Relevant%20Cost%20Decisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Relevant%20Cost%20Decisions

Description:

Title: CHAPTER 11 Author: Michael Flores Last modified by: ref Created Date: 12/5/2004 1:49:05 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: Michael3571
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Relevant%20Cost%20Decisions


1
Relevant Cost Decisions
  • DECISION MAKING IN THE SHORT TERM

2
Decisions
  • A decision model is a formal method of making a
    choice, often involving both quantitative and
    qualitative analyses
  • A relevant cost is a cost that differs between
    alternatives.

3
Five-Step Decision-Making Process
4
Relevance
  • Relevant Information has two characteristics
  • It occurs in the future
  • It differs among the alternative courses of
    action
  • Relevant Costs expected future costs
  • Relevant Revenues expected future revenues

5
Identifying Relevant Costs
  • Costs that can be eliminated (in whole or in
    part) by choosing one alternative over another
    are avoidable costs. Avoidable costs are relevant
    costs.
  • Unavoidable costs are never relevant and include
  • Sunk costs.
  • Future costs that do not differ between the
    alternatives.

6
Identifying Relevant Costs
  • gather all costs associated with the alternatives
  • eliminate all sunk costs
  • Eliminate all future costs that dont differ
    between alternatives
  • left are the avoidable costs

7
Irrelevance
  • Historical costs are past costs that are
    irrelevant to decision making
  • Also called Sunk Costs- cost that has already
    been incurred and that cannot be avoided
    regardless of what a manager decides to do

8
Types of Information
  • Quantitative factors are outcomes that can be
    measured in numerical terms
  • Qualitative factors are outcomes that are
    difficult to measure accurately in numerical
    terms, such as satisfaction
  • Are just as important as quantitative factors
    even though they are difficult to measure

9
Terminology
  • Incremental Cost the additional total cost
    incurred for an activity
  • Differential Cost the difference in total cost
    between two alternatives
  • Incremental Revenue the additional total
    revenue from an activity
  • Differential Revenue the difference in total
    revenue between two alternatives

10
Types of Decisions
  • One-Time-Only Special Orders
  • Insourcing vs. Outsourcing
  • Make or Buy
  • Product-Mix
  • Customer Profitability
  • Branch / Segment Adding or Discontinuing
  • Equipment Replacement

11
One-Time-Only Special Orders
  • Accepting or rejecting special orders when there
    is idle production capacity and the special
    orders have no long-run implications
  • Decision Rule does the special order generate
    additional operating income?
  • Yes accept
  • No reject

12
One-Time-Only Special Orders
  • Compares relevant revenues and relevant costs to
    determine profitability

13
Special Orders
  • Acki Company receives a one-time order that is
    not considered part of its normal ongoing
    business.
  • Acki Company only produces one type of silver key
    chain with a unit variable cost of TL 16. Normal
    selling price is TL 40 per unit.
  • A company in KKTC offers to purchase 3,000 units
    for TL 20 per unit.
  • Annual capacity is 10,000 units, and annual fixed
    costs total TL78,000, but Acki company is
    currently producing and selling only 5,000 units.

Should Acki accept the offer?
14
Special Orders
15
Special Orders
  • If Acki accepts the offer, net income will
    increase by TL 12.000.

Using the incremental approach Special order
contribution margin TL20 TL 16 TL 4
Change in income TL 4 3,000 units TL
12.000.
16
Potential Problems with Relevant-Cost Analysis
  • Avoid incorrect general assumptions about
    information, especially
  • All variable costs are relevant and all fixed
    costs are irrelevant
  • There are notable exceptions for both costs

17
Potential Problems with Relevant-Cost Analysis
  • Problems with using unit-cost data
  • Including irrelevant costs in error
  • Using the same unit-cost with different output
    levels
  • Fixed costs per unit change with different levels
    of output

18
Avoiding Potential Problems with Relevant-Cost
Analysis
  • Focus on Total Revenues and Total Costs, not
    their per-unit equivalents
  • Continually evaluate data to ensure that they
    meet the requirements of relevant information

19
Insourcing vs. Outsourcing
  • Insourcing producing goods or services within
    an organization
  • Outsourcing purchasing goods or services from
    outside vendors
  • Also called the Make or Buy decision
  • Decision Rule Select the option that will
    provide the firm with the lowest cost, and
    therefore the highest profit.

20
Qualitative Factors
  • Nonquantitative factors may be extremely
    important in an evaluation process, yet do not
    show up directly in calculations
  • Quality Requirements
  • Reputation of Outsourcer
  • Employee Morale
  • Logistical Considerations distance from plant,
    etc.

21
Opportunity Costs
  • Opportunity Cost is the contribution to operating
    income that is forgone by not using a limited
    resource in its next-best alternative use
  • How much profit did the firm lose out on by
    not selecting this alternative?
  • The economic benefits that are foregone as a
    result of pursuing some course of action.
    Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays
    and are not recorded in the accounts of an
    organization.
  • Special type of Opportunity Cost Holding Cost
    for Inventory. Funds tied up in inventory are
    not available for investment elsewhere

22
The Make or Buy Decision
  • A decision concerning whether an item should be
    produced internally or purchased from an outside
    supplier is called a make or buy decision.

23
The Make or Buy Decision
  • MA Company is thinking of buying a part that is
    currently used in one of its products from
    outside.
  • The unit cost to make this part is

24
The Make or Buy Decision
  • General factory overhead is allocated on the
    basis of direct labor hours and is not going to
    change if the parts are bought from outside.
  • The 90TL unit cost is based on 20,000 parts
    produced each year.
  • An outside supplier has offered to provide the
    20,000 parts at a cost of 70TL per part.
  • Should we accept the suppliers offer?

25
The Make or Buy Decision
Sunk Cost
Not avoidable and is irrelevant. If the product
is dropped, it will be reallocated to other
products.
26
The Make or Buy Decision
  • DECISION RULE
  • In deciding whether to accept the outside
    suppliers offer, MA isolated the relevant costs
    of making the part by eliminating
  • The sunk costs.
  • The future costs that will not differ between
    making or buying the parts.

27
Product-Mix Decisions
  • The decisions made by a company about which
    products to sell and in what quantities
  • Decision Rule (with a constraint) choose the
    product that produces the highest contribution
    margin per unit of the constraining resource

28
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • Firms often face the problem of deciding how to
    best utilize a constrained resource.
  • Usually, fixed costs are not affected by this
    particular decision, so management can focus on
    maximizing total contribution margin.

29
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • UM Company produces two products and selected
    data is shown below

30
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • Machine A1 is the constrained resource. There is
    excess capacity on all other machines. Machine
    A1 is being used at 100 of its capacity, and has
    a capacity of 2,400 minutes per week.
  • Should UM focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?

31
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
    of the constrained resource, machine A1.

Product 2 should be emphasized. Provides more
valuable use of the constrained resource machine
A1, yielding a contribution margin of TL 30 per
minute as opposed to TL 24 for Product 1.
32
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
    of the scarce resource, machine A1.
  • Lets see how this plan would work.

If there are no other considerations, the best
plan would be to produce to meet current demand
for Product 2 and then use remaining capacity to
make Product 1.
33
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • Lets see how this plan would work.

34
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
  • According to the plan, we will produce 2,200
    units of Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Our
    contribution margin looks like this.

The total contribution margin for UM is TL 64,200.
35
Managing Constraints
Produce only what can be sold.
Finding ways to process more units through a
resource bottleneck
At the bottleneck itself Improve the
process Add overtime or another shift
Hire new workers or acquired more
machines Subcontract production
Eliminate waste.
Streamline production process.
36
Adding or Dropping Customers
  • Decision Rule Does adding or dropping a customer
    add operating income to the firm?
  • Yes add or dont drop
  • No drop or dont add
  • Decision is based on profitability of the
    customer, not how much revenue a customer
    generates

37
Adding or DiscontinuingBranches or Segments
  • Decision Rule Does adding or discontinuing a
    branch or segment add operating income to the
    firm?
  • Yes add or dont discontinue
  • No discontinue or dont add
  • Decision is based on profitability of the branch
    or segment, not how much revenue the branch or
    segment generates

38
Adding/Dropping Segments
Should the company drop digital instruments
division?
General Factory Overhead and General
Administrative Expenses are unavoidable costs.
Assume that the equipment used in manufacturing
digital instruments has no resale value or
alternative use.
39
Incremental Approach
  • DECISION RULE
  • UM should drop the digital instruments division
    only if the avoided fixed costs of the division
    exceed lost contribution margin of this division.

40
Incremental Approach
What about depreciation?
41
Comparative Income Approach
  • Prepare comparative income statements showing
    results with and without the digital instruments
    division.

42
(No Transcript)
43
Joint Product Costs
  • In some industries, a number of end products are
    produced from a single raw material input.
  • Two or more products produced from a common input
    are called joint products.
  • The point in the manufacturing process where each
    joint product can be recognized as a separate
    product is called the split-off point.

44
Joint Products
Joint Costs
Oil
Common Production Process
Joint Input
Gasoline
Chemicals
Split-Off Point
45
Joint Products
Joint Costs
Final Sale
Separate Processing
Oil
Common Production Process
Joint Input
Final Sale
Gasoline
Separate Processing
Final Sale
Chemicals
Separate Product Costs
Split-Off Point
46
The Pitfalls of Allocation of Joint Costs
  • Joint costs are really common costs incurred to
    simultaneously produce a variety of end products.
  • Joint costs are often allocated to end products
    on the basis of the relative sales value of each
    product or on some other basis.

47
Sell or Process Further
  • Decision Rule
  • It will always profitable to continue processing
    a joint product after the split-off point so long
    as the incremental revenue exceeds the
    incremental processing costs incurred after the
    split-off point.
  • Lets look at the Kere example.

48
Sell or Process Further
  • Kere Company cuts logs from which unfinished
    lumber and sawdust are the immediate joint
    products.
  • Unfinished lumber is sold as is or processed
    further into finished lumber.
  • Sawdust can also be sold as is to gardening
    wholesalers or processed further into
    ready-logs.

49
Sell or Process Further
  • Data about Keres joint products includes

50
Sell or Process Further
Should Kere process the lumber further and sell
the sawdust as is?
51
Behavioral Implications
  • Despite the quantitative nature of some aspects
    of decision making, not all managers will choose
    the best alternative for the firm
  • Managers could engage in self-serving behavior
    such as delaying needed equipment maintenance in
    order to meet their personal profitability quotas
    for bonus consideration
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com