Title: Environmental Cost Accounting
1Environmental Cost Accounting and Green Supply
Chain Management
2Basic types of costs
- Direct and indirect costs (direct costs can be
traced directly to cost objects) - Variable and fixed costs (variable costs are
functions of output or variable cost can be
changed in the short run) - Internal and external costs (internal costs
are costs incurred by the studied agency) - ? Indirect costs need to be allocated through
cost accounting systems - ? Fixed costs are not impacted by short-term
decisions - ? External costs do not impact the studied agency
Note Costs are measured in monetary units,
10 kWh is not an energy cost,
10kg of CO2 is not an environmental cost
3Life cycle costing
- Internal life cycle costingof materials
- Purchasing
- Handling
- Storage
- Recovery
- Disposal
- Take-back
- Life cycle costing of products
- Materials production
- Component manufacturing
- Product assembly
- Product use
- Product end-of-life management
- Logistics between all above processes
4Definition and Types of Environmental Costs
- Definition of Environmental Cost
- Expenditures that arise from either compulsory or
voluntary activities to achieve environmental
objectives (does not include external cost). - Environmental cost can thus be divided
intoregulatory (or compliance) cost and
voluntary cost. - There are four types of environmental activities
- Prevention activities
- are undertaken to eliminate potential causes
of adverse environmental impacts. Examples
Product and process redesign, using clean
technologies - Assessment activities measure and monitor
potential sources of environmental damage.
Examples Measure emission levels, contamination
build-up, environmental audits - Control activities are designed to control
and contain source of environmental impact.
Examples End-of-pipe technology like scrubbers,
waste water treatment, etc. - Failure activities
- are undertaken to remediate accidental
environmental damage Examples Industrial site
clean-up, dealing with oils spills, leaks, etc.
5Accounting for Environmental Costs
- EnvironmentallyRelated Activities
- Safe workplace
- Safe handling of materials
- Waste reduction
- Pollution control
- Product take-back
- Site cleanup
- Emission permits
- public relations
- Etc.
Regulatory Reasons (Laws)
- Purpose of
- Activity
- Prevention
- Assessment
- Control
- Failure
Costsof Activity
Voluntary Reasons (Society, Culture,Customers)
6Magnitude and Sources of Environmental Costs
- In the S.C. Johnson case environmental cost
exceeded operating profit for the product. - In the Dow case the use of a seemingly
inexpensive solvent created environmental
problems that jeopardized an entire product line.
Source WRI 1995
7Direct and Indirect Environmental Costs
Direct versus indirect environmental costs
- Direct costs are directly attributable to
environmental activities that are part of a
companys operating, investing and financing
activities (Example waste disposal fees,
emission permits, pollution control equipment) - Indirect costs are not directly attributable to
environmental activities that are part of a
companys operating, investing and financing
activities (Example Overhead costs, corporate
image and public relationship costs)
- All identified environmental cost, fixed or
variable, direct or indirect, should be allocated - to the activities that generate the
environmental costs (cost center) - and to the ultimate causes of the activities
(cost driver).
8Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
Waste 50kg
Waste 50kg
Incinerator
Waste 100kg
Cost allocation basis Amount of waste
incinerated
Total cost of incineration 800
9Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of material
processed
Overhead
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
850kg
900kg
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
50kg
50kg
100kg
10Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processed
material that will become waste
Overhead
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
850kg
800kg
900kg
1000kg
Input
Product output
50kg
50kg
100kg
11Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processed
material that will become waste
Overhead
654.5 327.3
163.6
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
Waste 50kg
Waste 50kg
Incinerator
Waste 100kg
Allocation key Amount of waste incinerated
Total cost of incineration 800
12Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processing that
waste has gone through
Overhead
Costdriver
Costcenter 1
Costcenter 2
Costcenter 3
850kg
800kg
900kg
1000kg
Input
Product output
50kg
50kg
100kg
13Allocation of environment-driven indirect cost
Total cost of overhead 9,000
Cost allocation basis Amount of processing that
waste has gone through
Overhead
327.3 327.3
490.9
Costdriver
Costcenter 1 7.3/kg
Costcenter 2 10.5/kg
Costcenter 3 13.8/kg
Product output 800kg
Input 1,000kg
Waste 50kg
Waste 50kg
Incinerator
Waste 100kg
Allocation key Amount of waste incinerated
Total cost of incineration 800
14Consequential assessment of environment-driven
indirect cost
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
input 20/ton
Output 560/ton
1250
640
800
1000
200
160
250
Disposal 20/ton of waste
Plant
15Consequential assessment of environment-driven
indirect cost
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
input 20/ton
Output 560/ton
1250
640
800
1000
200
160
250
Disposal 20/ton of waste
Plant Performance
Total revenue 358,400 Input cost
25,000 Process cost 305,000 Disposal cost
12,200 Total operating cost 342,200 Operating
income 16,200 Profit margin 16,200 /
358,400 4.52
1250 tons x 20 3050 tons x 100 610 tons x 20
Disposal cost is 3.57 of operating cost and 3.4
of net sales.
16Consequential assessment of environment-driven
indirect cost
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
yield 80 100/ton of input
input 20/ton
Output 560/ton
1250
640
800
1000
200
160
250
Disposal 20/ton of waste
All three process managers suggest pollution
prevention measures to the plantmanager that
would each create a zero-waste process and each
cost 4,000. What should the plant manager
decide?
17Reading for Monday, May 4 Corbett C J, Klassen
R D (2006) Extending the Horizons Environmental
Excellence as Key to Improving Operations, MSOM
8(1) Winter 2006, pp. 5-22 Posted on course
website as Corbett Klassen 2006