Title: Risk Management Requirements
1Risk Management Requirements Mark Britton, PTSV
2Risk Management Requirements
- Risk Management Requirements in Rail Safety Act
- Demonstration of ongoing compliance with risk
management requirements - Exemption from ongoing requirements
3Transport Act Risk Management Requirements
4Rail Safety Act Risk Management Requirements
- RSA Part 5 Accreditation of Rail infrastructure
and rolling stock operations - Division 3, Risk Management Requirements for
Accreditation - Division 6
- Ongoing compliance with Risk management
requirements - Exemption from ongoing compliance
5RSA Risk Management Requirements for
Accreditation
- Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments - Section 51, Measures to control likelihood,
magnitude and severity of consequences of
incidents
6Section 50 - Identification of incidents and
hazards
- 50 (1) to (3) requires rail operators to
identify all (credible) incidents) which could
occur, and all hazards that could contribute to
those incidents. - Regulator will emphasise examination towards
hazards capable of producing catastrophic
consequences such as - Train to train collisions
- Derailments
- Level crossing incidents
- Collisions with terminal infrastructure
7Identification of incidents and hazards -Continued
- Documentation should show rail operator has given
consideration - Specific locations
- Interface issues
- Hazards during abnormal / emergency operations,
maintenance, planned changes and other
non-routine activities - Ways in which equipment might fail
- Human Factors
- Ways in which a sequence of events could lead to
a major incident
8Identification of incidents and hazards -Continued
- What the regulator will expect to see
- A documented hazard identification process
- A list of hazards covering both normal operations
and emergency conditions - A list that doesnt just consider historical data
- Consideration human factors elements
- Reference to interfaces and where risks are
shared between organisations
9Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
- 50 (4) and (5) requirements for assessments of
risks and hazards - Purpose is to provide
- Information to make decisions regarding the
acceptability of risk - Cost effective commitment of resources to
accident reduction
10Requirements for assessments of risks and hazards
- What the regulator will expect to see
- Documented procedures for risk analysis and
assessment, including recognition of different
techniques - Detail of assessment sufficient to give
confidence that all significant contributors to
risk have been evaluated - That the controls to combat the risks have been
identified and are in the SMS - A process for continual improvement of risk
analyses
11Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
- 50 (6a) Consider Hazards Cumulatively
- Many major incidents have been caused by a number
of hazards acting concurrently. E.g., - Train rollaway insufficient park brakes,
insufficient roll-out protection - Train derailed hit by other train Failure of
defences to prevent derailment, failure of comms
system to warn approaching train - A cumulative consideration necessary to
understand the full range of incidents - Must consider common mode failures that can cause
several hazards or failures to occur
simultaneously
12Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
- 50 (6b) Use assessment methodologies
appropriate to the hazard - Qualitative
- Where risks are well understood and could not
credibly result in catastrophic consequences - Semi-Qualitative
- Where nature of risk and causation are well
understood e.g. station fire, fall from train - Qualitative
- For incidents which could have catastrophic
consequences , or for which causation is not well
understood
13Section 50, Identification of incidents and
hazards, and risk assessments
- 50 (7) Document all aspects of the assessment
- All steps in the process should be traceable and
the information used should be documented to - Permit review
- Ensure reproducibility
- Help understand assumptions made
- Help validate results
- Identify responsibilities
- Identify performance measures
- Reference monitoring and review of risk controls
14Section 51, Measures to control likelihood,
Magnitude and severity of consequences of
incidents
- Adopt measures to reduce likelihood and
consequences So Far As Is Reasonably
Practicable (SFARP)
15Demonstrating SFARP
- Demonstrate all that is reasonable is being done
- Methods for demonstrating SFARP
- Appropriate level of analysis commensurate with
the risk - In most cases will simply involve determining
whether benefits to be gained from alternative
options outweigh the costs - Will involve an assessment of the risk, resources
needed to avoid that risk and a comparison of the
two.
16SFARP Methods
17RSA section 65,66
- Accredited rail operator demonstrate compliance
with Risk Management Requirements every 5years - Accredited tourist and heritage railway operators
can apply for exemption from this ongoing
demonstration
18Rail Safety Regulations Risk matters to be
included in an SMS (Schedule 2, section 16)
- Process to ensure compliance with the RSA
- A description of control measures adopted
- List controls at time of accreditation
- Processes for considering new controls to
continually reduce risk - A Risk Register
- Lists hazards, risks, control measures and those
responsible, key standards applicable to
controls, cross referencing to SMS - A live document, regularly updated
- Prioritise work
- Greater the risk, greater the degree of
thoroughness
19DOI Plans of Assistance
- PTD sponsored workshop
- PTSV visits to each Rail Operator
- Guidance material
20Purpose of Change
- Requires the applicant to show how its processes
are designed and organised in the SMS to
facilitate - Assessment of risks
- Subsequent control of risks
- Not simply a question of the rail Operator
possessing a list of all their risks