Title: Broadband 2005 Current Status
1Broadband 2005Current Status Future
Trends3G and BeyondJannie van Zyl 1st
November 2005
2Agenda
- Vodacom Current Status
- GPRS
- EDGE
- UMTS
- Wireless Network Trends
- HSDPA / HSUPA
- WiMax
- OFDM
- UMA / Mesh Networks
3Where are we Today?
4First Mobile Phone ?
No Ringtones or SMS
5First Mobile Car Phone ?
1924
1952
6First Portable Mobile Phone ?
1973
7New Terminal Capabilities
Multiplicity of Local Connectivity
Mobile Storage Revolution
New Ways of Displaying Content
- 20 GByte is enough for your entire music
collection your entire photo album 20hrs of
home movies 8 hours of DVD quality movies a
bevy of games
8New Form Factors
2007?
9Where are we Today?
- Current South African Landscape
10Vodacom Coverage gt 16M Subscribers
- 2G GPRS
- gt 6300 Base Stations
- gt 70 Land Area Coverage
- gt 97.5 Population Coverage
- gt 99.7 Availability
- 2G EDGE
- gt 37 Land Area Coverage
- gt 32 Population Coverage
- 3G WCDMA
- 1500 Node Bs (Base Stations)
- gt 99.3 Availability
11EDGE Coverage Aug 2005
123G Coverage
13Vodacom 3G Coverage
- Major Metros
- Holiday Areas
- All major airports
- Major hotels, conference venues and business
centers - Sites with high GPRS usage
- Coverage for key business partners
- Seamless Integration with 2G
- Target through-put of 300kbits/second avg.
14Network Futures
15GSM Evolution towards 3G UMTS
2G
2G
3G
UMTS 1st Release
Theoretical maximum data speeds
GPRS
HSCSD
EDGE
GSM CSD
9.6 kb/s
57 kb/s
170 kb/s
470 kb/s
2048 kb/s
163G Evolution towards 4G
?
?
WiMax
70 Mb/s
4G OFDM MIMO
11 - 54 Mb/s
MBWA (Wide Area)
WiFi (Local Area)
50 - 100 Mb/s?
HSDPA/ HSUPA
15 Mb/s
UMTS (Dense)
14.4 Mb/s
UMTS (Wide Area)
OFDM Orthogonal FDM
2Mb/s
384 kb/s
Theoretical max data rates depend on radio
conditions /or system options eg bandwidth. Time
scales are approximate/illustrative. The terms
3G, Evolved 3G, Super 3G, Beyond 3G, 4G etc are
not officially defined.
3G 3G MBWA 4G
2003 2004 2006 2008
17Network Futures
18Constraints on Coverage
- Limit for a non-fading channel was established
by Claude Shanon in a classic paper in 1948.
Minimum received signal defined by
Eb / No -1.6dB
Energy per Bit
Noise Spectral Density
- Depends on
- A Fundamental Limit (Physics)
- Receiver Performance
- Interference
- Depends on
- Transmitter Power
- Size of Antennas
- Path Loss (Frequency)
- Modern systems are getting closer to this limit,
so unless we use bigger antennas or more transmit
power, more bits/second means smaller cells,
whatever the radio access technology - Uplink generally more constrained because of
batter power and EMF safety limits
19Constraints on Coverage
Range
20Constraints on Coverage
- higher data rate more sites
3 Sector base station at 25m to outdoor PC card
Data Rate
Site density
100Mb/s 0.21km
50
10Mb/s 0.41km
15
3.6
1Mb/s 0.78km
100kb/s
1.49km
1
Range
21Constraints on Coverage
- higher frequency more sites
- higher data rate more sites
3 Sector base station at 25m to outdoor PC card
Data Rate
Site density
100Mb/s 0.21km
50
10Mb/s 0.41km
15
3.6
1Mb/s 0.78km
100kb/s
1.49km
1
Range
22Constraints on Coverage
- downlink efficiency (bps/Hz/site)
- higher frequency more sites
- higher data rate more sites
3 Sector base station at 25m to outdoor PC card
Data Rate
Site density
100Mb/s 0.21km
50
10Mb/s 0.41km
15
3.6
1Mb/s 0.78km
100kb/s
1.49km
1
Range
23Constraints on Coverage
Fixed Mobile Chalk Cheese
- higher frequency more sites
- higher data rate more sites
3 Sector base station at 25m to outdoor PC card
Data Rate
Site density
100Mb/s 0.21km
50
10Mb/s 0.41km
15
3.6
1Mb/s 0.78km
100kb/s
1.49km
1
Range
24Beware Specmanship My System is faster than
Yours
- Modern technologies (EDGE, HSDPA, WiMax, Flarion)
ALL maximise use of the spectrum using flexible
allocation of resources and adaptive modulation
and coding. - Downlink throughput often shared by all users
- What data rate will it deliver?
- How long is a piece of string?
25Constraints on Coverage - Summary
- Modern technologies are beginning to approach
Shannon limit - A new technology is unlikely to
provide more than a marginal increase in range
for a given data rate. - The only way to get more coverage is to
- Transmit more power
- Transmit data slower
- Use bigger/higher antennas
- Use a lower frequency
- Get someone else to pass on a message
- Uplink transmit power likely to be the limiting
factor in range - Downlink transmit power and peak data rate
determine downlink range. Peak data rate then
needs to be shared between users
26Mobility vs. Speed
User Data Rate
Broadband
Narrowband
High speed
M O B I L I Y
Low speed
Level of mobility
Pedestrian
Nomadic
Indoor
Stationary
1
Mbps
0,1
10
Speed
27Mobility vs. Speed
- Cellular technologies become more and more
broadband - (HSDPA, HSUPA)
- Alternative wireless technologies become
- more and more mobile
- (WiMAX, Flash-OFDM, 802.20)
- Several technologies compete for mobile
Broadband - HSDPA is the most promising candidate
28Technology Landscape
NEXT Ad-hoc Mesh Networks
29Wireless broadband the landscape
802.16-2004 (fixed WiMax)
802.16e (mobile WiMax)
Alvarion Navini Aperto Adaptix
Flarion / Qualcomm ArrayComm
Proprietary, but aspiring to WiMax certification
and eventually 802.16e
Mobile broadband
HSDPA
TD-CDMA/FDD IPWireless
Fixed wireless broadband
Mesh networks (mostly based on 802.11) SkyPilot Be
lAir Nortel WMN IWICS
30Network Futures
31HSDPA Goals
- Efficient data traffic delivery mechanism that is
fully compatible with the current 3GPP system - HSDPA coverage is as good as UTRAN Rel99 No
need for new sites - Voice and data on the same carrier No need for
extra spectrum to deploy - Utilises current Network Infrastructure -
Software upgrade - Full mobility
- Improves spectral efficiency of the Rel99 system
about 2-3 times for packet data services - Significantly higher throughput and lower latency
offers peak data rate of up to 14.4Mb/s (Practice
1 2 Mb/s) - Specification also supports data rate as high as
384kbps in the uplink - Requires new Terminals
When ???
32HSUPA Goals
- Once again only a software upgrade on the Network
- Full mobility
- Improves spectral efficiency of the Rel99 system
in the upload - Significantly higher uplink throughput and lower
latency - Offers peak data rate of up to 5.76Mb/s, lt 100ms
- New Terminals
- Availability 2007?
33Network Futures
34Fixed WiMax Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Allocations available in the 3.5 5.8GHz bands
- Needs more cells than 3G
- high frequencies make migration to full mobile
service problematic. - Good solution for areas where DSL cant reach,
but shear volume of data traffic makes it hard to
compete for the heaviest internet households. - Possible backhaul technology for WLAN public
access points and pico-cells, but range and
capacity restricts use as a base station backhaul
solution. - Intel remain bullish on its capabilities
- Intel CEO view better than DSL (50 100Mb/s).
- Our view peak rates lt10.5Mb/s - need MIMO or
other techniques to improve it
Intel adds napa to Centrino roadmap
35WiMax 802.16e (Mobile Wireless Access)
- There are no WiMax products available today
- Commercial products based on the superseded
802.16a are not WIMAX certified - These products are all focused on fixed wireless
access deployments - Site count required for mobile wireless is far
greater than fixed - Laws of physics have not changed, despite press
speculation - For 802.16e to offer comparable mobile service,
similar densities as 3G needed - Too early to know how 802.16e will perform.
- Simulations in a multi-cell deployment urgently
needed - Handover ??
- 802.16 includes variety of modes and intended
applications - FDD and TDD, licensed and unlicensed spectrum,
massive number of options - 70 Mbps capability and gt30 km range is true for
only one mode not mobile! - Historical focus on fixed wireless systems and
wireless backhaul - The only completed standard applies to fixed
wireless access systems - The 802.16e standard for mobility support is
incomplete in many important areas
36WiMax 802.16e (Mobile Wireless Access)
- Lack of detailed simulation or test results due
to the standards not being finished - Early results suggest that 802.16e may have a
small increase in spectrum efficiency compared to
HSDPA - The exact performance figures for mobile WiMAX
cannot be determined yet! - Will only be possible once standard is complete
and a WiMAX 802.16e profile has been selected - Earliest 802.16e deployment likely to be 2007
37Hype is Fading but Backers are Strong
2005 Strong Backers
2004 - hype
Wait and See
- Intels inclusion in Centrino makes WiMax mobile
credible.
2005 set back
Competition in US from IPWireless?
38Network Futures
39Discontinuity in radio access technology
Tomorrow?
Today
Uplink evolution is not so clear!!
40Flarions Flash-OFDM (Qualcomm)
- Overview
- Fully mobile technology with 7 years development
effort - Requires 2 x 1.25 MHz
- Successful Vodafone field trial
- Peak rates 2.7Mbps DL, 0.8 UL
- Aggregate 1.8Mbps DL, 0.4 UL
- lt40 ms round trip time (latency)
- Maturity
- No commercial deployments
- Infrastructure available from Flarion, Siemens
and Nortel - Flarion PCMCIA card
Excellent, but handover not as impressive..!
No service concept
41Network Futures
42Mobile TV - which technology?
- HSDPA effective for unicast of video clips and
expansion of handset memory will allow non-real
time viewing of off-peak download - Serious adoption of 3G MobileTV will cause
capacity problems then broadcast technologies
will be needed
- MBMS is more cost effective than streaming
LiveTV, but is limited to 4 concurrent TV
channels - We can expect to see mobile broadcast
technologies rolled-out in Europe quite soon
Channel equivalents (per cell)
MBMS, 200kbit/ch
4
HSDPA, 200kbit/ch
3G, 200kbit/ch
1
5 users 3G capacitylimit
Concurrent viewers/cell
20 users 3G capacitylimit
Assuming a 3G carrier used only for MBMS
43UMA (Unlicensed Mobile Access)
- Provides Access to GSM/GPRS services over
alternative (potentially any) access methods
current focus on WLAN targetted for Release 7. - Concept has the potential to be extended to 3GSM
- Provides tight coupling and re-use of GSM/GPRS
core network. - Differs from existing 3GPP WLAN integration
(I-WLAN) effort as it mainly benefits CS services
(Voice, SMS). - UMA primarily suited for extending CS into
unlicensed spectrum - I-WLAN primarily suited for extending broadband
packet services into unlicensed spectrum - BT utilising UMA for its Bluephone product.
- Launch has been delayed whilst they wait for
commercial UMA solution.
44Mesh Networks Cellular Topology
- Each node communicates only with closest base
station. - Base stations connected through high-capacity
wires or optical fibers. - Base stations do most of the work.
- Not a truly wireless network (only last hop is
wireless) !
45Mesh Networks Ad-Hoc Topology
- No base stations, but nodes can talk to each
other. - Nodes have to get organized without the help
of base stations. This is a much more
challenging problem! - A truly wireless network!
- Another way to think about it a wireless
internet.
46Why Ad-Hoc Networks?
- They can be build very fast. No need to
establish wired connections. - They are very resilient. No single point of
failure, such as a base station. - They are spectrally more efficient than
cellular networks. Every node can communicate
with any other node, so nodes can make better use
of the channel. - Placing wires may be impossible, prohibitively
expensive, or just not necessary. - No need for operators.
-
47Summary
- HSDPA / HSUPA provides best option for Mobile
Wireless Broadband in the Short and Medium Term - WiMax well suited to Fixed Wireless Broadband
- 802.16e not ready and is limited in Mobile
Capability more Nomadic - OFDM is the future for both Fixed and Mobile
Networks 3 x W-CDMA - Watch Qualcomm
- UMA and Ad-Hoc Networks holds great promise
48Questions
- Jannie van Zyl
- jannie_at_vodacom.co.za
- Vodacom3G
49Thank You