Title: Relevant%20Cost%20Decisions
1Relevant Cost Decisions
- DECISION MAKING IN THE SHORT TERM
2Decisions
- A decision model is a formal method of making a
choice, often involving both quantitative and
qualitative analyses - A relevant cost is a cost that differs between
alternatives.
3Five-Step Decision-Making Process
4Relevance
- Relevant Information has two characteristics
- It occurs in the future
- It differs among the alternative courses of
action - Relevant Costs expected future costs
- Relevant Revenues expected future revenues
5Identifying Relevant Costs
- Costs that can be eliminated (in whole or in
part) by choosing one alternative over another
are avoidable costs. Avoidable costs are relevant
costs. - Unavoidable costs are never relevant and include
- Sunk costs.
- Future costs that do not differ between the
alternatives.
6Identifying Relevant Costs
- gather all costs associated with the alternatives
- eliminate all sunk costs
- Eliminate all future costs that dont differ
between alternatives - left are the avoidable costs
7Irrelevance
- Historical costs are past costs that are
irrelevant to decision making - Also called Sunk Costs- cost that has already
been incurred and that cannot be avoided
regardless of what a manager decides to do
8Types of Information
- Quantitative factors are outcomes that can be
measured in numerical terms - Qualitative factors are outcomes that are
difficult to measure accurately in numerical
terms, such as satisfaction - Are just as important as quantitative factors
even though they are difficult to measure
9Terminology
- Incremental Cost the additional total cost
incurred for an activity - Differential Cost the difference in total cost
between two alternatives - Incremental Revenue the additional total
revenue from an activity - Differential Revenue the difference in total
revenue between two alternatives
10Types of Decisions
- One-Time-Only Special Orders
- Insourcing vs. Outsourcing
- Make or Buy
- Product-Mix
- Customer Profitability
- Branch / Segment Adding or Discontinuing
- Equipment Replacement
11One-Time-Only Special Orders
- Accepting or rejecting special orders when there
is idle production capacity and the special
orders have no long-run implications - Decision Rule does the special order generate
additional operating income? - Yes accept
- No reject
12One-Time-Only Special Orders
- Compares relevant revenues and relevant costs to
determine profitability
13Special Orders
- Acki Company receives a one-time order that is
not considered part of its normal ongoing
business. - Acki Company only produces one type of silver key
chain with a unit variable cost of TL 16. Normal
selling price is TL 40 per unit. - A company in KKTC offers to purchase 3,000 units
for TL 20 per unit. - Annual capacity is 10,000 units, and annual fixed
costs total TL78,000, but Acki company is
currently producing and selling only 5,000 units.
Should Acki accept the offer?
14Special Orders
15Special Orders
- If Acki accepts the offer, net income will
increase by TL 12.000.
Using the incremental approach Special order
contribution margin TL20 TL 16 TL 4
Change in income TL 4 3,000 units TL
12.000.
16Potential Problems with Relevant-Cost Analysis
- Avoid incorrect general assumptions about
information, especially - All variable costs are relevant and all fixed
costs are irrelevant - There are notable exceptions for both costs
17Potential Problems with Relevant-Cost Analysis
- Problems with using unit-cost data
- Including irrelevant costs in error
- Using the same unit-cost with different output
levels - Fixed costs per unit change with different levels
of output
18Avoiding Potential Problems with Relevant-Cost
Analysis
- Focus on Total Revenues and Total Costs, not
their per-unit equivalents - Continually evaluate data to ensure that they
meet the requirements of relevant information
19Insourcing vs. Outsourcing
- Insourcing producing goods or services within
an organization - Outsourcing purchasing goods or services from
outside vendors - Also called the Make or Buy decision
- Decision Rule Select the option that will
provide the firm with the lowest cost, and
therefore the highest profit.
20Qualitative Factors
- Nonquantitative factors may be extremely
important in an evaluation process, yet do not
show up directly in calculations - Quality Requirements
- Reputation of Outsourcer
- Employee Morale
- Logistical Considerations distance from plant,
etc.
21Opportunity Costs
- Opportunity Cost is the contribution to operating
income that is forgone by not using a limited
resource in its next-best alternative use - How much profit did the firm lose out on by
not selecting this alternative? - The economic benefits that are foregone as a
result of pursuing some course of action.
Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays
and are not recorded in the accounts of an
organization. - Special type of Opportunity Cost Holding Cost
for Inventory. Funds tied up in inventory are
not available for investment elsewhere
22The Make or Buy Decision
- A decision concerning whether an item should be
produced internally or purchased from an outside
supplier is called a make or buy decision.
23The Make or Buy Decision
- MA Company is thinking of buying a part that is
currently used in one of its products from
outside. - The unit cost to make this part is
24The Make or Buy Decision
- General factory overhead is allocated on the
basis of direct labor hours and is not going to
change if the parts are bought from outside. - The 90TL unit cost is based on 20,000 parts
produced each year. - An outside supplier has offered to provide the
20,000 parts at a cost of 70TL per part. - Should we accept the suppliers offer?
25The Make or Buy Decision
Sunk Cost
Not avoidable and is irrelevant. If the product
is dropped, it will be reallocated to other
products.
26The Make or Buy Decision
- DECISION RULE
- In deciding whether to accept the outside
suppliers offer, MA isolated the relevant costs
of making the part by eliminating - The sunk costs.
- The future costs that will not differ between
making or buying the parts.
27Product-Mix Decisions
- The decisions made by a company about which
products to sell and in what quantities - Decision Rule (with a constraint) choose the
product that produces the highest contribution
margin per unit of the constraining resource
28Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- Firms often face the problem of deciding how to
best utilize a constrained resource. - Usually, fixed costs are not affected by this
particular decision, so management can focus on
maximizing total contribution margin.
29Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- UM Company produces two products and selected
data is shown below
30Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- Machine A1 is the constrained resource. There is
excess capacity on all other machines. Machine
A1 is being used at 100 of its capacity, and has
a capacity of 2,400 minutes per week. - Should UM focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?
31Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the constrained resource, machine A1.
Product 2 should be emphasized. Provides more
valuable use of the constrained resource machine
A1, yielding a contribution margin of TL 30 per
minute as opposed to TL 24 for Product 1.
32Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the scarce resource, machine A1. - Lets see how this plan would work.
If there are no other considerations, the best
plan would be to produce to meet current demand
for Product 2 and then use remaining capacity to
make Product 1.
33Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- Lets see how this plan would work.
34Utilization of a Constrained Resource
- According to the plan, we will produce 2,200
units of Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Our
contribution margin looks like this.
The total contribution margin for UM is TL 64,200.
35Managing Constraints
Produce only what can be sold.
Finding ways to process more units through a
resource bottleneck
At the bottleneck itself Improve the
process Add overtime or another shift
Hire new workers or acquired more
machines Subcontract production
Eliminate waste.
Streamline production process.
36Adding or Dropping Customers
- Decision Rule Does adding or dropping a customer
add operating income to the firm? - Yes add or dont drop
- No drop or dont add
- Decision is based on profitability of the
customer, not how much revenue a customer
generates
37Adding or DiscontinuingBranches or Segments
- Decision Rule Does adding or discontinuing a
branch or segment add operating income to the
firm? - Yes add or dont discontinue
- No discontinue or dont add
- Decision is based on profitability of the branch
or segment, not how much revenue the branch or
segment generates
38Adding/Dropping Segments
Should the company drop digital instruments
division?
General Factory Overhead and General
Administrative Expenses are unavoidable costs.
Assume that the equipment used in manufacturing
digital instruments has no resale value or
alternative use.
39Incremental Approach
- DECISION RULE
- UM should drop the digital instruments division
only if the avoided fixed costs of the division
exceed lost contribution margin of this division.
40Incremental Approach
What about depreciation?
41Comparative Income Approach
- Prepare comparative income statements showing
results with and without the digital instruments
division.
42(No Transcript)
43Joint Product Costs
- In some industries, a number of end products are
produced from a single raw material input. - Two or more products produced from a common input
are called joint products. - The point in the manufacturing process where each
joint product can be recognized as a separate
product is called the split-off point.
44Joint Products
Joint Costs
Oil
Common Production Process
Joint Input
Gasoline
Chemicals
Split-Off Point
45Joint Products
Joint Costs
Final Sale
Separate Processing
Oil
Common Production Process
Joint Input
Final Sale
Gasoline
Separate Processing
Final Sale
Chemicals
Separate Product Costs
Split-Off Point
46The Pitfalls of Allocation of Joint Costs
- Joint costs are really common costs incurred to
simultaneously produce a variety of end products. - Joint costs are often allocated to end products
on the basis of the relative sales value of each
product or on some other basis.
47Sell or Process Further
- Decision Rule
- It will always profitable to continue processing
a joint product after the split-off point so long
as the incremental revenue exceeds the
incremental processing costs incurred after the
split-off point. - Lets look at the Kere example.
48Sell or Process Further
- Kere Company cuts logs from which unfinished
lumber and sawdust are the immediate joint
products. - Unfinished lumber is sold as is or processed
further into finished lumber. - Sawdust can also be sold as is to gardening
wholesalers or processed further into
ready-logs.
49Sell or Process Further
- Data about Keres joint products includes
50Sell or Process Further
Should Kere process the lumber further and sell
the sawdust as is?
51Behavioral Implications
- Despite the quantitative nature of some aspects
of decision making, not all managers will choose
the best alternative for the firm - Managers could engage in self-serving behavior
such as delaying needed equipment maintenance in
order to meet their personal profitability quotas
for bonus consideration