Title: Capital Structure: Basic Concepts
1Capital Structure Basic Concepts
- Lecture 4
- Saeid Samiei
- Portsmouth Business School
2The Capital-Structure Question and The Pie Theory
- The value of a firm is defined to be the sum of
the value of the firms debt and the firms
equity. - V B S
- If the goal of the management of the firm is to
make the firm as valuable as possible, the the
firm should pick the debt-equity ratio that makes
the pie as big as possible.
S
B
Value of the Firm
3The Capital-Structure Question
- There are really two important questions
- Why should the stockholders care about maximizing
firm value? Perhaps they should be interested in
strategies that maximize shareholder value. - What is the ratio of debt-to-equity that
maximizes the shareholders value? - As it turns out, changes in capital structure
benefit the stockholders if and only if the value
of the firm increases.
4Financial Leverage, EPS, and ROE
Consider an all-equity firm that is considering
going into debt. (Maybe some of the original
shareholders want to cash out.)
- Current
- Assets 20,000
- Debt 0
- Equity 20,000
- Debt/Equity ratio 0.00
- Interest rate n/a
- Shares outstanding 400
- Share price 50
Proposed 20,000 8,000 12,000 2/3
8 240 50
5EPS and ROE Under Current Capital Structure
- Recession Expected Expansion
- EBIT 1,000 2,000 3,000
- Interest 0 0 0
- Net income 1,000 2,000 3,000
- EPS 2.50 5.00 7.50
- ROA 5 10 15
- ROE 5 10 15
- Current Shares Outstanding 400 shares
6EPS and ROE Under Proposed Capital Structure
- Recession Expected Expansion
- EBIT 1,000 2,000 3,000
- Interest 640 640 640
- Net income 360 1,360 2,360
- EPS 1.50 5.67 9.83
- ROA 5 10 15
- ROE 3 11 20
- Proposed Shares Outstanding 240 shares
7EPS and ROE Under Both Capital Structures
All-Equity Recession Expected Expansion EBIT 1
,000 2,000 3,000 Interest 0 0 0 Net
income 1,000 2,000 3,000 EPS 2.50 5.00 7.50
ROA 5 10 15 ROE 5 10 15 Current Shares
Outstanding 400 shares
- Levered Recession Expected Expansion
- EBIT 1,000 2,000 3,000
- Interest 640 640 640
- Net income 360 1,360 2,360
- EPS 1.50 5.67 9.83
- ROA 5 10 15
- ROE 3 11 20
- Proposed Shares Outstanding 240 shares
8Financial Leverage and EPS
12.00
Debt
10.00
8.00
No Debt
Advantage to debt
6.00
Break-even point
EPS
4.00
2.00
0.00
1,000
2,000
3,000
Disadvantage to debt
(2.00)
EBI in dollars, no taxes
EBIT
9The Financing Mix Question
- Is there an optimal mix of debt and equity?
- If yes, what is the trade off that lets us
determine this optimal mix? - If not, why not?
10The Modigliani Miller Proposition
- Both Modigliani Miller were awarded Nobel
Prizes, in part, due to their work on capital
structure - What does the MM theory state
- Value irrelevance The value of a firm is
independent of its leverage ratio. - Leverage (gearing) ratio D/(DE)
11MM thoughts
- Yogi Bear said "You better cut the pizza in four
pieces because I'm not hungry enough to eat six." - A dairy farmer cannot make more money by skimming
the cream and selling it separately from the
skimmed milk, - even though the cream sells for a higher prices
per kg than whole milk.
12Assumptions of the Modigliani-Miller Model
- Homogeneous Expectations
- Homogeneous Business Risk Classes
- Perpetual Cash Flows
- Perfect Capital Markets
- Perfect competition
- Firms and investors can borrow/lend at the same
rate - Equal access to all relevant information
- No transaction costs
- No taxes
13Homemade Leverage An Example
Recession Expected Expansion EPS of Unlevered
Firm 2.50 5.00 7.50 Earnings for 40
shares 100 200 300 Less interest on 800
(8) 64 64 64 Net Profits 36 136 236 ROE
(Net Profits / 1,200) 3 11 20 We are buying
40 shares of a 50 stock on margin. We get the
same ROE as if we bought into a levered firm. Our
personal debt equity ratio is
14Homemade (Un)Leverage An Example
- Recession Expected Expansion
- EPS of Levered Firm 1.50 5.67 9.83
- Earnings for 24 shares 36 136 236
- Plus interest on 800 (8) 64 64 64
- Net Profits 100 200 300
- ROE (Net Profits / 2,000) 5 10 15
- Buying 24 shares of an other-wise identical
levered firm along with the some of the firms
debt gets us to the ROE of the unlevered firm. - This is the fundamental insight of MM
15The MM Propositions I II (No Taxes)
- Proposition I
- Firm value is not affected by leverage
- VL VU
- Proposition II
- Leverage increases the risk and return to
stockholders - rs r0 (B / SL) (r0 - rB)
- rB is the interest rate (cost of debt)
- rs is the return on (levered) equity (cost of
equity) - r0 is the return on unlevered equity (cost of
capital) - B is the value of debt
- SL is the value of levered equity
16The MM Proposition I (No Taxes)
The derivation is straightforward
The present value of this stream of cash flows is
VL
The present value of this stream of cash flows is
VU
17The MM Proposition II (No Taxes)
The derivation is straightforward
18The Cost of Equity, the Cost of Debt, and the
Weighted Average Cost of Capital MM Proposition
II with No Corporate Taxes
Cost of capital r ()
r0
rB
rB
Debt-to-equity Ratio
19The MM Propositions I II (with Corporate Taxes)
- Proposition I (with Corporate Taxes)
- Firm value increases with leverage
- VL VU TC B
- Proposition II (with Corporate Taxes)
- Some of the increase in equity risk and return is
offset by interest tax shield - rS r0 (B/S)(1-TC)(r0 - rB)
- rB is the interest rate (cost of debt)
- rS is the return on equity (cost of equity)
- r0 is the return on unlevered equity (cost of
capital) - B is the value of debt
- S is the value of levered equity
20The MM Proposition I (Corp. Taxes)
The present value of this stream of cash flows is
VL
The present value of the first term is VU The
present value of the second term is TCB
21The MM Proposition II (Corp. Taxes)
Start with MM Proposition I with taxes
Since
The cash flows from each side of the balance
sheet must equal
Divide both sides by S
Which quickly reduces to
22The Effect of Financial Leverage on the Cost of
Debt and Equity Capital
Cost of capital r()
r0
rB
Debt-to-equityratio (B/S)
23Total Cash Flow to Investors Under Each Capital
Structure with Corp. Taxes
All-Equity Recession Expected Expansion EBIT 1
,000 2,000 3,000 Interest 0 0 0 EBT 1,000 2,00
0 3,000 Taxes (Tc 35 350 700 1,050 Total
Cash Flow to S/H 650 1,300 1,950
- Levered Recession Expected Expansion
- EBIT 1,000 2,000 3,000
- Interest (800 _at_ 8 ) 640 640 640
- EBT 360 1,360 2,360
- Taxes (Tc 35) 126 476 826
- Total Cash Flow 234640 468640 1,534640
- (to both S/H B/H) 874 1,524 2,174
- EBIT(1-Tc)TCrBB 650224 1,300224 1,95022
4 - 874 1,524 2,174
24Total Cash Flow to Investors Under Each Capital
Structure with Corp. Taxes
All-equity firm Levered firm
S
G
S
G
B
The levered firm pays less in taxes than does the
all-equity firm. Thus, the sum of the debt plus
the equity of the levered firm is greater than
the equity of the unlevered firm.
25Summary No Taxes
- In a world of no taxes, the value of the firm is
unaffected by capital structure. - This is MM Proposition I
- VL VU
- Prop I holds because shareholders can achieve any
pattern of payouts they desire with homemade
leverage. - In a world of no taxes, MM Proposition II states
that leverage increases the risk and return to
stockholders
26Summary Taxes
- In a world of taxes, but no bankruptcy costs, the
value of the firm increases with leverage. - This is MM Proposition I
- VL VU TC B
- Prop I holds because shareholders can achieve any
pattern of payouts they desire with homemade
leverage. - In a world of taxes, MM Proposition II states
that leverage increases the risk and return to
stockholders.
27Prospectus Bankruptcy Costs
- So far, we have seen MM suggest that financial
leverage does not matter, or imply that taxes
cause the optimal financial structure to be 100
debt. - In the real world, most executives do not like a
capital structure of 100 debt because that is a
state known as bankruptcy. - In the next chapter we will introduce the notion
of a limit on the use of debt financial
distress. - The important use of this chapter is to get
comfortable with MM algebra.