Title: What can we achieve with eSafety
1What can we achieve with e-Safety
- Dr B. COUSYN
- PSA Peugeot Citroën
- e-Safety Working Group
- Brussels June 10, 2002
2Contents
- Introduction Historical Background
- - ITS and main ITS Programs
- - European Projects
- ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems)
- Safety Model
- Principles- Vehicle Safe Performances
- e-Safety technologies
- Autonomous vs Interactive technologies
- Conclusions and recommendations
3The main ITS programs (Europe, USA, Japan)
ALI
PROMETHEUS
DRIVE 1
DRIVE 2
TELEMATICS / TAP - IST
ITS IVI / ITI
ERGS
MOBILITY 2000
IVHS
AHS
85
90
91
70
75
80
93
94
95
96
97
01
98
99
00
92
CACS
RACS
VICS
AMTCS
ARTS
ITS AHS-i, AHS-c,
AHS-a, ASV
JAPAN
SSVS
ASV
UTMS
AHS
4Integrated system of people, roads and vehicles
Information and Communications Technologies
Transport efficiency,
comfort, safety
utilizing advanced data communication
technologies in a complex environment
5 6(No Transcript)
7Advance Driver Assistance Systems
- Research from the different programs (PROMETHEUS,
DRIVE, and projects from the 4th and 5th
Framework programs) indicated the potential for
ADAS systems to provide additional comfort to
drivers and to improve safety . - Example for ADAS
- ACC, stopGo, lane departure warning, emergency
braking, collision avoidance, enhanced vision
systems..
84Th Framework Program (1994-1998)ADAS projects
(Telematics Application Prog.)
Longitudinal Driver Support - Anti-Collision
ASSIST
Green Wave Stop Go Urban Drive Control
Lateral Driver Support - LACOS
Adaptive Diagnosis and Management ADAPT
Centralised Vocal Interfaces Management -
CEMVOCAS
Tow-Bar / Platooning - CHAUFFEUR
Integrated Driver Support IN-ARTE
Drivers Status Emergency Management - SAVE
Legal aspects and User Acceptance RESPONSE
Benefits and Deployment Issues - AHSEA
95th Framework Program (1998-2002)some ADAS
projects ( IST program)
New Sensor Systems and Data fusion CARSENSE
Multifunctional Radar Network - RADARNET
New Attributes for Digital Maps - NEXTMAP
Pre-Crash Detection - CHAMELEON
Protection of Vulnerable Road Users - PROTECTOR
Intelligent In-Vehicle Terminal - INVETE
Tow Bar / Platooning - CHAUFFEUR II
Vehicle Harmonised Multimedia HMI - COMUNICAR
10ITS Applications
- More Technology pushed than Market pulled
- Not totally technology mature
- Difficulties various actors ,different product
life cycles - Dont forget the Customers !
- Are customers ready to pay for ITS products
- and services ?
11Primary Safety Model(Draft from ACEA TF AS)
Abnormal driving
Phase 3 Crash Unavoidable
Phase 5 Post Crash
Access to the system
Ergonomics
Lighting
Visibility
Braking
Handling
Active or Primary Safety Accident
Avoidance and/or Crash Severity Reduction
Passive or Secondary Safety Injury
Avoidance and/or Injury Severity Reduction
12Principles Vehicle Safe Performance
- Reliable
- Manufacturers cannot allow faults in
vehicles - Active systems are here to help drivers,
they are not going to - replace them
- Affordable
- e-safety requires expensive technologies or
services that customers are not always willing to
pay for - Compatible
- Different actors, different regions,
different dynamics between - products (cars/electronics, telematics,
multimedia equipments) -
- Limits of Drivers abilities (workload)
13How to improve Safety ?
-
- To achieve reduction in fatalities we need to
develop clear priorities based on potential
impact and cost - e-safety initiative is one of the tools which
will enable us to achieve results in the area of
Safety - Safety is not only about technology, other issues
need to be solved, such as - legal, liability, certification, privacy and
standardization issues
14How to improve Safety ?
- Fatal accidents in France (2001)
- young drivers, motorcycles drivers
- Main causes for fatalities ?
- main causes are driver-related
- Violation (seat belt usage, Alcohol/drug, speed)
- Drowsiness, distraction
- Errors, misjudgements
- consistent accident causation data is still
needed -
-
-
15What can we achieve with e-Safety ?
Source ADASE II
16What can we achieve with e-safety?
- Autonomous vehicle Technologies
- Vehicle manufacturers and their suppliers need to
develop the - electronic architecture and standard interfaces
- Standardization of those technologies is the
responsibility - of manufacturers and their suppliers
- We need to give answers on different challenges
(to clarify - legal liability issues, to remove any regulatory
barriers..)
17What can we achieve with e-safety?
- Interactive Technologies
- Vehicle/Infrastructure communication
- (ongoing projects with ERTICO)
- Real time traffic information RTTI
- Emergency call
-
- Vehicle/Vehicle communication
-
18What can we achieve with e-safety?
- Vehicle/Infrastructure communication
- Example of projects
- Aida, Alzira,Marta, Delta..
- Emerge
- Vehicle /Vehicle communication
- example of projects
- IVHW ( Inter Vehicle Hazard Warning)
-
19Example Emergency Call
- E-call
- Technologies issues are well identified some
private initiatives are operational. - A European-wide least cost e-call system as soon
as possible. - EMERGE project just launched.
- Joint reflection of industry and Commission is
needed towards deployment, viable business model. -
20Conclusions and recommendations
- Manufacturers will maintain responsibility for
vehicle-related technologies with enabling
assistance from the Commission (legal, research,
regulatory barriers) - will work in partnership on other priorities
21Conclusions and recommendations
- ERTICO must act on
- e-Call to ensure the success of EMERGE and that
its outcomes are implemented - Nomad HMI to ensure equivalent compliance
- RTTI to support data collection and processing
from all sources and broadcast by a central body - Interoperability of communications
22Conclusions and recommendations
- Commission to act on
- e-Call ensuring the implementation
- RTTI as catalyst ensuring access to data
collection, processing broadcast - Elimination of legal and regulatory bottlenecks
- Continuous support of Integrated Safety through
RTD program