The History of Management Thought - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

The History of Management Thought

Description:

The behavioral/social scientists were trained differently in ... Charisma re-emerges in ... Is charisma too unstable for organizational continuity, as Max ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: juliat4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The History of Management Thought


1
The History of Management Thought
  • By
  • Julia Teahen and Regina Greenwood

Based on The History of Management Thought, 5th
edition, 2005 by Daniel A. Wren
2
Part Four
  • The Modern Era

3
Chapter Twenty
  • Organizational Behavior
  • and Theory

4
Organizational Behavior and Theory
  • People and Organizations
  • Organizations and People

5
Gordon Howell Report 1959
  • Triggered more interest in the behavioral and
    social sciences
  • The behavioral/social scientists were trained
    differently in research methods and drew on a
    different body of literature.
  • Human relations thought was modified by these
    behavioral scientists, providing for a transition
    from human relations to organizational behavior.

6
Keith Davis (1918-2002) Mr. Human Relations
  • Acts as a transition point for human relations
    and organizational behavior.
  • Defined human relations as the integration of
    people into a work situation in a way that
    motivates them to work together productively,
    cooperatively, and with economic, psychological,
    and social satisfaction.
  • Modern Human Relations Two Facets
  • Organizational behavior
  • Human relations

7
Chris Argyris (1923 -
  • Influenced by the humanist approach of Abraham
    Maslow and the socio-technical process of E.
    Wight Bakke.
  • Indicated his feelings about how organizations
    neglected human needs.

Chris Argyris
courtesy of the University of Western Ontario
8
Chris Argyris Personality vs. Organization
  • Certain organizational practices, such as the
    division of labor, interfered with the
    development of health human personalities.
  • These practices promoted immature, not mature
    behavior.
  • In an attempt to self-actualize, individuals ran
    into the obstacles posed by formal organizations.
  • The result was defensive behaviors, with
    management reacting by becoming more autocratic
    or by turning to sugar-coated human relations.

9
Chris Argyris
10
Douglas McGregor (1906-1964)
  • Taught psychology at MIT.
  • At Antioch College, McGregor found that his
    classroom teaching of human relations did not
    always work in practice.
  • From these experiences, his ideas evolve and lead
    him to recognize the influence of assumptions we
    make about people and our managerial style.

Douglas McGregor Courtesy of University of
Western Ontario
11
Theory X
  • Management is responsible for organizing the
    elements of productive enterprise money,
    materials, equipment, people in the interest of
    economic ends.
  • With respect to people, this is a process of
    directing their efforts, motivating them,
    controlling their actions, modifying their
    behavior to fit the needs of the organization.
  • Without this active intervention by management,
    people would be passive even resistant to
    organizational needs. They must, therefore, be
    persuaded, rewarded, punished, controlled their
    activities must be directed. This is
    managements task -- in managing subordinate
    managers or workers. We often sum it up by
    saying that management consists of getting things
    done through other people.

12
Theory X (continued)
  • Behind this conventional theory there are several
    additional beliefs less explicit, but
    widespread
  • The average man is by nature indolent he works
    as little as possible.
  • He lacks ambition, dislikes responsibility,
    prefers to be led.
  • He is inherently self-centered, indifferent to
    organizational needs.
  • He is by nature resistant to change.
  • He is gullible, not very bright the ready dupe
    of the charlatan and the demagogue.

13
Theory Y
  • Management is responsible for organizing the
    elements of productive enterprise money,
    materials, equipment, people in the interest of
    economic ends.
  • People are not by nature passive or resistant to
    organizational needs. They have become so as a
    result of experience in organizations.
  • The motivation, the potential for development,
    the capacity for assuming responsibility, the
    readiness to direct behavior toward
    organizational goals are all present in people.
    Management does not put them there. It is a
    responsibility of management to make it possible
    for people to recognize and develop these human
    characteristics for themselves.
  • The essential task of management is to arrange
    organizational conditions and methods of
    operation so that people can achieve their own
    goals best by directing their own efforts toward
    organizational objectives.

14
Theory X Theory Y
  • Work is inherently distasteful to most people.
  • Most people are not ambitious, have little desire
    for responsibility, and prefer to be directed.
  • Most people have little capacity for creativity
    in solving organizational problems.
  • Motivation occurs only at the physiological and
    safety levels.
  • Most people must be closely controlled and often
    coerced to achieve organizational objectives.
  • Work is as natural as play, if the conditions are
    favorable.
  • Self-control is often indispensable in achieving
    organizational goals.
  • The capacity for creativity in solving
    organizational problems is widely distributed in
    the population.
  • Motivation occurs at the social, esteem, and
    self-actualization levels, as well as
    physiological and security levels.
  • People can be self-directed and creative at work
    if properly motivated.

15
Personnel/Human Resource Management
  • Human Resource Management did not always receive
    the attention it deserved. An example is the
    Gordon and Howells 1959 assessment of personnel
    management.
  • John R. commons was the first to use the phrase
    human resource.
  • E. Wight Bakke appears to be the first person to
    cast personnel in a human resources framework.

16
Personnel/Human Resource Management
  • Wendell French was the first to add human
    resources to a personnel management text.
  • The contributions of George Strauss, Leonard
    Sayles, and Thomas Kochan have enriched human
    resource management literature by noting it is
    complementary to industrial relations.

17
Frederick Herzberg (1923-2000)
  • His research emphasized job enrichment (depth)
    rather than job enlargement
  • Job context (hygiene factors) needed to be
    optimal to prevent job dissatisfaction. These
    factors (according to Herzberg) did not motivate.
  • Job content (motivators) factors that did lead
    to motivation
  • Money (according to Herzberg) could motivate if
    it was seen as a reward for accomplishment but
    if money was given without regard for merit, then
    it was a hygiene factor.

Frederick Herzberg
18
Motivation and Hygiene Factors
HYGIENE FACTORS ENVIRONMENT
MOTIVATORS WHAT THEY DO
Achievement Recognition for Accomplishment Challen
ging Work Increased Responsibility Growth and
Development
Policies and Administration Supervision Working
Conditions Interpersonal Relations Money, Status,
Security
19
Frederick Herzberg
20
Motivation and Hygiene Factors
THE JOB SURROUNDINGS AND THE HYGIENE FACTORS
SUPERVISION
WORKING CONDITIONS
RESPONSIBILITY
ACHIEVEMENT
BENEFITS
THE JOB ITSELF AND THE MOTIVATOR FACTORS
COMPANY POLICY AND ADMINIS- TRATION
INTER- PERSONAL RELATION- SHIPS
WORK ITSELF
RECOGNITION
GROWTH
ADVANCEMENT
SECURITY
STATUS
SALARY
21
Work Design
  • Richard Hackman, Edward Lawler, and Greg Oldhams
    work extended Herzbergs notions by adding a
    situational (it depends) dimension
  • Key job characteristics
  • Depending on an individuals growth-need
    strength, these characteristics could be
    amplified to make the job more meaningful.

22
Motivation Expectancy Theory Victor Vroom
  • The expectancy theory of Victor Vroom helps
    explain the choosing process among individuals in
    terms of the value (valence) of the reward and
    the expectancy of receiving the reward.

Victor Vroom
23
Expectancy Theory
24
Expectancy Theory
  • Lyman Porter and Edward Lawler extended Vrooms
    work with their model of expectancy.

25
Expectancy Theory (Lyman W. Porter Edward E.
Lawler III)
Revised Diagram of the Theoretical Model
SOURCE Managerial Attitudes and Performance,
1968, Richard D. Irwin Inc.
26
Equity Theory
  • Equity theory is not a new one but focuses on how
    individuals perceive their reward or pay compared
    to what others are receiving.
  • Issues of social justice and distributive justice
    are involved in the theories of Stacy Adams and
    Elliot Jaques.

Elliot Jacques
27
Edwin Locke Goal Setting Theory
  • Over a 35 year period, research has demonstrated
    its practical and theoretical value.
  • Money is a motivator because of its
    instrumentality or as an economist would say,
    money is a medium of exchange for the things we
    want.
  • Goal setting theory is rooted in the work of
    Taylor, the Gilbreths, Drucker, Cecil Mace, and
    Thomas Ryan.
  • Individuals need specific rather than general
    goals.

Edwin Locke
History of Management Thought by D. Wren
28
Edwin Locke Goal Setting Theory
  • The goals should be challenging but not exceed
    the persons ability.
  • Performance feedback is essential.
  • Goal-setting by management works best when people
    are already internally motivated by a need to
    achieve.
  • Participative goal-setting works best for
    individuals with a lower need for achievement,
    and when they are familiar and at ease with
    participative management techniques.
  • Goal-setting is related to self-efficacy in terms
    of how goals are chosen and how results are fed
    back.

29
LeadershipRensis Likert (1903-1981)
  • Leadership is a part of general management theory
  • Likert proposed four types of leadership termed
    System 1-4.

Rensis Likert
30
LeadershipRensis Likert
  • The key to good leadership, according to Likert,
    is to move toward System 4 by
  • The principle of supportive relationships
  • The use of group decision making and supervision.
    Link pins is important here.
  • Setting high performance goals
  • System 5 was further developed by Jane Gibson
    Likert influenced by Mary Parker Follett.

31
Fred Fiedler Situational or Contingent
Leadership Theories
  • Fiedler suggested that leadership style "depends"
    or is contingent upon certain leader orientations
    and situational characteristics
  • LPC scale to measure leadership style
  • Situational factors of
  • Leader-member relation
  • Task structure
  • Position power, meaning formal authority

Fred Fielder
32
Situational Leadership
33
Situational Leadership
  • Depending on the situation, high LPC or
    relationships-oriented leaders fared best in
    situations that were intermediate in
    favorableness.
  • Low LPC leaders tended to perform better in
    either very favorable or very unfavorable
    situations.

34
(No Transcript)
35
Fiedler Investigations of Leadership
Group Situation
Leadership Style Correlating with Effectiveness
Task Structure
Position Power
Leader-Member Relations
Condition
1 Good Structured Strong Directive 2 Good Struct
ured Weak Directive 3 Good Unstructured Strong Di
rective 4 Good Unstructured Weak Permissive 5 Mo
derately poor Structured Strong Permissive 6 Mode
rately poor Structured Weak No data 7 Moderately
poor Unstructured Strong No relationship
found 8 Moderately poor Unstructured Weak Dir
ective
36
Leadership Theories
  • Bob House and Gary Desslers path-goal theory
    focuses more on the role of the leader in
    identifying peoples needs and providing means
    for subordinates to satisfy those needs. The
    difference in this notion, contrasted with
    Fiedler, is that the same leader could be task or
    relationship oriented.

37
Leadership Theories
  • Charisma re-emerges in modern theory.
  • Charismatic leaders may attract followers for
    evil ends (Hitler, Bin Laden, etc.)
  • Transformational leadership also reflects the
    trend toward personality traits of leaders.
  • Is charisma too unstable for organizational
    continuity, as Max Weber suggests?

38
Leadership Theories
  • James McGregor Burns transactional and
    transformational leadership also reflects the
    trend toward personality traits of leaders.
  • George Graen and leader-member exchange theory
    has enriched our study of interpersonal
    relations.
  • Leader-member exchange theory furthers
    understanding of intra-organizational
    connections.

39
Organizations and People
  • Organizations as Open Systems
  • Chester Barnards idea of the organization as
    including investors, suppliers, etc. was an early
    example of viewing the organization as an open
    system.
  • Ludwig von Bertalanffys (1901-1972) system
    theory furthered the idea of organizations as
    open systems. He was a biologist.

40
Organizations as Open Systems - Joan Woodward
  • Researched the impact of technology on
    organizational structure.
  • Classified organizations by the complexity of the
    technology used.

Joan Woodward
41
Joan Woodward
42
Organizations as Open Systems
  • The Aston Group also considered technology but
    arrived at different findings than Woodward.
  • Paul Lawrence and Jay Lorsch's viewed the impact
    of environmental factors on structure
  • Rate of change in environmental conditions
  • Certainty of information available
  • Time span of feedback of results from decisions.

43
Behavioral Theories of the Firm
  • Emphasis on internal processes of coalitions,
    organizational learning, conflict resolution, and
    so forth was a new approach. Representatives of
    this approach are Richard Cyert James March,
    Daniel Katz Robert Kahn, and Karl Weick.
  • Another emphasis was on external forces and
    factors as primary shapers of the organization.
    Jeffrey Pfeffer Gerald Salancik, Michael Hannan
    John Freeman, and John Meyer Richard Scott
    are cited as representatives.

44
The Paradigm Wars
  • Paradigm, a model, example, or pattern to help
    us view organizations.
  • Disagreements about the number of contemporary
    paradigms exist some indicating this as a sign
    of progress and others seeing this as creating an
    organization theory jungle.
  • Miners analysis of 73 theories is important as
    he indicates no organization theory high in
    estimated scientific validity or usefulness in
    application.

45
Strategy and Structure
  • Chandlers study led to the idea that structure
    follows strategy.
  • Fayol saw the need for a fit between structure
    and the objectives, resources, and requirements
    of the firm.
  • In the 1960s and 1970s, economic and political
    factors influenced many mergers and acquisitions
    as firms diversified outside of their industry.

46
Summary
  • The influx of behavioral scientists into business
    schools brought different perspectives, research
    tools, and ideas.
  • Their impact was felt on organization design and
    job design.
  • Personnel management evolved into human resource
    management.
  • Organizational theory evolved from a number of
    factors, internal and external.
  • Better theory, it was suggested, can be built by
    examining successful practice.

47
Internet Resources
  • Academy of Management Management History
    Division Websitehttp//www.aomhistory.baker.edu/d
    epartments/leadership/mgthistory/links.html
  • List of Internet Resources compiled by Charles
    Booth http//www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/MANAGEMENT-H
    ISTORY/links.htm
  • Western Libraries Business Library Biographies
    of Gurus
  • http//www.lib.uwo.ca/business/gurus.html
  • Henry Mintzberg
  • http//www.henrymintzberg.com/
  • Thought Leaders Forum Mintzberg
  • http//www.pfdf.org/leaderbooks/mintzberg/
  • Rensis Likert http//www.accel-team.com/human_rel
    ations/hrels_04_likert.html
  • David C. McClelland http//www.accel-team.com/hum
    an_relations/hrels_06_mcclelland.html
  • Peter Drucker Interview http//www.cio.com/archiv
    e/091597_interview_content.html

48
Internet Resources
  • Drucker - Leader to Leader Institute
    http//www.leadertoleader.org/
  • Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901--1972)
  • http//www.isss.org/lumLVB.htm
  • Chris Argyris http//www.accel-team.com/motivatio
    n/chris_argyris_00.html
  • Douglas McGregor http//www.accel-team.com/human_
    relations/hrels_03_mcgregor.html
  • Frederick Herzberg
  • http//www.accel-team.com/human_relations/hrels_05
    _herzberg.html
  • Victor Vroom http//www.som.yale.edu/Faculty/vhv1
    /
  • Edwin A. Locke http//www.edwinlocke.com/
    http//www.rhsmith.umd.edu/mao/faculty/elocke/
  • Fred Fiedler http//www.thoemmes.com/dictionaries
    /bdm_fiedler.htm
  • Joan Woodward http//www.lib.uwo.ca/business/WOOD
    WARD.html

49
Internet Resources
  • Joan Woodward http//www.lib.uwo.ca/business/WOOD
    WARD.html
  • P.M.S. Blackett http//www.nobel.se/physics/laure
    ates/1948/blackett-bio.html
  • Deming Institute
  • http//www.deming.org/
  • Ludwig von Bertalanffy http//www.isss.org/lumLVB
    .htm
  • Norbert Wiener http//www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk
    /history/Mathematicians/Wiener_Norbert.html
  • What are Cybernetics? http//pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CY
    BSWHAT.html
  • Death of the Slide Rule http//www.xnumber.com/xn
    umber/hp.htm
  • John Vincent Atanasoff http//www.cs.iastate.edu/
    jva/jva-archive.shtml
  • David Ricardo http//socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/
    econ/ugcm/3ll3/ricardo/

50
Internet Resources
  • Geert Hofstede
  • http//spitswww.uvt.nl/web/iric/hofstede/
  • Managing Oneself by Peter F. Drucker
    http//www.pfdf.org/conferences/drucker99.html
  • Ansoff Matrix http//www.quickmba.com/strategy/ma
    trix/ansoff/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com