Manufacturing Strategy MGSC 602 Prof. Saibal Ray - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Manufacturing Strategy MGSC 602 Prof. Saibal Ray

Description:

Designing, Managing and Improving Operations. Process Design, Management and Improvement ... Single, parochial measures [no idea about competitors] Upcoming mismatch ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:353
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Ray4190
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Manufacturing Strategy MGSC 602 Prof. Saibal Ray


1
Manufacturing StrategyMGSC 602Prof. Saibal Ray
  • Module 3 Designing and Implementing Operations
    Improvement Strategies
  • Module Wrap-Up
  • Handout 7

2
Designing, Managing and Improving Operations
  • Process Design, Management and Improvement
  • Operations Systems and Information Technology
  • Designing and Implementing Improvement Strategies

3
List of Cases
  • Integron Inc. The ICD Division
  • ATT Universal Card Services Operation
  • Daewoo Shipbuilding and Heavy Machinery
  • Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries
  • HMS Thetis and Apollo XIII
  • PPG Berea Developing a Self-Directed Workforce
  • Vickers Inc. (Omaha Plant)
  • Deloitte and Touche Consulting Group
  • Pacific Dunlop Beijing
  • Micom Caribe

4
Operations Level Improvement as the key to
continued competitiveness
  • Mechanisms for Change
  • Everyone catches up so the winner becomes a
    qualifier
  • Competitor develops unheard of performance on a
    qualifier

5
Some fundamental questions
  • Are plants efficient in manufacturing
    performance?
  • Evidence implies not
  • Is the individual firm subject to a tradeoff in
    performance dimensions (improvement as
    positioning) Quality is Free?
  • c. Can you improve on multiple dimensions at
    once?
  • Daewoo architectural
  • understanding but difficult

6
World Class
  • The idea of World Class provides a practice and
    performance beacon for plants like ?
  • Not helpful for plants like
  • ? they create the (moving) frontier
  • Dangerous for plants like
  • ? they dont think about strategy
  • More important - what to be World Class at?
  • Why try to imitate set the standard for World
    Class

World Class Frontier
7
Positioners and Improvers Two philosophies at
odds that need not be
Competitive Dimension 2
  • Positioners argue that
  • world-class ignores strategic positioning
  • plants like ? cant exist
  • Improvers argue that
  • world-class is inherently a lagging strategy
  • and that positioners ignore operations innovation
    as a source of advantage
  • Plants need to do both!
  • Need for an Improvement Strategy...

Improvers
Positioners
?
World Class Frontier
Competitive Dimension 1
8
  • Operational effectiveness is a necessary
    condition, but is not sufficient
  • Strategic Intent and Insights are important in
    developing a successful strategy
  • The solution is to continually learn (very
    difficult) and develop capabilities that will not
    only help in the present market but also will
    open up new markets

9
Learning How to Learn
  • We know firms have capabilities
  • But they also have specific ways to change
    capabilities
  • Samsung, Daewoo showed us that operations learn
    how to learn, and can then get stuck in that
    improvement mode
  • Core capabilities can become core rigidities
  • A dilemma
  • Should you learn the way youve always done it
    (you know that way best)
  • ..Or glean the advantages from a way you dont
    know, but that may hold great opportunity

10
How to Learn?
  • Systematic problem solving
  • Experimentation
  • Learning from past experience
  • Learning from others
  • Transferring knowledge

11
Absorptive Capacity
  • The ability to assimilate and use new knowledge
  • It requires prior knowledge some related and
    some not related
  • Two features of absorptive capacity
    cumulativeness and effect on expectation
    formation
  • Failure in developing absorptive capacity leads
    to lock-out
  • Developing capabilities requires absorptive
    capacity which requires continuous learning

12
Diagnosis of an Operation
  • Role
  • What stage is the plant in?
  • What is the role of the plant?
  • Structural alignment (Fit)
  • Executional Performance (Control)
  • Improvement Strategy and Rate

13
Levels of Capability
  • SSTAGE 1 Internally Neutral (Make it, deliver
    it, without messing up too badly)
  • SSTAGE 2 Externally Neutral (We are as good as
    our competitors plants of this kind)
  • SSTAGE 3 Internally Supportive (We are shaped to
    provide clear, credible support to our firms
    competitive strategy)
  • SSTAGE 4 Externally Supportive (This plant is a
    significant contributor to our competitive
    position)

14
Role, Fit
  • How do they define their role?
  • How do they define success does it fit with the
    competitive strategy?
  • How is the business changing?
  • Looking for
  • Single, parochial measures no idea about
    competitors
  • Upcoming mismatch
  • Physical measures Profit is a lagging indicator

15
Is it in control?
  • Control is a necessary condition for improvement
  • Indicators
  • Inventory management
  • Rush orders/expediting
  • Talk to the folks
  • Do they know whats going on? Training?
  • Shared Values
  • Housekeeping
  • Too many buffers
  • Scheme of the Week suggests lack of long-term
    control

16
Improvement (Operations) Strategy
  • Context (Why)
  • Goals (What)
  • Focus (Where, What level)
  • Tools, Methods (Using what?)
  • Resource (How much, What kind)
  • Organization Phasing
  • Learning Capture

17
The Seven Elements of an Improvement Strategy
Element Issues Examples
  • 1. Context Why is the improvement needed? Change
    in customer needs,
  • change in winners/qualifiers,
  • new competitor
  • 2. Goals What dimensions or performance Bring
    average lead time to 4
  • will be improved? How will they days Bring
    manufactured
  • be measured? Cost to 400/ton
  • 3. Focus What will be the primary
    areas Manufacturing processes,
  • of attack? Coordinative processes,
  • sourcing
  • 4. Methods and What methods will be used? Total
    Quality, SPC, SMED,
  • Techniques JIT, MRP, self-directed
  • workteams, etc.
  • 5. Resources How much money? How many 200k, 15
    people, 24 months
  • people? How much time? with 6 month
    milestones

18
Benefits of an Explicit Operations Strategy
  • Guiding project selection
  • Providing continuity
  • Building predictability
  • Allowing changes in direction to be made explicit

19
Maybe well begin to see fewer of these
  • This operation will be a high quality, low cost
    facility providing outstanding flexibility and
    customer service. We commit to generating the
    most innovative products at the leading-edge of
    technology. We pride ourselves on safety and care
    for the environment. We will strive to be
    world-class on every dimension.
  • The strategic Planning Team please post

20
  • But where do I start?
  • Six ideas

21
1. Concentrate on a sub-Area of Operations
  • Functional Improvement
  • Variety of Criteria for Selection
  • Area of weakness (e.g. inventory or factory cost)
  • Area of opportunity (e.g. workforce problem
    solving)
  • Area for corporate-wide concern (e.g. quality,
    flexibility)
  • Area of major decision (e.g. automation project)
  • Build grass roots support
  • Fundamentally change the way work gets done

22
2. Demonstrate what can be done
  • Demonstration Project
  • Tackle a major project involving several
    functions
  • Provide a credible demonstration of how it
    would work in your organization
  • Focus attention and resources to realize a
    significant success
  • Set new standards for expectations performance,
    procedure and rewards
  • Revise systems and procedures to prevent
    backsliding and encourage new behaviors

23
3. Establish an external comparison process
  • Continuous Benchmarking
  • Expose people to the outside world so they can
    see the success
  • Competitive Benchmarking
  • E.g. Daewoos physical benchmarks
  • Customer Feedback Systems
  • But remember to be careful about competitive
    convergence the comparison should be very
    specific depending on what is the focus of the
    organization

24
4. Pursue a Comprehensive Operations Strategy
  • Operations Strategy Restructure
  • Assess past pattern of operating decisions
  • Determine which patterns need to be changed to
    fit the business strategy/provide distinctive
    advantage
  • Identify what drives those patterns
  • Pursue a systematic change in the drivers

25
5. Business Process Improvement
  • Re-engineering
  • Focus on Processes across existing business
    functions
  • Fundamental
  • Radical
  • Dramatic
  • Focus on Processes (not departments) very
    appropriate now
  • A Clean sheet approach vs. Technology driven
    (SAP case)
  • One of many such approaches over the years

26
6. Grass-Roots improvement
  • Empowerment
  • Focus on training at the lowest levels in the
    organization
  • Push decision making down
  • Very hard to do well BS by the truckload
  • Post-rationalized recognized after the fact
  • How much empowerment how much autonomy how
    much decision-making

27
Contrasting Approaches to Getting Started
  • Approach Advantages Disadvantages
  • 1. Series of sub-areas of Broad Based
    Support - Operations only
  • operations Correct Principles
    - Slow, lacks momentum
  • 2. Business-Wide Multifunctional
    - Discounted as not
  • Demonstration Project Dramatic,
    visible results normal
  • - Systems left unchanged
  • 3. External Comparison External, objective
    - Difficult to make
  • Processes reference
    permanent
  • Source of new ideas - Assumes
    organization
  • can/will utilize results

28
Contrasting Approaches
  • Approach Advantages Disadvantages
  • 4. Comprehensive Senior Operating Focus
    - Requires
  • Operations Strategy Plan Logical
    Implementation
  • - Doesnt spread
    easily
  • 5. Reengineering Process-based - more
    - Step Change-based
  • appropriate
  • - Minimal Focus on
    Learning
  • 6. Grass-roots Build Skills at the
    - Can meander badly
  • Improvement lowest levels in the
    - Structure is a key
  • organization

29
The Challenge
?
The Sputtering Heroes We fought fifteen 1
year Wars not a 15 year war.
Act of Faith I think I can I think I can
Improvement Planning I know I can. I designed
it that way.
30
DMIO
  • Process Design and Improvement
  • (Solagen, DAV, Cummins)
  • (2) Systems
  • (the new toolbox Kanebo
  • DEC Endpoint, FASTech, Crane)
  • (3) Improvement
  • choice of method and implementation
  • (Daewoo, Samsung, PPG, Micom)

31
Characteristics of Effective Leaders of Change in
Operations
  • Establish an encompassing, articulated direction
    for the operation
  • Set the agenda and focus the operations
    attention and effort
  • Teach knowledge and skills throughout the ranks
  • Wholesale distribution of decision-making to
    people not just lowest ranks
  • Personal commitment to leading the change

32
WORD OF CAUTION
  • Remember that no competitive advantage will last
    forever
  • What seems most rational today will look foolish
    tomorrow
  • We can only hope to extend the reign as long as
    possible by developing capabilities and strategic
    positioning
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com