Relevant Costs: Make or Buy? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Relevant Costs: Make or Buy?

Description:

Determine if the decision was a good one (feedback) 'Relevant' Information ... Initially, WWA considers declining the charter because of a $40,000 loss. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:238
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: david174
Category:
Tags: buy | charter | costs | make | one | relevant

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Relevant Costs: Make or Buy?


1
Relevant Costs Make or Buy?
  • OVCManagerial Accounting, Fall 2002
  • David B. Hamm, MBA, CPA

2
Steps in the Decision-Making Process (the Five
Ds)
  • Define the problem
  • Develop alternatives
  • Decide which alternative is best
  • Do what is indicated
  • Determine if the decision was a good one
    (feedback)

3
Relevant Information
  • Information is relevant if is pertinent to a
    decision problemit will directly affect, or be
    affected by, the decision
  • Information must also be accurate
  • Information must also be timely

4
Cost considerations
  • Sunk costs have already been incurred and can
    not be changed by any current or future decision.
    Therefore no longer relevant.
  • Differential costs difference between the costs
    of two (or more) decision alternatives
  • Incremental costs additional cost differential
    of one alternative
  • Opportunity costs potential benefit that must be
    given up when an alternative is selected

5
Accept or Reject
  • We receive a special ordernot part of routine
    production/services. Do we accept the order?
  • YES, if the orders contribution margin (Sales
    VC) will cover any incremental fixed costs or
    opportunity costs and still provide a net margin
    toward other operations
  • NO, if the order does not

6
Accept or RejectIllustration (text, p. 612)
WorldWide Airways is offered a special charter
flight paying 150,000. Its routine costs
assigned to each flight are 190,000 (VC
90,000, allocated FC100,000). Initially, WWA
considers declining the charter because of a
40,000 loss.
7
Accept or Reject Illustration (2)
Butthe fixed costs are not incremental to this
flight they are fixed for all current
operations. Only the variable costs need be
considered. Also, since the charter doesnt
involve reservations or ticketing, there is a
variable cost savings
Since the CM of the special order is positive
and can contribute to other operations, the offer
should be accepted.
8
Accept or Reject Illustration (3)
  • Above illustration assumes there is excess
    production capacity, i.e., plane, crew,
    facilities are available for the flight.
  • If there is no excess capacity and another job
    must be cancelled to accept the special order,
    the contribution margin of the alternative job
    becomes an opportunity cost that must be included
    in the special order. Now it may not be as
    attractive. (See p. 613)

9
Make or Buy (Outsourcing)
  • Involves a choice between producing a
    product/service in-house or outsourcing it.
  • Decision criteria is the similar to special
    orders
  • Allocate relevant costs to each alternative
  • Compare for cost savings (or not)

10
Make or BuyIllustration (p. 615)
WWA considers cost of making desserts vs.
outsourcing initial costs of making appear
higher because of FC allocation, but when
considering relevant costs
11
Make or Buy Illustration (2)
Alternative evaluationconsider only incremental
costs savings
Conclusiondont assume outsourcing will
eliminate all current production costssome are
sunk costs!
12
Add or Drop (Service / Product / Segment)
  • This is identical to segment reportingmust
    consider the segment margin each product or
    service or department/division/segment
    contributes to the firm.
  • Againdont assume all fixed costs will be
    eliminatedsome are sunk. Consider only
    incremental / relevant costs.

13
Joint Products Sell or Process Further
  • If a production process can result in two or more
    products, how do we allocate costs between/among
    them?
  • Common allocation method is relative sales value
    method in which costs are allocated based on
    their sales values at the split-off point
  • See pg. 619 for illustration of relative sales
    value allocation

14
Joint Costs (2)
  • Butwhen deciding whether to sell a product at
    split-off point, or whether to process it
    further, remember that the joint cost has
    already been incurredit is already sunk.
  • Consider only incremental revenue from processing
    further less incremental (separable) processing
    costs required to earn that incremental revenue!
    (see pg. 620)

15
Pitfalls to avoid in cost allocation
  • Sunk costsignore them!
  • Unitized fixed costs (FC per unit) bewaremay
    be a way to hide sunk costs
  • Allocated fixed costsbewareidentify the
    avoidable costs, others are sunk
  • Opportunity costsdont ignore these! Be sure to
    include in your analysis.

16
Stop for Class Exercises
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com