Environmental Cost Accounting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Cost Accounting

Description:

Safe workplace. Safe handling of. materials. Waste reduction. Pollution control. Product ... part of a company's operating, investing and financing activities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:511
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Roland3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Cost Accounting


1
Environmental Cost Accounting and Green Supply
Chain Management
2
Basic types of costs
  • Direct and indirect costs (direct costs can be
    traced directly to cost objects)
  • Variable and fixed costs (variable costs are
    functions of output or variable cost can be
    changed in the short run)
  • Internal and external costs (internal costs
    are costs incurred by the studied agency)
  • ? Indirect costs need to be allocated through
    cost accounting systems
  • ? Fixed costs are not impacted by short-term
    decisions
  • ? External costs do not impact the studied agency

Note Costs are measured in monetary units,
10 kWh is not an energy cost,
10kg of CO2 is not an environmental cost
3
Life cycle costing
  • Internal life cycle costingof materials
  • Purchasing
  • Handling
  • Storage
  • Recovery
  • Disposal
  • Take-back
  • Life cycle costing of products
  • Materials production
  • Component manufacturing
  • Product assembly
  • Product use
  • Product end-of-life management
  • Logistics between all above processes

4
Definition and Types of Environmental Costs
  • Definition of Environmental Cost
  • Expenditures that arise from either compulsory or
    voluntary activities to achieve environmental
    objectives (does not include external cost).
  • Environmental cost can thus be divided
    intoregulatory (or compliance) cost and
    voluntary cost.
  • There are four types of environmental activities
  • Prevention activities
  • are undertaken to eliminate potential causes
    of adverse environmental impacts. Examples
    Product and process redesign, using clean
    technologies
  • Assessment activities measure and monitor
    potential sources of environmental damage.
    Examples Measure emission levels, contamination
    build-up, environmental audits
  • Control activities are designed to control
    and contain source of environmental impact.
    Examples End-of-pipe technology like scrubbers,
    waste water treatment, etc.
  • Failure activities
  • are undertaken to remediate accidental
    environmental damage Examples Industrial site
    clean-up, dealing with oils spills, leaks, etc.

5
Accounting for Environmental Costs
  • EnvironmentallyRelated Activities
  • Safe workplace
  • Safe handling of materials
  • Waste reduction
  • Pollution control
  • Product take-back
  • Site cleanup
  • Emission permits
  • public relations
  • Etc.

Regulatory Reasons (Laws)
  • Purpose of
  • Activity
  • Prevention
  • Assessment
  • Control
  • Failure

Costsof Activity
Voluntary Reasons (Society, Culture,Customers)
6
Magnitude and Sources of Environmental Costs
  • In the S.C. Johnson case environmental cost
    exceeded operating profit for the product.
  • In the Dow case the use of a seemingly
    inexpensive solvent created environmental
    problems that jeopardized an entire product line.

Source WRI 1995
7
Direct and Indirect Environmental Costs
Direct versus indirect environmental costs
  • Direct costs are directly attributable to
    environmental activities that are part of a
    companys operating, investing and financing
    activities (Example waste disposal fees,
    emission permits, pollution control equipment)
  • Indirect costs are not directly attributable to
    environmental activities that are part of a
    companys operating, investing and financing
    activities (Example Overhead costs, corporate
    image and public relationship costs)
  • All identified environmental cost, fixed or
    variable, direct or indirect, should be allocated
  • to the activities that generate the
    environmental costs (cost center)
  • and to the ultimate causes of the activities
    (cost driver).

8
Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
Waste 50kg
Waste 50kg
Incinerator
Waste 100kg
Cost allocation basis Amount of waste
incinerated
Total cost of incineration 800
9
Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of material
processed
Overhead
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
850kg
900kg
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
50kg
50kg
100kg
10
Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processed
material that will become waste
Overhead
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
850kg
800kg
900kg
1000kg
Input
Product output
50kg
50kg
100kg
11
Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processed
material that will become waste
Overhead
654.5 327.3
163.6
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
Waste 50kg
Waste 50kg
Incinerator
Waste 100kg
Allocation key Amount of waste incinerated
Total cost of incineration 800
12
Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processing that
waste has gone through
Overhead
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
850kg
800kg
900kg
1000kg
Input
Product output
50kg
50kg
100kg
13
Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processing that
waste has gone through
Overhead
327.3 327.3
490.9
Costdriver
Costcenter 1 7.3/kg
Costcenter 2 10.5/kg
Costcenter 3 13.8/kg
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
Waste 50kg
Waste 50kg
Incinerator
Waste 100kg
Allocation key Amount of waste incinerated
Total cost of incineration 800
14
Consequential assessment of environment-driven
indirect cost
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
input 20/ton
Output 560/ton
1250
640
800
1000
200
160
250
Disposal 20/ton of waste
Plant
15
Consequential assessment of environment-driven
indirect cost
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
input 20/ton
Output 560/ton
1250
640
800
1000
200
160
250
Disposal 20/ton of waste
Plant Performance
Total revenue 358,400 Input cost
25,000 Process cost 305,000 Disposal cost
12,200 Total operating cost 342,200 Operating
income 16,200 Profit margin 16,200 /
358,400 4.52
1250 tons x 20 3050 tons x 100 610 tons x 20
Disposal cost is 3.57 of operating cost and 3.4
of net sales.
16
Consequential assessment of environment-driven
indirect cost
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
input 20/ton
Output 560/ton
1250
640
800
1000
200
160
250
Disposal 20/ton of waste
All three process managers suggest pollution
prevention measures to the plantmanager that
would each create a zero-waste process and each
cost 4,000. What should the plant manager
decide?
17
Reading for Monday, May 4 Corbett C J, Klassen
R D (2006) Extending the Horizons Environmental
Excellence as Key to Improving Operations, MSOM
8(1) Winter 2006, pp. 5-22 Posted on course
website as Corbett Klassen 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com