Title: Planning for Nutrition Investment in Uzbekistan
1Planning for Nutrition Investment in Uzbekistan
- Jack Bagriansky
- UNICEF Consultant
2Negative Cycle of Malnutrition Poverty
Malnutrition
Poor Birth Outcome
Poverty
Work Deficit
Poor Health
School Deficit
Cognitive Deficit
Learning Deficit
3Measuring Economic Impact of Malnutrition
- Science and evidence-base for many indicators of
malnutrition, is sufficiently concrete and
specific for summary coefficients of risk or
deficit. - Deficit, Relative Risk or other factors.
- Computer modeling links coefficients of
risk/deficit to national demographic, health,
labor and financial data to project national
economic damage of various indicators of
malnutrition. - Consequence Model Cost of Status Quo
- Global Results Show High Benefit Cost Ratios For
Nutrition Interventions. - UNICEF Damage Assessment Reports
- Copenhagen Consensus
4Annual Cost of Doing Nothing
5Nutrition Investment Program Building the
Economic Case
Economic Value
3-Year Objectives Projected Impact
Describing Budgeting Intervention
Analysis Consensus on National Economic Losses
Build on Consensus on Prevalence
6 7 8Defined Intervention Target Group
Multiple Causes/Strategies
Value on Human Life?
9Strategic Steps Making Economic Case for
Investment in Nutrition
Economic Value
3-Year Objectives
Describing Budgeting Intervention
Analysis Consensus on Economic Losses
Consensus on Prevalence Rationale
10Missing Steps to Credible CaseImplementation
Orientation
Economic Value
Focusing on Interventions
Clear Objectives 3-Year Budget Implementation
Plan Based on Capacity Defined Interventions
Focusing on Problems.
Prevalence, Loss Rationale
11Defined Intervention Portfolio Programs Mix
At Risk Population
Market/Public Financing
Public Financing
Flour Fortification Salt Iodization
12Implementation Focus Planning w/Logical
Framework Budget
Output
Activity
Budgeted Task
13(No Transcript)
14Multi-Intervention Portfolio Summary 3-Year
Budget
15Strategic Steps Making Economic Case for
Investment in Nutrition
Economic Value
3-Year Objectives Projected Impact
Describing Budgeting Intervention
Analysis Consensus on Economic Losses
Consensus on Prevalence Rationale
16Intervention Goal or Impact
17Analysis Program Coverage Objectives
18Analysis for Program Coverage Objectives ENS
19(No Transcript)
20Evidence-Based Goal for Impact
21Evidence-Based Goals for Impact Essential
Nutrition Services
22Strategic Steps Making Economic Case for
Investment in Nutrition
Economic Value
3-Year Objectives
Describing Budgeting Intervention
Analysis Consensus on Economic Losses
Consensus on Prevalence Rationale
23Calculating Economic Value6-Year Benefit Cost
Ratio
Benefit Cost Ratio
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26Summary 6-Year Benefit Cost
27Success is not the NIP Document but Results
Increased Investment
- Not the Numbers But the Process
- Data Gathering Reviewing Global Best Practice
- Agreeing on Estimates Assumptions
- Designing Budgeting Interventions
- Not the Numbers But the Consensus
- Multi Sectoral Consultation of Public Private
Sectors - Harmonized View of Health Economic Experts
- Not the Numbers But a Policy Tool
- Leverage Investment within Competitive
Environment - Not Reality but Projections
- Moral Imperative not only Economic Benefit