Title: Top Down and Bottom Up Capital Allocation
1Top Down and Bottom Up Capital Allocation
Colin Burke, Credit Modelling
2Contents
- Treasurys Portfolio
- Risk Platform Project
- Bottom up economic capital calculation
- Bottom-up economic capital allocation
- Relationship with ICAAP
- Challenges and obstacles
- This talk focuses on Treasurys plan for a
bottom-up capital allocation and how this
interacts with a top down allocation.
3Treasurys Portfolio
- HBOS Treasury Services (HBOTS) is the Treasury
Services arm of the HBOS Group - It provides funding for the Group and hedges for
the Group and its clients - The HBOSTS portfolio consists of
- Bonds (bank and government), CDs, CP etc
- Money Market (loans, deposits)
- Derivatives (interest rate, FX, equity, commodity
and credit) - Securities Financing Transactions (repos etc)
- ABS investments
4Risk Platform Project (i)
Scope
- Market Risk deliver a platform for CAD 2
- Credit Risk deliver a platform for credit
exposures, economic capital and stress testing. - An economic capital model is only as good as its
inputs PD, LGD, exposures, correlations - gt stress testing functionality for credit risk
- gt credit exposure in IMM (derivatives and SFT)
- gt back testing of IMM exposures
- gt credit economic capital for derivative and
non-derivative trades
5Risk Platform Project (ii)
- System selection process
- Request for Proposals (RFPs) were issued on
February 23rd 2005 with a requested reply date of
March 24th 2005 - Following preliminary choice of the risk engine
and market data solutions, a seven week proof of
concept started on the 24th of August 2005.
Included comparison to HBOSTS own calculations,
theoretical review, technology review etc
6Risk Platform Project (iii)
- Project Definition Report produced in early 2006
defining key required enhancements for credit
risk under the following headings - Credit Exposure (IMM)
- Stress and Back Testing
- Economic Capital (see later)
- Project has begun. For Credit Risk initial work
was the testing of credit exposure - MTM unit and bulk tests (comparison with front
office system) - PFE/EPE unit and bulk tests (comparison with our
own models)
7Risk Platform Project (iiia)
Example PFE tests
Unit Test (CDS)
Bulk test (portfolio of 20 swaps)
8Risk Platform Project (iv)
- Vendor Components
- Data Consolidation Module
- receives, cleans and stores market data
- Market Risk Engine
- Bootstraps yield curves
- Market Risk Calcs CAD 2 calculation (VaR) etc
- Stress Testing for Credit and Market Risk
- Calibrates stochastic models for PFE / EPE
Calculator - Calculates and allocates EC (including use of EPE
profiles) - PFE / EPE Calculator
- Calculates PFE, Expected Exposure, EPE etc
- Incorporates correlation, netting and collateral
effects
9Risk Platform Project (v)
Front Office Systems
Bloomberg
etc
Reuters
Trade data
Data Consolidator
Market Risk Engine/ Parameter Generator
Cleaned market data
Trade data Market data Stochastic Parameters
PFE / EPE Analytics
10Risk Platform Project (vi)
11Economic Capital Enhancements (i)
- Key enhancements for economic capital include
- Using vendor application to implement internally
defined credit worthiness factor models (no
reliance on vendors proprietary approaches). This
gives default correlation. - Vendor-based Economic Capital Engine will give
time of default. A multi-period model. - Economic Capital allocated on basis of Expected
Shortfall. Total Capital calculated as CVaR. Can
allocate in different parts of loss distribution
12Economic Capital Enhancements (ii)
- Building our own factor model
- Leverages from market VaR model statistics set
- For Credit this is normally used to calibrate the
stochastic process for derivative exposure e.g.
mean reversions and instantaneous volatilities
for Hull-White interest model, drift and
volatility in GBM and correlations between risk
factors
13Economic Capital Enhancements (iii)
14Economic Capital Enhancements (iv)
- The basic infrastructure to build a CreditMetrics
style factor model already exists (CreditMetrics
uses equity values as a proxy for asset values)
Use linear factor model for credit worthiness or
ability to pay process
- To use VaR Statistics Sets we need to add
industry and country breakdowns for each
counterparty - We also need to use a longer history of data than
we would normally use for credit exposure
15Economic Capital Enhancements (v)
- Time of default. Why is it important? Consider
the following EPE profile
- A default today (01/06/2006) has zero exposure.
A default around June 2011 has maximum exposure - If default occurs, we are not indifferent to its
timing - Conventional economic capital models do not give
the time of default or assumes at the single risk
horizon (usually one year from today)
- See bottom up calculation for illustration
16Bottom Up Capital Calculation (i)
- Inputs
- Non-derivatives trades (bonds, CP etc) input
into market risk engine at trade level - Derivatives and SFT input EPE profile from
analytics engine at the netting pool level into
the market risk engine. - Market risk engine forms factor model
(correlation) - Combine with Basel II PDs and LGDs. PDs are term
structure of PDs entered via a transition matrix - Credit spreads by rating (for effects of MTM
moves in non-default states)
17Bottom Up Capital Calculation (ii)
- Modelling Approach
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Time of default due to multi-time step
simulation. Uses ideas from Hull and Whites
credit derivative methodology
Asset Value
etc...
Barrier 2
Barrier 3
Defaulted
Time
Today
H2
H1
Barrier 1
18Bottom Up Capital Calculation (iii)
- Output (i) Portfolio Loss distribution and
portfolio capital i.e. a Treasury estimate of
Treasurys economic capital
Expected Loss
Probability
Economic Capital
Loss
19Bottom Up Capital Calculation (iv)
- Output (ii)
- Capital to each trade/netting pool
- Sum of allocated capital equals total capital
Risk Appetite
Shortfall
Economic Capital
Probability
Loss
20Using The Economic Capital (i)
- Treasury only context
- Concentration analysis
- EC limits
- RAROC / performance measurement
- Pricing advice
- Own alpha estimation (IMM)
- Plan to run Economic Capital calculations and IMM
calculations daily - Typical pricing advice relates to swap
transactions conducted for customers of Corporate
Bank. Currently use an EPE/market implied
approach. Risk Platform will supplement this with
EPE/RAROC approach
21Using The Economic Capital (ii)
Example Consider an interest rate swap with a
risky-counterpart. The risky counterparty
exposure is given by
Vrisky Vriskless EL where
- The contribution of the credit spread to economic
capital is reflected in two ways - A component due to credit migration (via changes
in the marginal default probabilities above) and, - Changes due to simulated market rates as the
counterparty portfolio ages to the risk horizon
i.e. a forward value of EL(t)
22Relationship with ICAAP
- Current plans are for Group to allocate capital
to business on Basel II basis - Plan to use Risk Platform as part of challenge
process to the Group allocation - Once the allocation to Treasury is agreed, use
Risk Platform to allocate agreed capital to trade
and netting pool level
23Relationship with ICAAP
- Some challenges
- Model Differences Our Treasury model differs
from the wider model in terms of its modelling
approach - Data Our Treasury model differs in terms of its
default correlation source - Diversification The Treasury model will show our
one portfolio in isolation.
24Summary
- HBOS Treasury are implementing a credit and
market risk Risk Engine - For Credit Risk, this performs IMM and Economic
Capital calculations and is the exposure stress
testing engine - Key enhancements for economic capital include
- Time of default
- Capital Allocation based on expected shortfall
- Building our own factor model (correlations)
- And others.
- Will use as part of challenge process for Group
allocation produce and then to allocate agreed
capital to netting pool/trade level and own alpha
estimation.