Risk Management Requirements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Management Requirements

Description:

Demonstration of ongoing compliance with risk management ... PTD sponsored workshop. PTSV visits to each Rail Operator. Guidance material. 20. Purpose of Change ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: james987
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Management Requirements


1
Risk Management Requirements Mark Britton, PTSV
2
Risk Management Requirements
  • Risk Management Requirements in Rail Safety Act
  • Demonstration of ongoing compliance with risk
    management requirements
  • Exemption from ongoing requirements

3
Transport Act Risk Management Requirements
4
Rail Safety Act Risk Management Requirements
  • RSA Part 5 Accreditation of Rail infrastructure
    and rolling stock operations
  • Division 3, Risk Management Requirements for
    Accreditation
  • Division 6
  • Ongoing compliance with Risk management
    requirements
  • Exemption from ongoing compliance

5
RSA Risk Management Requirements for
Accreditation
  • Section 50, Identification of incidents and
    hazards, and risk assessments
  • Section 51, Measures to control likelihood,
    magnitude and severity of consequences of
    incidents

6
Section 50 - Identification of incidents and
hazards
  • 50 (1) to (3) requires rail operators to
    identify all (credible) incidents) which could
    occur, and all hazards that could contribute to
    those incidents.
  • Regulator will emphasise examination towards
    hazards capable of producing catastrophic
    consequences such as
  • Train to train collisions
  • Derailments
  • Level crossing incidents
  • Collisions with terminal infrastructure

7
Identification of incidents and hazards -Continued
  • Documentation should show rail operator has given
    consideration
  • Specific locations
  • Interface issues
  • Hazards during abnormal / emergency operations,
    maintenance, planned changes and other
    non-routine activities
  • Ways in which equipment might fail
  • Human Factors
  • Ways in which a sequence of events could lead to
    a major incident

8
Identification of incidents and hazards -Continued
  • What the regulator will expect to see
  • A documented hazard identification process
  • A list of hazards covering both normal operations
    and emergency conditions
  • A list that doesnt just consider historical data
  • Consideration human factors elements
  • Reference to interfaces and where risks are
    shared between organisations

9
Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
  • 50 (4) and (5) requirements for assessments of
    risks and hazards
  • Purpose is to provide
  • Information to make decisions regarding the
    acceptability of risk
  • Cost effective commitment of resources to
    accident reduction

10
Requirements for assessments of risks and hazards
  • What the regulator will expect to see
  • Documented procedures for risk analysis and
    assessment, including recognition of different
    techniques
  • Detail of assessment sufficient to give
    confidence that all significant contributors to
    risk have been evaluated
  • That the controls to combat the risks have been
    identified and are in the SMS
  • A process for continual improvement of risk
    analyses

11
Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
  • 50 (6a) Consider Hazards Cumulatively
  • Many major incidents have been caused by a number
    of hazards acting concurrently. E.g.,
  • Train rollaway insufficient park brakes,
    insufficient roll-out protection
  • Train derailed hit by other train Failure of
    defences to prevent derailment, failure of comms
    system to warn approaching train
  • A cumulative consideration necessary to
    understand the full range of incidents
  • Must consider common mode failures that can cause
    several hazards or failures to occur
    simultaneously

12
Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
  • 50 (6b) Use assessment methodologies
    appropriate to the hazard
  • Qualitative
  • Where risks are well understood and could not
    credibly result in catastrophic consequences
  • Semi-Qualitative
  • Where nature of risk and causation are well
    understood e.g. station fire, fall from train
  • Qualitative
  • For incidents which could have catastrophic
    consequences , or for which causation is not well
    understood

13
Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
  • 50 (7) Document all aspects of the assessment
  • All steps in the process should be traceable and
    the information used should be documented to
  • Permit review
  • Ensure reproducibility
  • Help understand assumptions made
  • Help validate results
  • Identify responsibilities
  • Identify performance measures
  • Reference monitoring and review of risk controls

14
Section 51, Measures to control likelihood,
Magnitude and severity of consequences of
incidents
  • Adopt measures to reduce likelihood and
    consequences So Far As Is Reasonably
    Practicable (SFARP)

15
Demonstrating SFARP
  • Demonstrate all that is reasonable is being done
  • Methods for demonstrating SFARP
  • Appropriate level of analysis commensurate with
    the risk
  • In most cases will simply involve determining
    whether benefits to be gained from alternative
    options outweigh the costs
  • Will involve an assessment of the risk, resources
    needed to avoid that risk and a comparison of the
    two.

16
SFARP Methods
17
RSA section 65,66
  • Accredited rail operator demonstrate compliance
    with Risk Management Requirements every 5years
  • Accredited tourist and heritage railway operators
    can apply for exemption from this ongoing
    demonstration

18
Rail Safety Regulations Risk matters to be
included in an SMS (Schedule 2, section 16)
  • Process to ensure compliance with the RSA
  • A description of control measures adopted
  • List controls at time of accreditation
  • Processes for considering new controls to
    continually reduce risk
  • A Risk Register
  • Lists hazards, risks, control measures and those
    responsible, key standards applicable to
    controls, cross referencing to SMS
  • A live document, regularly updated
  • Prioritise work
  • Greater the risk, greater the degree of
    thoroughness

19
DOI Plans of Assistance
  • PTD sponsored workshop
  • PTSV visits to each Rail Operator
  • Guidance material

20
Purpose of Change
  • Requires the applicant to show how its processes
    are designed and organised in the SMS to
    facilitate
  • Assessment of risks
  • Subsequent control of risks
  • Not simply a question of the rail Operator
    possessing a list of all their risks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com