Title: 11K Audit Live Forum
111-K Audit Live Forum
March 23, 2006
2Welcome to the 2006 11-K Audit Live Forum
Val Bitton Deloitte Touche, LLP
3Todays Presenters
- Val Bitton, CPA
- Partner
- Deloitte Touche LLP
- Bill LeRoy,
- Partner
- BDO Seidman, LLP
- Michele Weldon, CPA
- Partner
- Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, LLP
- Mike Fitzpatrick, CPA
- Partner
- Ernst Young, LLP
4Program Format
- Speakers will provide a brief discussion of each
topic - Participants may submit questions at any time via
email through the Center mailbox at
ebpaqc_at_aicpa.org - Questions will be answered at the end of the
program
5Program Objectives
- This program is designed to
- Identify practice issues related to audits of
plans that file on Form 11-K with the SEC - Provide you with the opportunity to hear and
discuss best practices related to 11-K audits - Allow you to ask questions regarding your firms
11-K audit practice
6Mike FitzpatrickErnst Young, LLP
Reporting
7Overview of SEC Rules and Regulations
- Form S-8 Requirements
- Form 11-K Requirements
- Form 8-K Requirements
- Exemptions
- Consents
- Reference to PCAOB Standards
- Blackout Periods
8Form S-8 Requirements
- To Register employer stock to be issued pursuant
to an employee benefit plan - To Register participants interest in a plan if
- Plan is both voluntary and contributory and
- Not managed by an insurance company (separate
account) or a bank (common trust fund) or - A single-employer plan in which employee
contributions are invested in employer securities
9When is Form 11-K Required?
- For Annual Reports of Employee Stock Purchase,
Savings and similar plans, interest in which
constitutes securities registered under
Securities Act of 1933 - Existing plan which is adding employer securities
- New Plan which includes employer securities
- Resources
- AICPA Audit Risk Alert
- AICPA EBP Audit Guide Chapter 12
10Filing Requirements
- Due Dates
- 90 days after the end of the fiscal year of the
Plan - Plans subject to ERISA within 180 days after the
end of the fiscal year of the Plan - Late filingsExtension requirements
- Effect on Registrant
- 12b-25 Extension request for 15 calendar days
11Financial Statements and Schedules
- SEC-Format Section 15(d)
- Article 6A of Regulation S-X
- ERISA Format
- Full Scope Audit required
- Limited Scope is not acceptable
- Prior year limited scope audit-
- Upgrade of prior year audit required
- Modified cash basis of accounting is acceptable
12Exemptions
- From Audited Financial Statements
- Less than 100 participants and filing in
accordance with ERISA - Unaudited financial statements would be included
in the filing - Beware of stock-bonus plans which are not ERISA
plans
13Consent of Independent Auditors
- Requirement that auditors consent to the use of
their report in a 1933 Act registration
statement - Should be dated as close to the filing date as
possible but not earlier than 3-5 days - Consents are addressed only to the client
14Consents
- Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm - The Plan Administrator of the
- XYZ, Inc. 401 (k) Plan
- We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement (No. 333-000606) on
Form S-8 of XYZ, Inc. of our report dated May 24,
200X, with respect to the statements of net
assets available for benefits of XYZ, Inc. 401
(k) Plan as of December 31, 200X, and 200Y, the
related statements of changes in net assets
available for benefits for the years then ended,
and the related supplemental schedules as of
December 31, 200X, which report appears in the
December 31, 200X annual report on Form 11-K of
XYZ, Inc. 401(k) Plan. - City, State
- Date
15Unique Circumstances
- Change in Auditors
- Two consents are needed
- Impact on opinions
- Additional audit procedures required
16Form 8-K Requirements
- Change in auditors
- If required, due in 4 business days
- May require two Form 8-Ks
- Dismissal of current auditor and appointment of
new auditors - Should have client obtain SEC legal advise
- Letter responding to statements made in Form 8-K,
if filed - Separate letter requirement if no Form 8-K filed
- Form 5500 Schedule C requires reporting of
changes in auditors and actuaries and reason for
the change.
17Letter from Predecessor Auditor
- Mr. John Doe
- Chief Financial Officer
- XYZ Corporation
- Anytown, USA
- Dear Mr. Doe
- This is to confirm that the client-auditor
relationship - between XYZ Corporation (Commission File
- Number x-xxxx) and Audit Firm has ceased.
-
- Very truly yours,
- /s/ Audit Firm
- cc Office of the Chief Accountant
18PCAOB Standard No. 1 References to PCAOB Standards
- Title of audit report
- Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm - Must refer to standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and no
longer can refer to GAAS. - SEC will reject filings if GAAS is referred to
- DOL Regulations require reference to GAAS
- DOL will accept dual references
- Could reject filings if the only reference is to
PCAOB standards
19Example Wording 11-K Filing with the SEC
- We conducted our audits in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform. . . . . - Reports filed with the DOL should refer to GAAS
20AICPA Audit Interpretations
- Interpretation No. 17 of SAS No. 58
Clarification in the Audit Report of the Extent
of Testing of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting in Accordance with Generally Accepted
Auditing Standards (Issued June 2004) Following
only AICPA standardsnot adopted or approved by
the PCAOB - Does not affect Limited Scope opinions
21Example Wording for a Full Scope Audit Filed with
the DOL
- We conducted our audits in accordance with
standards generally accepted in the United States
of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing
audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Plans internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, . . . .
22Audit Interpretations
- Interpretation No. 18 of SAS No. 58 Reference to
PCAOB Standards in an Audit Report of a Non-
Issuer - Audit conducted under both standards
- Dual Reporting for both PCAOB standards and GAAS
as well as a disclaimer on internal control. - Does not apply to Plans that file 11-Ks as these
plans are considered issuers
23Example Wording for Non-Issuer
- We conducted our audit in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards as
established by the Auditing Standards Board
(United States) and in accordance with the
auditing standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. The Plan is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit
of its internal control over financial reporting.
Our audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Plans internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes . .. .. .
24Blackout Periods
- Section 306-Insider Trades During Pension Fund
Blackout Periods - Executives can not exercise and cash out their
employee stock options and sell other issuer
securities acquired through the companys equity
compensation plans during a pension fund blackout
period - Corporate issue but plan auditors should be aware
of rules
25DOL Blackout Regulations
- DOL has additional regulations related to
blackout periods with penalties for the Plan
Sponsor - 401(k) Plans must provide 30 day advance notice
to participants - Reason for blackout
- Start and end dates
- Description of rights being suspended
- Statement advising participants to evaluate their
investments with this in mind - Penalties of 100/day per participant
- DOL has been reviewing and assessing penalties
26Bill LeRoyBDO Seidman, LLP
Auditor Independence
27Auditor Independence Issues
- Independence Rules and Partner Rotation Rules
- SEC Prohibited Services
28Independence and Partner Rotation Rules
- Independence Rules
- Plan and Plan Sponsor
- - SEC
- - Department of Labor
- During performance of audit
- And for the period covered by the financial
statements - Potential problem in accepting new engagements
- DOL Considering Revising Independence Rules
- Partner Rotation Rules
- Five Years for Engagement Concurring
- Five Year Cooling Off Period
29SEC Prohibited Services
- To Plan
- Bookkeeping
- Preparation of Financial Statements
- If Client not Qualified-Another CPA Firm
- To Plan Sponsor
- Services to Plan Sponsor OK (if not auditing the
Plan Sponsor) as long as it does not involve the
Plan) - e.g.- 404 work OK but not with payroll
30Michele WeldonPricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Other Audit Considerations
31Other Audit Considerations
- Engagement Letters
- Representation Letters
- Impact of 404 on Plan Audits
- Required Communications
- Investments
32Engagement Letters
- Special considerations for 11-Ks
- Addressee
- Reference PCAOB and GAAS standards
- Confirm pre-approval requirements met
- Auditor responsibility to communicate with plan
oversight entity - EDGAR
- Release and indemnification
- Other plans for public company sponsors
33Representation Letters
- Special Considerations for 11-Ks
- Single letter for both opinions
- Update for consent date, if later
- Update for GAAS opinion release date
- Representation re significant deficiencies in
internal controls - Signatories
34Impact of 404 on Plan Audits
- Plans that file Form 11-K are not required to
comply with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 - For all EBP audits integrated audit and 404
reporting requirements increased focus on SAS 70s - More service providers issuing Type II SAS 70s,
particularly payroll service providers - Change in year-end, away from 12/31
- Exceptions, carve-outs, qualifications more
common - For public company sponsors plan oversight,
payroll and plan operations potentially within
404 scope - Documentation, testing and evaluation of systems
relevant to plan audit - Consider impact on audit strategy ? may be more
opportunities for controls reliance approach
35Required Communications
- Authoritative Guidance
- SEC Regulation S-X Rule 2-07
- SAS 61 AU 380
- AS 2
36To Whom Should Auditor Report?
- Party responsible for plan oversight equivalent
to an audit committee - Plan oversight entity (preferred)
- In absence of oversight entity, alternatives
- Plan Sponsor Audit Committee
- Plan Administrator
37What Should be Communicated?
- SAS 61/AU 380 communications
- Additional requirements
- Auditors responsibility under GAAS and PCAOB
standards - Critical accounting policies and alternative
treatments within GAAP - Independence
- Fees
- Material written communications
38When Should Communications Be Made?
- Prior to issuance of financial statements
- Material weaknesses and significant deficiencies,
in the design or operation of the accounting and
internal control systems to - Management
- Designated oversight body
- Prior to filing form 11-K
- Additional required communications
- SAS 61 communications generally combined in same
document - Dated the same date as opinion or consent
- Oral communications allowed if documented
- Date of communication
- Individuals involved
- Items discussed
3911-K Investment Considerations
- Proper categorization of pooled investment
vehicles - Mutual funds, common/collective trust funds, or
insurance company pooled separate accounts - Unitized Accounting
- Recordkeeping convention, not an investment
entity - Generally adds liquidity to long-term investment
to facilitate daily participant transactions - Gives look and feel of mutual fund to a pool of
investments owned directly by the plan - Company common stock funds, separate accounts,
GICs - Synthetic GICs fund owns underlying investments
wrapper contracts
40Audit Documentation
Val Bitton Deloitte Touche, LLP
41Audit Documentation
- Required Audit Documentation under PCAOB Standard
No. 3 - Nature and Extent of Documentation Required
- Significant Documentation Matter
- Definition Significant Findings or Issues
- Completing and Retaining
42Documentation Requirements of PCAOB Auditing
Standard No. 3
- Prepare documentation in sufficient detail to
provide a clear understanding of its purpose,
source, and the conclusions reached - Examples of audit documentation include memos,
confirmations, correspondence, audit programs,
rep letters - Audit documentation may be in the form of paper,
electronic files or other media - Organize documentation to provide a clear link
to the significant findings or issues (discussed
in more detail later) - Auditor must document procedures performed,
evidence obtained, and audit conclusions reached
on relevant financial statement assertions
43Nature and Extent of Documentation Required
- Audit documentation must contain sufficient
information for an experienced auditor to - Understand the procedures performed, evidence
obtained, and conclusions reached - Determine who performed the work (and the date
the work was performed), and who reviewed the
work (and the date of review)
44Nature and Extent of Documentation Required
- Auditor MUST HAVE written documentation oral
evidence alone does not constitute sufficient
evidence that the procedures were performed - Demonstrate that the underlying accounting
records agree/reconcile with the financial
statements - Make reference to the items documented in a
central repository (independence, training, etc.)
45Nature and Extent of Documentation Required
- Audit Implications
- Requires clear and comprehensive documentation
- Signed-off program steps generally will not be
sufficient documentation - Applies to the auditor and specialists
- Requires coordination between audit and tax
engagement team members
46Significant Documentation Matter
- Defined
- Possible restatement for correction of an error
affecting revenue, net income, or net worth - Identification of possible fraud or illegal acts
- Disagreements or differences in professional
judgment - Subsequent discovery of facts (i.e., subsequent
to issuance of our report) existing at the date
of our report that might have affected such
report - Significant expansion from originally planned
audit scope - Whistle-blower letters relating to the
financial statements, financial accounting, or
other matters covered by our audit opinion - Documentation Requirements
- Keep everything
47Definition Significant Findings or Issues
- Significant Findings or Issues
- Selection, application, and consistency in
accounting principles, including related
disclosures - Accounting for complex or unusual transactions
- Significant accounting estimates and
uncertainties, including related management
assumptions - Significant modification of planned auditing
procedures - Material misstatements or omissions in the
financial statements - Significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
- Audit adjustments that are material, either
individually or in the aggregate (whether or not
recorded by management)
48Definition Significant Findings or Issues
(contd)
- Significant Findings or Issues
- Disagreements among members of the engagement
team or others consulted on the engagement about
final conclusions reached on significant
accounting or auditing matters - Circumstances that cause significant difficulty
in applying the auditing procedures that we
considered necessary - Significant changes in the assessed level of
audit risk for particular audit areas and our
response to those changes - Any matters that could result in a modification
to our report
49Definition Significant Findings or Issues
(contd)
- Documentation Requirements
- Document significant findings or issues, actions
taken to address them, and the basis for
conclusions reached - Include information that is inconsistent with or
contradicts the final conclusion and resolution
of such information - Needs to be documented in the Summary Memorandum
- Audit Implications
- Need to capture and thoroughly document this
broad category of issues
50Completing and Retaining
- Complete all auditing procedures and obtain
sufficient evidence prior to issuing the report - For any information changed after report
issuance, document the date of the change, who
made the change, and the reasons for the change - Do not delete or discard any items after
archiving - Complete and archive the final set of
documentation within 45 days of issuing the
report - Retain for seven years from
- Report issuance date (completed engagements)
- Engagement cessation (terminated engagements)
51What Happens When the 5500 Is Filed More than 45
Days After the Report Date?
- Audit documentation must not be deleted or
discarded after the completion date however
information may be added - Added documentation (in this case the 5500 and
the review thereof) must indicate the date the
information was added, the name of the person who
prepared the additional documentation and the
reason for adding it
52Questions?ebpaqc_at_aicpa.org
53Wrap Up
- Thanks for joining us today for the 11-K Live
Forum - We welcome any additional feedback on todays
live forum. Send comments to the Center mailbox
at ebpaqc_at_aicpa.org. - Visit the Center Online Forum to interact with
other members on 11-K and other issues. - Remember to register for the upcoming free 2006
Live Forum for in-charges to be held on April 26
from 300-500pm Eastern Time - AICPA EBP Conference May 8-10 in Baltimore,
Maryland - Watch for details of AICPA EBP webcasts Form
5500 Q A and Audit Risk Alert
54Thank You For Participating!