Top Down and Bottom Up Capital Allocation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Top Down and Bottom Up Capital Allocation

Description:

Securities Financing Transactions (repos etc) ABS investments. 4 ... Calibrates stochastic models for PFE / EPE Calculator ... EPE Calculator. Calculates PFE, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: ph4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Top Down and Bottom Up Capital Allocation


1
Top Down and Bottom Up Capital Allocation
Colin Burke, Credit Modelling
2
Contents
  • Treasurys Portfolio
  • Risk Platform Project
  • Bottom up economic capital calculation
  • Bottom-up economic capital allocation
  • Relationship with ICAAP
  • Challenges and obstacles
  • This talk focuses on Treasurys plan for a
    bottom-up capital allocation and how this
    interacts with a top down allocation.

3
Treasurys Portfolio
  • HBOS Treasury Services (HBOTS) is the Treasury
    Services arm of the HBOS Group
  • It provides funding for the Group and hedges for
    the Group and its clients
  • The HBOSTS portfolio consists of
  • Bonds (bank and government), CDs, CP etc
  • Money Market (loans, deposits)
  • Derivatives (interest rate, FX, equity, commodity
    and credit)
  • Securities Financing Transactions (repos etc)
  • ABS investments

4
Risk Platform Project (i)
Scope
  • Market Risk deliver a platform for CAD 2
  • Credit Risk deliver a platform for credit
    exposures, economic capital and stress testing.
  • An economic capital model is only as good as its
    inputs PD, LGD, exposures, correlations
  • gt stress testing functionality for credit risk
  • gt credit exposure in IMM (derivatives and SFT)
  • gt back testing of IMM exposures
  • gt credit economic capital for derivative and
    non-derivative trades

5
Risk Platform Project (ii)
  • System selection process
  • Request for Proposals (RFPs) were issued on
    February 23rd 2005 with a requested reply date of
    March 24th 2005
  • Following preliminary choice of the risk engine
    and market data solutions, a seven week proof of
    concept started on the 24th of August 2005.
    Included comparison to HBOSTS own calculations,
    theoretical review, technology review etc

6
Risk Platform Project (iii)
  • Project Definition Report produced in early 2006
    defining key required enhancements for credit
    risk under the following headings
  • Credit Exposure (IMM)
  • Stress and Back Testing
  • Economic Capital (see later)
  • Project has begun. For Credit Risk initial work
    was the testing of credit exposure
  • MTM unit and bulk tests (comparison with front
    office system)
  • PFE/EPE unit and bulk tests (comparison with our
    own models)

7
Risk Platform Project (iiia)
Example PFE tests
Unit Test (CDS)
Bulk test (portfolio of 20 swaps)
8
Risk Platform Project (iv)
  • Vendor Components
  • Data Consolidation Module
  • receives, cleans and stores market data
  • Market Risk Engine
  • Bootstraps yield curves
  • Market Risk Calcs CAD 2 calculation (VaR) etc
  • Stress Testing for Credit and Market Risk
  • Calibrates stochastic models for PFE / EPE
    Calculator
  • Calculates and allocates EC (including use of EPE
    profiles)
  • PFE / EPE Calculator
  • Calculates PFE, Expected Exposure, EPE etc
  • Incorporates correlation, netting and collateral
    effects

9
Risk Platform Project (v)
Front Office Systems
Bloomberg
etc
Reuters
Trade data
Data Consolidator
Market Risk Engine/ Parameter Generator
Cleaned market data
Trade data Market data Stochastic Parameters
PFE / EPE Analytics
10
Risk Platform Project (vi)
11
Economic Capital Enhancements (i)
  • Key enhancements for economic capital include
  • Using vendor application to implement internally
    defined credit worthiness factor models (no
    reliance on vendors proprietary approaches). This
    gives default correlation.
  • Vendor-based Economic Capital Engine will give
    time of default. A multi-period model.
  • Economic Capital allocated on basis of Expected
    Shortfall. Total Capital calculated as CVaR. Can
    allocate in different parts of loss distribution

12
Economic Capital Enhancements (ii)
  • Building our own factor model
  • Leverages from market VaR model statistics set
  • For Credit this is normally used to calibrate the
    stochastic process for derivative exposure e.g.
    mean reversions and instantaneous volatilities
    for Hull-White interest model, drift and
    volatility in GBM and correlations between risk
    factors

13
Economic Capital Enhancements (iii)
14
Economic Capital Enhancements (iv)
  • The basic infrastructure to build a CreditMetrics
    style factor model already exists (CreditMetrics
    uses equity values as a proxy for asset values)
    Use linear factor model for credit worthiness or
    ability to pay process
  • To use VaR Statistics Sets we need to add
    industry and country breakdowns for each
    counterparty
  • We also need to use a longer history of data than
    we would normally use for credit exposure

15
Economic Capital Enhancements (v)
  • Time of default. Why is it important? Consider
    the following EPE profile
  • A default today (01/06/2006) has zero exposure.
    A default around June 2011 has maximum exposure
  • If default occurs, we are not indifferent to its
    timing
  • Conventional economic capital models do not give
    the time of default or assumes at the single risk
    horizon (usually one year from today)
  • See bottom up calculation for illustration

16
Bottom Up Capital Calculation (i)
  • Inputs
  • Non-derivatives trades (bonds, CP etc) input
    into market risk engine at trade level
  • Derivatives and SFT input EPE profile from
    analytics engine at the netting pool level into
    the market risk engine.
  • Market risk engine forms factor model
    (correlation)
  • Combine with Basel II PDs and LGDs. PDs are term
    structure of PDs entered via a transition matrix
  • Credit spreads by rating (for effects of MTM
    moves in non-default states)

17
Bottom Up Capital Calculation (ii)
  • Modelling Approach
  • Monte Carlo Simulation
  • Time of default due to multi-time step
    simulation. Uses ideas from Hull and Whites
    credit derivative methodology

Asset Value
etc...
Barrier 2

Barrier 3
Defaulted
Time
Today
H2
H1
Barrier 1
18
Bottom Up Capital Calculation (iii)
  • Output (i) Portfolio Loss distribution and
    portfolio capital i.e. a Treasury estimate of
    Treasurys economic capital

Expected Loss
Probability
Economic Capital
Loss
19
Bottom Up Capital Calculation (iv)
  • Output (ii)
  • Capital to each trade/netting pool
  • Sum of allocated capital equals total capital

Risk Appetite
Shortfall
Economic Capital
Probability
Loss
20
Using The Economic Capital (i)
  • Treasury only context
  • Concentration analysis
  • EC limits
  • RAROC / performance measurement
  • Pricing advice
  • Own alpha estimation (IMM)
  • Plan to run Economic Capital calculations and IMM
    calculations daily
  • Typical pricing advice relates to swap
    transactions conducted for customers of Corporate
    Bank. Currently use an EPE/market implied
    approach. Risk Platform will supplement this with
    EPE/RAROC approach

21
Using The Economic Capital (ii)
Example Consider an interest rate swap with a
risky-counterpart. The risky counterparty
exposure is given by
Vrisky Vriskless EL where
  • The contribution of the credit spread to economic
    capital is reflected in two ways
  • A component due to credit migration (via changes
    in the marginal default probabilities above) and,
  • Changes due to simulated market rates as the
    counterparty portfolio ages to the risk horizon
    i.e. a forward value of EL(t)

22
Relationship with ICAAP
  • Current plans are for Group to allocate capital
    to business on Basel II basis
  • Plan to use Risk Platform as part of challenge
    process to the Group allocation
  • Once the allocation to Treasury is agreed, use
    Risk Platform to allocate agreed capital to trade
    and netting pool level

23
Relationship with ICAAP
  • Some challenges
  • Model Differences Our Treasury model differs
    from the wider model in terms of its modelling
    approach
  • Data Our Treasury model differs in terms of its
    default correlation source
  • Diversification The Treasury model will show our
    one portfolio in isolation.

24
Summary
  • HBOS Treasury are implementing a credit and
    market risk Risk Engine
  • For Credit Risk, this performs IMM and Economic
    Capital calculations and is the exposure stress
    testing engine
  • Key enhancements for economic capital include
  • Time of default
  • Capital Allocation based on expected shortfall
  • Building our own factor model (correlations)
  • And others.
  • Will use as part of challenge process for Group
    allocation produce and then to allocate agreed
    capital to netting pool/trade level and own alpha
    estimation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com