Presentacin de PowerPoint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

Presentacin de PowerPoint

Description:

Presentacin de PowerPoint – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: equ555
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentacin de PowerPoint


1
MADRID 11-M
The Impact on Hospitals from a Terrorist
Event Lessons from the Madrid Train Bombing
Dr. Javier Ortiz
2
11 March Bombing Overview
On March 11th between 0739 and 0742 local time,
10 explosive devices were detonated in 4 commuter
trains along the train line, which runs from
Guadalajara to the Atocha, train Station in
Madrid.
3
11 March Bombing Overview
  • Estimates are that
  • Up to 700 people were on each of the trains.
  • An average of 100 people were in each of the
    passenger cars.

4
CASUALTIES
  • 2062 Casualties
  • 199 Deaths
  • ? 177 Immediate
  • ? 14 In-Hospital
  • 83 Critical

5
RESOURCES MOBILIZED
  • Thousands of Health personnel
  • Over 300 Ambulances
  • 650 Firemen
  • 14,188 Calls to the Emergency phone 112
  • 948 Psicologists
  • 95 Forensic Surgeons
  • 4,600 Blood donations in Madrid and over 2,500
    from the rest of the country
  • Economic Cost gt 26.540.544

6
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

7
MADRID EMS
  • Phone 112
  • SUMMA 112
  • SAMUR

8
MADRID EMS
  • SUMMA 112
  • 061 Home emergencies
  • SERCAM Suburbs

9
MADRID EMS
SAMUR Urban emergencies
10
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

11
Time and Location of Blasts
12
10 Bombs in 4 Trains
13
SAMUR FIELD HOSPITAL
FIELD HOSPITAL
Over 250 patients attended
14
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
1 - ATOCHA STATION
15
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
2 TELLEZ ST.
16
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
3 EL POZO STATION
17
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
4 SANTA EUGENIA STATION
18
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
HUMAN RESOURCES
Number
19
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
VEHICLES
Number
20
SAMUR-SUMMA INTERVENTION
VICTIMS ATTENDED IN THE FIELD AS CLASSIFIED BY
SAMUR
252
Number
21
VICTIMS
2,062 injured
22
BLASTS AND HOSPITAL LOCATIONS
Ramón y Cajal
MORGUE
58
La Paz
P. Asturias
Clínico
La Princesa
G. Marañón
Field Hospital
12 Octubre
23
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

24
MADRID SANITARY MAP
Census(2001) 5,423,384
25
SANITARY AREAS OF MADRID
Madrid 2001 Census 5,423,384
Hospital G. Marañón
Population 674,417
26
HOSPITAL GREGORIO MARAÑÓN
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
27
HOSPITAL GREGORIO MARAÑÓN
HUMAN RESOURCES
28
HOSPITAL GREGORIO MARAÑÓN
HOSPITAL ACTIVITY (2003)
29
HOSPITAL GREGORIO MARAÑÓN
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
30
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

31
HOSPITAL GREGORIO MARAÑÓN
NOTIFICATION OF THE DISASTER TO THE HOSPITAL
  • 745 am Radio, TV.
  • 756 am first 2 walking wounded victims
    entered the ED.
  • 800 oficial communication The ED is informed of
    the inminent arrival of victims

32
ACTIVATION OF THE DISASTER PLAN
33
DISASTER PLAN Assessment of the Hospital Capacity
  • Beds
  • Operating rooms
  • ICU capacity
  • Personnel
  • Supplies

34
DISASTER PLAN OPERATING ROOMS (OR)
810 830 AM
  • 66 Elective Surgeries were Cancelled
  • 22 OR ready for emergency surgery

35
DISASTER PLAN ICU CAPACITY
810 830 AM
  • 36 Medical ? Surgical ICU Beds
  • Most of the ICU patients were transferred to more
    intermediate care

36
DISASTER PLAN HOSPITAL BEDS
830 1030 AM
  • Discharge patients from the hospital
  • 347 Medical and Surgical beds available for
    victims in the first 2 hr

37
DISASTER PLAN ED SITUATION AND ACTIONS
800 am 123 patients remained under observation
in the ED
915 am 30 Admitted 83 Discharged 10 Remained
in the ED
38
DISASTER PLAN PERSONNEL
  • 800 am Most on duty. Way to work
  • Night shifts remained on duty
  • Spontaneous
  • collaboration from ALL
  • More than needed
  • in the ED

39
DISASTER PLAN SUPPLIES
  • Wheelchairs, stretchers to receiving area
  • Essential equipment
  • I.V. lines
  • Medications
  • Blood bank

40
DISASTER PLAN MEDIA RELATIONS AND FAMILY
900 am
Teaching Pavillion
41
DISASTER COMMAND DECISIONS
Specific data base system of casualties. Available
to other hospitals and local health authorities
at 1100h.
42
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

43
ED TRIAGE ? TREATMENT AREAS
44
ED TRIAGE
Trauma care in the new millenium. Surg Clin
Noth Am 61541-1558, 1999
45
ED TRIAGE
SENIOR SURGEON SENIOR ICU
46
ED TRIAGE ? TREATMENT AREAS
ED RESUCITATION ROOM CAPACITY
47
ED Medical and Surgical Observation
  • Emergency medicine physician
  • Resident in medical or surgical specialty
  • Nursing

48
HGUGM Distribution of Casualties
312 victims treated in the Hospital
49
Nº OF SURVIVORS ADMITTED TO THE ED BY TIME OF
THE DAY
100
N 325
80
60
Number of Survivors
40
20
0
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
2000
740
Time of Day
Data included only survivors attended at the GM
Hospital
50
ER Visits Comparison First 2-Hr (800 - 1000 AM)
51
CUMULATIVE OF SURVIVORS ADMITTED TO THE ED BY
TIME OF THE DAY
100
N 325
80
60
Percent of Survivors
40
20
0
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
2000
740
Time of Day
Data included only survivors attended at the GM
Hospital
52
Nº OF SURVIVORS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL BY TIME
OF THE DAY
100
N 119
80
60
Number of Survivors
40
20
0
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
2000
740
Time of Day
Data included only survivors attended at the GM
Hospital
53
CUMULATIVE OF SURVIVORS ADMITTED TO THE
HOSPITAL BY TIME OF THE DAY
100
N 119
80
60
Number of Survivors
40
20
0
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
2000
Time of the Day
740
Data included only survivors attended at the GM
Hospital
54
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

55
HGUGM CASUALTIES AGE GENDER
Mean age 32 yr.
56
HGUGM CASUALTIES MOST FREQUENT LESIONS (N243)
57
HGUGM CASUALTIES SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS DAY1
58
CRITICAL MORTALITY RATE
59
RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES IN THE ED
60
BLOOD BANK
61
SEVERITY CLINICAL MANAGEMENT
Frykberg E.R. J Trauma 200253201-212.
62
MORTALITY CRITICAL PATIENTS
63
OVERTRIAGE
  • Proportion of survivors assigned to immediate
    care, hospitalization, or evacuation who are not
    critically injured.
  • Rate of 50 is necessary to reduce
    life-threatening undertriage to zero.
  • In mass casualty disaster overtriage could be
    also life-threatening

Frykberg E.R. J Trauma 200253201-212.
64
Relation of Overtriage to Critical Mortality
Frykberg E.R. J Trauma 200253201-212
65
PSYCHOLOGIC CARE
66
INDEX
  • Health System EMS
  • Field Management of Disaster Victims
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
  • Activation of the Hospital Disaster Plan
  • ED Triage, treatment areas, flow of patients
  • Patterns of Injury, Severity, and Mortality
  • Conclusions and Lessons Learned

67
KEYS IN THE RESPONSE OF THE EMS
  • Decisive effect of the training process
    (simulation).
  • Rapid response (except for 1 focus) and
    evacuation.
  • Triage by trained physicians
  • Acceptable management of critical patients.
  • Excellent collaboration of all the personnel.

68
KEYS IN THE RESPONSE OF THE GM HOSPITAL
  • Decisive effect of the time of the blast (740).
  • Experience of the medical STAFF in the management
    of politrauma.
  • Spontaneous collaboration of all the personnel.

69
HOSPITAL CAPACITY TO RESPOND TO A DISASTER
3 4 PATIENTES PER HOUR PER 100 BEDS
Costich JF, Scutchfield FD. Public health
preparedness and response capacity inventory
validity study J Public Health Manag Pract
200410225-33.
70
WEAKNESS
  • Initial chaos due to
  • ? 4 different focus. Not managed as 1 focus
  • ? Delay in notification of 1 focus
  • ? Overtriage of patients to hospitals.
  • ? Unequal distribution of victims between
    hospitals

71
WEAKNESS
  • Poor communication with disaster site.
  • Deficiencies in the security, identification of
    patients and record keeping.
  • Initially, severe problems handling family
    members looking for their love ones.

72
FINAL CONCLUSIONS FROM THE HGUGM EXPERIENCE
  • Terrorist activity continues to threaten the
    civilian community
  • New chalenge of a mass casualty event with 4
    different focus.
  • A dissater plan must incorporate both
    pre-hospital and hospitals values

73
FINAL CONCLUSIONS FROM THE HGUGM EXPERIENCE
  • Disaster plan must be based on published
    experience.
  • These plans should be rehearsed periodically.
  • Surgeons must become more involved in the
    planning process.
  • Include training in mass casualty events in the
    curriculum

74
(No Transcript)
75
Madrid, 12-M 2004.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com