAOB
25
For RMS of the vector wind difference with the
RUC
Red shows AMDAR ascents and en-route Blue shows
AMDAR descents
26
For RMS of the vector wind difference with the
RUC, AMDAR and RAOB show similar values at all
levels.
Red shows AMDAR ascents and en-route Blue shows
AMDAR descents Green shows RAOB
27
Water Vapor
  • Most AMDAR measurements dont include vapor
    information
  • WVSS-II measures it, but recent data is
    problematic
  • TAMDAR measures it
  • In lower troposphere only (below 500 mb, 18 Kft)
  • In U. S. Midwest only
  • Well look at recent TAMDAR results

28
Relative Humidity RMS (wrt RUC dev2) for data
taken near 0 UTC
TAMDAR (open circles)
Red shows aircraft ascents and en-route Blue
shows aircraft descents
29
Relative Humidity RMS (wrt RUC dev2) for data
taken near 0 UTC
TAMDAR (open circles) RAOBs (green) TAMDAR RH
differences with RUC are generally smaller than
RAOB RH differences. An encouraging result.
Red shows aircraft ascents and en-route Blue
shows aircraft descents
30
Summary
  • AMDAR is an extensive, accurate, and timely data
    source
  • We thank the airlines for providing the data
  • Tools at NCEP and GSD have been very helpful in
    evaluating
  • Aircraft performance
  • Model behavior
  • Feedback to and from airlines, researchers, and
    other nations has been invaluable in improving
    quality.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com