Title: Introduction to Central Services Branch
1Presentation to Portfolio Committee on
Correctional Services Precautionary Suspensions
April 2006-March 2007 in DCS 12 February 2008
Introduction to Central Services Branch Building
a caring correctional system that truly belongs
to all
2Purpose of presentation
- To brief the Portfolio Committee on
- Precautionary suspensions
- Interventions to manage suspensions
3BACKGROUND
- In the 2006/07 financial year the Department
reported 483 suspensions at a cost R9 794 001.85 - During discussions on the Annual report, the
Portfolio committee asked for a further breakdown
of the suspensions and interventions to deal with
the issue of suspensions
4Total suspensions per Region for the period 1
April 2006 to 31 March 2007
Region Total number of employees suspended Total number of employees suspended for longer than 30 days
GT 85 56
KZN 73 73
WC 128 110
LMN 44 16
FS NC 89 26
EC 64 44
Total 483 325
5Cost analysis on suspensions for the past four
years (2003/4 to 2006/7)
6Cost analysis cont..
- The cost analysis indicates an upward trend for
two years and a sharp decline in the reporting
year in question, that is 2006/07 financial year - The trends were influenced by a number of factors
as the Department strengthened resolve in
dealing with corruption and mal-administration
7Factors influencing suspensions
- In 2003/04 the Departmental Investigative Unit
had just been established and started functioning
fully in 2004/05 and effects were felt 2005/06. - As it was becoming effective, the numbers of
suspensions dropped as depicted in the graph
shows a decline in monetary terms from R34,058 m
in 2005/06 to R9, 794m in 2006/07
8Factors influencing suspensions cont
- Disciplinary processes relating to the Jali
Commission Report cases - High number of suspensions following the 2004/5
strike in the DCS more than 500 employees were
involved - The issue of a breakdown in trust in a security
institution necessitates suspension - a failure
to suspend can result in security breaches
9Factors influencing suspensions
- Dealing with cases relating to mass escapes
results in a large number of suspended officials
( e.g. Qalakabusha and Umthatha) - Nature of cases handled in DCS may be
complicated and necessitate longer periods of
investigations. - The need to give a clear message that corruption
and fraud will not be tolerated in an environment
where one wishes to create an ideal correctional
official.
10Factors influencing suspensions
- The DCS, is a security Department due to the
nature of its mandate, and is designated an
essential service in terms of the Labour
Relations Act (LRA) 65 of 1996. The designation
was proclaimed in a Government Gazette no.18276
dated 12 September 1997 . - In terms of the LRA DCS does not have the legal
mandate to suspend employees as a precautionary
measure without remuneration. - Suspension without pay can only be imposed as a
sanction following a guilty verdict in a
disciplinary hearing. (LRA, Act 66 of 1995 as
amended).
11Interventions in managing suspensions
- Training has been embarked upon to strengthen
investigations and processes of disciplinary
hearings - Training on the Disciplinary Code and Procedure
is continuing in the Regions to build capacity in
partnership with SAMDI. This training includes
training on the management of suspensions and the
time frames of suspensions as well as the
sanctions that will be imposed on managers who
fail to effectively manage suspensions - Since the beginning of the financial year 390 out
of a targeted 500 managers (for the financial
year) have undergone training. A second phase of
this training is being explored for next
financial year.
12Interventions in managing suspensions
- The emphasis as far as monitoring is concerned is
very much on information management to keep track
of suspensions. Previously lack of updated
records has been part of the problem in
management of suspensions - A monitoring tool has been developed for RCs and
ACs to monitor suspensions in their own areas.
This monitoring tool involves the maintenance and
monthly submission of Employee Relations
Management Information System (ER MIS)
information (which includes statistics on
suspensions, time frames of suspensions per
management area) to Head Office by regions. This
allows for the identification of red flag areas
and determination of timeous interventions
13Interventions in managing suspensions
- Head office personnel have recently started
conducting monitoring visits in the Regions.
These visits are aimed not only at monitoring but
empowering Area Coordinators, Regional
Coordinators Employee Relations (ER) and Human
Resources personnel on the management of the ER
MIS - both manual and electronic - So far Free State / Northern Cape has been
visited. Western Cape is being visited this
week Gauteng later in the month all regions
will be visited before the end of the financial
year. - Regional teams are being established to manage
suspensions in the regions
14Interventions in managing suspensions
- A number of communications have been issued to
the regions regarding the management of
suspensions - Letter was issued in March 2006 regarding the
maintenance of ER data - Circular was issued in December 2006 under the
signature of the then CDC Corporate Services, Mr
Petersen, regarding how to monitor suspensions
and the need to review them on a weekly basis. - Circular issued in December 2007 regarding the
need to maintain ER data integrity on
suspensions, disciplinary hearings and appeals as
a means to manage suspensions
15Current state of suspensions
- Indicates lower statistics which require further
analysis - Require further analysis to determine the Salary
Levels of suspended officials and length of
suspension - Do not show a high level of impact considering
the time frame of interventions since the
Departments engagement with the Committee - Presents an opportunity to further decrease the
numbers following the capacity building
initiatives
16SUMMARY OF TOTAL EMPLOYEE SUSPENSIONS PER REGION
FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL TO 31 DECEMBER 2007
Region Mar 07 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Cost
GT 85 80 84 121 60 120 53 54 52 58 5 347 361.33
KZN 73 38 27 26 26 42 43 43 39 44 2 437 716.19
WC 128 23 23 19 23 19 22 29 28 14 1 319 088.12
LMN 44 43 13 15 19 18 10 13 17 9 785 473.32
FS NC 89 23 23 11 15 11 13 16 5 26 1 041 372.26
EC 64 24 19 25 29 21 20 16 18 27 1 467 104.49
HO - 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 297 163.42
Total 194 192 219 175 234 164 174 162 181 12 695 79.13
17Opportunities
- The statistics indicate that suspensions in
December 2007 were lower than the close of the
previous financial year - Almost all regions reflect a decline although
some show a much better improvement than others - With proper management and accountability between
now and the end of the Financial year there could
be remarkable improvement
18CONCLUSION
- The Department
- continues to monitor suspensions closely to
ensure that they are managed and occur only where
necessary and for the shortest possible time. - Will emphasise enforce accountability from
Regional and Area Commissioners where these
matters are dealt with - Will strengthen its efforts and resolve to deal
with corruption, mal-administration and fraud
with conviction - Requests the Committee to note the decline in the
amount foregone through suspensions for the year
in question compared to the two previous years
19 Thank you Renewing our Pledge, A National
Partnership to Correct, Rehabilitate and
Reintegrate Offenders for a safer and secure
South Africa