Manufacturing Strategy MGSC 602 Prof' Saibal Ray - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Manufacturing Strategy MGSC 602 Prof' Saibal Ray

Description:

Cited more and more frequently by operations managers. Response to ... A Definition ... Severe recession. 2-5 plants (machines) associated with a pulp mill ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: natt3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Manufacturing Strategy MGSC 602 Prof' Saibal Ray


1
Manufacturing StrategyMGSC 602Prof. Saibal Ray
  • Module 1 - Designing, Managing and Improving
    Operations Processes
  • Management of Operations Flexibility
  • Handout 3
  • Session 4

2
Operations Flexibility
  • Key Revenue generating performance feature
  • Increasingly important in operations
  • Cited more and more frequently by operations
    managers
  • Response to heightened competition
  • Services and Manufacturing
  • A vague term akin to Quality

3
Taxonomies of Flexibility
  • Machine Flexibility
  • Process Flexibility
  • Product Flexibility
  • Volume Flexibility
  • Routing Flexibility
  • Problem with this taxonomy

4
What do we mean by Flexibility in Operations?
5
A Definition
  • Flexibility is the ability to initiate or adapt
    to change with little effort, time or penalty

6
Help Wanted
  • Flexible interpreters
  • What changes?
  • How often?
  • What kind of flexibility is important?
  • Range?
  • Uniformity across the range?
  • Mobility?

7
Flexibility can be both
  • Internal inside the firm
  • Capabilities (Quick Changeovers, Rapid Ramp Up)
  • External the markets view
  • Competitive advantage perceived (Quick Response,
    Broad Product Range)

8
Matching Flexibility to Competitive Advantage
  • Internal Flexibility can provide other forms of
    competitive advantage
  • e.g. flexibility to select from lowest cost
    source material
  • External flexibility can be provided through
    methods other than internal flexibility
  • e.g. multiple focused plants to provide full range

9
Matching Internal Flexibility and Competitive
Advantage
  • Competitive
  • Edge (external)
  • Customized
  • Product
  • Quick
  • Response
  • Broad Product
  • Range
  • Method used
  • Modular design
  • Or a flexible manufacturing system
  • Inventory, channel management
  • Or a flexible manufacturing system
  • Multiple, focused cells, plants
  • Or a flexible manufacturing system

10
Key Questions
  • Each of these manufacturing systems is
    flexible
  • How do they differ from one another?
  • How can one define a type of internal flexibility
    in general

11
Framework for Flexibility
  • Need to answer three fundamental questions
  • Change or adapt to what?
  • How often?
  • What form of flexibility?

12
A Framework
  • What changes? e.g.
  • Product
  • Volume
  • Size
  • How often?
  • By the minute, within a day (operational)
  • Seasonal, monthly (tactical)
  • Yearly, multi-year (strategic)

13
What form of flexibility?
  • Range
  • Uniformity
  • Mobility

14
Range
  • Paper from 24 lb to 32 lb
  • May need to increase to 20 lb to 40 lb
  • can be distance or number of options

15
Uniformity
  • Every plant has a sweet-spot
  • Performance across the Range

16
Uniform implies more flexible
  • Flatter performance profile, more flexible

17
Mobility
  • Average Color Change Time 30 minutes
  • Reducing it to 15 minutes would increase mobility
    within the range

18
Matching Internal Flexibilities to Competitive
Priorities
  • Operational, Product Flexibility
  • Customization - Range/Mobility
  • Quick Response - Mobility
  • Broad Product Line - Range/Uniformity of
    Performance

19
An example Paper
  • Dimension Product
  • Frequency Hourly
  • Kind of Flexibility Range, Mobility

20
Two-year Study
  • Fine paper industry
  • Process-based
  • Severe recession
  • 2-5 plants (machines) associated with a pulp mill
  • Almost everyone needs to be more flexible
  • Cant compete on cost anymore

21
Increasing Scale
22
Study of Sixty Plants Capabilities
  • Used company records, interviews and observation
    to measure
  • RANGE of the plants (basis weight range)
  • MOBILITY of the plants (changeover times)
  • (both operational forms of flexibility on the
    product dimension)
  • Basic process is the same, pressures are similar
    on each company
  • What determines the plants flexibility?

23
Large Differences in Flexibility
  • Mobility
  • Between 1 minute and 4 hours
  • No one aware of where they stood relative to
    competitors
  • Range
  • Some plants could make 30 times the range of
    process variation than others

24
What might cause these differences?
  • Scale
  • Speed, Width
  • Output Rate (Tons)
  • Age
  • Of installation
  • Of last major rebuild
  • Computer Integration
  • For process control
  • For flexibility (e.g. auto changeovers)

25
What might cause these differences?
  • Workforce
  • Experience
  • Degree of cross-training
  • Managerial Emphasis
  • On uniformity (making all grades well)
  • On quick-changeovers
  • On producing a large range of products

26
Computer Integration Automation
  • What we found
  • No positive relationship between any form of
    Computer Integration and Operational Flexibility
  • Often a quick-fix to the problem - we are
    doing something
  • Reasons for limiting RANGE
  • Reasons for limiting MOBILITY
  • Even CIM aimed at improving flexibility didnt
    (though no plant could tell they didnt have
    measures)

27
Example FMS Technology
  • Many companies found FMS gave disappointing
    results
  • Bought the wrong type of flexibility
  • Bought Ability to change within an existing
    group of products
  • Needed Ability to change the group of products
    made

28
The Effect of Scale
  • Scale of a process generally limited the range of
    things it could do
  • BUT weak relationship between scale and
    mobility
  • Small-scale processes often just as difficult to
    changeover AFTER controlling for other things
  • No reason to assume that even a large-scale
    process cannot produce Just-In-Time if it
    gets practice

29
Age of Equipment
  • New equipment often focused on a small range of
    products
  • Old equipment tends to be used more flexibly
  • BUT its worse at the job!
  • OLD equipment is less flexible after you take
    other things into account (such as scale)

30
Experience of the Workforce
  • More experienced crews are able to make a broader
    range of things experience counts
  • BUT
  • Experience is associated with much worse mobility
  • More experienced crews much slower at switching
    between products
  • Less likely to come up with mobility innovations

31
The most important factor
  • Managerial Emphasis
  • Flexible plants were those in which management
    had emphasized the importance of flexibility
  • Through improvement schemes
  • By measuring flexibility
  • By encouraging people to find new ways of doing
    things
  • Applied to both range and mobility

32
Flexibility A self-fulfilling prophecy
  • Flexible plants are those that get the practice
  • Managers assign quick-response jobs and
    broad-range work to flexible plants
  • So, they get the practice
  • Because they get the practice
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com