Title: War and Peace
1War and Peace
- Introduction to Worldwide Weapons Control
- By Pete Riley
Titan II nuclear missile in its silo
2The Cold WarHistory
- The Cold War began after World War Two. The
main enemies were the United States and the
Soviet Union. The Cold war got its name because
both sides were afraid of fighting each other
directly. In such a "hot war," nuclear weapons
might destroy everything. So, instead, they
fought each other indirectly. They supported
conflicts in different parts of the world. They
also used words as weapons. They threatened and
denounced each other. Or they tried to make each
other look foolish.
3- The United States and the Soviet Union were
the only two superpowers following the Second
World War. The fact that, by the 1950s, each
possessed nuclear weapons and the means of
delivering such weapons on their enemies, added a
dangerous aspect to the Cold War. The Cold War
world was separated into three groups. The United
States led the West. This group included
countries with democratic political systems. The
Soviet Union led the East. This group included
countries with communist political systems. The
non-aligned group included countries that did not
want to be tied to either the West or the East.
4- As World War II neared its conclusion, the
future of Eastern Europe became a point of
contention between the Soviet Union and its
Western allies. The Soviet Union had been invaded
via Eastern Europe in both the First and Second
World Wars. In both conflicts, some of the
nations of Eastern Europe had participated in
those invasions. Both Wars had devastated the
Soviet Union. An estimated twenty-five million
Russians were killed during the Second World War.
The Soviet Union was determined to install
"friendly" regimes throughout Eastern Europe
following the War. The strategic goal was to
protect its European borders from future
invasions. Since the Soviet Union was a communist
state, the Soviet government preferred to install
communist regimes throughout Eastern Europe. The
Red Army was liberating the nations of Eastern
Europe and therefore, the Soviet Union was in a
position to influence the type of governments
that would emerge following the War.
5(No Transcript)
6- The cold war began because of this struggle for
control of the politics of these nations. By
1948, pro-Soviet regimes were in power in Poland,
Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Czechoslovakia. - The Western democracies, led by the United
States, were determined to stop the spread of
communism and Soviet power.
7- While not being able to stop the Soviets in
Eastern Europe, the U.S. and Britain were
determined to prevent communist regimes from
achieving power in Western Europe. During the
Second World War, communists parties throughout
Western Europe, had gained popularity in their
resistance to Nazi occupation. There was a real
possibility the communist parties would be
elected in both France and Italy.
8- Harry Truman was the first American president to
fight the Cold War. He used several policies. One
was the Truman Doctrine. This was a plan to give
money and military aid to countries threatened by
communism. The Truman Doctrine effectively
stopped communists from taking control of Greece
and Turkey. Another policy was the Marshall Plan,
which provided financial and economic assistance
to the nations of Western Europe. This
strengthened the economies and governments of
countries in western Europe, and as the economies
of Western Europe improved, the popularity of
communist parties declined.
9- The United States also led the formation of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 1949. NATO
was a joint military group. Its purpose was to
defend against Soviet forces in Europe (or, as
the saying went, "to keep Russia out, America in
and Germany down). The first members of NATO
were Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France,
Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
Portugal, and the United States. The Soviet Union
and its east European allies formed their own
joint military group -- the Warsaw Pact -- six
years later.
10- Cold War tensions increased, then eased, then
increased again over the years. The changes came
as both sides actively tried to influence
political and economic developments around the
world. For example, the Soviet Union provided
military, economic, and technical aid to
communist governments in Asia. The United States
then helped eight Asian nations fight communism
by establishing the Southeast Asia Treaty
Organization. In the mid 1950s, the United States
began sending military advisers to help South
Vietnam defend itself against communist North
Vietnam. That aid would later expand into a long
and bloody period of American involvement in
Vietnam.
11A sign in Russian, English, and French near the
Berlin Wall warned "You are leaving the American
sector." The east side of Berlin can be seen over
the top of the wall.
- Tens of thousands of East Germans had fled to the
west. East Germany's communist government decided
to stop them. It built a wall separating the
eastern and western parts of the city of Berlin.
Guards shot at anyone who tried to flee by
climbing over.
12- During Kennedy's second year in office, American
intelligence reports discovered Soviet missiles
in Cuba. The Soviet Union denied they were there.
American photographs proved they were. The Cuban
Missile Crisis easily could have resulted in a
nuclear war. But it ended after a week.
Khruschchev agreed to remove the missiles if the
United States agreed not to interfere in Cuba. - The Berlin Blockade and the Cuban Missile Crisis
were major confrontations of the cold war
13- Some progress was made in easing Cold War
tensions when Kennedy was president. In 1963, the
two sides reached a major arms control agreement.
They agreed to ban tests of nuclear weapons above
ground, under water, and in space. - Relations between east and west also improved
when Richard Nixon was president. He and Leonid
Brezhnev met several times. They reached several
arms control agreements. One reduced the number
of missiles used to shoot down enemy nuclear
weapons. It also banned the testing and
deployment of long-distance missiles for five
years.
14Key Treaties in nuclear Disarmament
- Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT) - 1963 Prohibited
all testing of nuclear weapons except
underground. - Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) - signed
1968, into force 1970 An international treaty
(currently with 189 member states) to limit the
spread of nuclear weapons. The treaty has three
main pillars nonproliferation, disarmament, and
the right to peacefully use nuclear technology.
15World map with nuclear weapons development status
represented by color. Five "nuclear
weapons states" from the NPT (red) Other
states known to possess nuclear weapons
(orange) States formerly possessing nuclear
weapons (purple) States suspected of being
in the process of developing nuclear weapons
and/or nuclear programs (yellow) States
which at one point had nuclear weapons and/or
nuclear weapons research programs
(blue) States that possess nuclear weapons,
but have not widely adopted them (pink)
16Key Treaties cont.
- Interim Agreement on Offensive Arms (SALT I) -
1972 The Soviet Union and the United States
agreed to a freeze in the number of
intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and
submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs)
that they would deploy. - Anti-ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) - 1972 The
United States ans Soviet Union could deploy ABM
interceptors at two sites, each with up to 100
ground-based launchers for ABM interceptor
missiles. In a 1974 Protocol, the US and Soviet
Union agreed to only deploy an ABM system to one
site. - Strategic Arms Limitation Treat (SALT II) - 1979
Replacing SALT I, SALT II limited both the Soviet
Union and the United States to an equal number of
ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and heavy
bombers. Also placed limits on Multiple
Independent Reentry Vehicles (MIRVS).
17Nuclear warhead stockpiles of the United States
and the Soviet Union/Russia, 1945-2006.
18Key Treaties cont.
- Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) -
1987 Created a global ban on short- and
long-range nuclear weapons systems, as well as an
intrusive verification regime. - Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) -
signed 1991, ratified 1994 Limited long-range
nuclear forces in the United States and the newly
independent states of the former Soviet Union to
6,000 attributed warheads on 1,600 ballistic
missiles and bombers. - Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II (START II) -
signed 1993, never put into force Signed in 1993
but never entered into force, START II was a
bilateral agreement between the U.S. and Russia
which attempted to commit each side to deploy no
more than 3,000 to 3,500 warheads by December
2007 and also included a prohibition against
deploying multiple independent reentry vehicles
(MIRVs) on intercontinental ballistic missiles
(ICBMs)
19Key Treaties cont.
- Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT or
Moscow Treaty) - signed 2002, into force 2003 A
very loose treaty that is often criticized by
arms control advocates for its ambiguity and lack
of depth, Russia and the United States agreed to
reduce their "strategic nuclear warheads" (a term
that remain undefined in the treaty) to between
1,700 and 2,200 by 2012. - Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) - signed
1996, not yet in force The CTBT is an
international treaty (currently with 177 state
signatures) that bans all nuclear explosions in
all environments. While the treaty is not in
force, Russia has not tested a nuclear weapons
since 1990 and the United States has not since
1992.
20Rogue States
- While the vast majority of states have adhered to
the stipulations of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, a few states have either refused to sign
the treaty or have pursued nuclear weapons
programs while not being members of the treaty.
The United States and the global community at
large view the pursuit of nuclear weapons by
these states as a threat to nonproliferation and
world peace, and therefore seek policies to
discourage the spread of nuclear weapons to these
"rogue states". - There are three known nuclear powers outside NPT
- Indian Nuclear Weapons - 70-120 active warheads
- Pakistani Nuclear Weapons - 30-80 active
warheads - North Korean Nuclear Weapons - 1-10 active
warheads
21Rogue States
- Undeclared nuclear weapons states outside NPT
- Israeli Nuclear Weapons - 75-200 active
warheads -
- Former Nuclear Weapons States
- South African Nuclear Weapons
- Non-Nuclear Weapons States who have been
suspected of having nuclear weapons programs - Iran Nuclear Weapons Program
- Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program
- Libyan Nuclear Weapons Program
22Indias Nuclear Program
- After 24 years without testing India resumed
nuclear testing with a series of nuclear
explosions known as "Operation Shatki." Prime
Minister Vajpayee authorized the tests on April
8, 1998, two days after the Ghauri missile
test-firing in Pakistan. - On May 11, 1998, India tested three devices at
the Pokhran underground testing site, followed by
two more tests on May 13, 1998. The nuclear tests
carried out at 345 pm on May 11th were claimed
by the Indian government to be a simultaneous
detonation of three different devices - a fission
device with a yield of about 12 kilotons (KT), a
thermonuclear device with a yield of about 43 KT,
and a sub-kiloton device. The two tests carried
out at 1221 pm on May 13th were also detonated
simultaneously with reported yields in the range
of 0.2 to 0.6 KT. - However, there is some controversy about these
claims. Based on seismic data, U.S. government
sources and independent experts estimated the
yield of the so-called thermonuclear test in the
range of 12-25 kilotons, as opposed to the 43-60
kiloton yield claimed by India. This lower yield
raised skepticism about India's claims to have
detonated a thermonuclear device. - Observers initially suggested that the test could
have been a boosted fission device, rather than a
true multi-stage thermonuclear device. By late
1998 analysts at Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory had concluded that the India had
attempted to detonate a thermonuclear device, but
that the second stage of the two-stage bomb
failed to ignite as planned.
23(No Transcript)
24Pakistan Nuclear Program
- India's 1974 testing of a nuclear "device" gave
Pakistan's nuclear program new momentum. Through
the late 1970s, Pakistan's program acquired
sensitive uranium enrichment technology and
expertise. The 1975 arrival of Dr. Abdul Qadeer
Khan considerably advanced these efforts. Dr.
Khan is a German-trained metallurgist who brought
with him knowledge of gas centrifuge technologies
that he had acquired through his position at the
classified URENCO uranium enrichment plant in the
Netherlands. Dr. Khan also reportedly brought
with him stolen uranium enrichment technologies
from Europe. He was put in charge of building,
equipping and operating Pakistan's Kahuta
facility, which was established in 1976. Under
Khan's direction, Pakistan employed an extensive
clandestine network in order to obtain the
necessary materials and technology for its
developing uranium enrichment capabilities.
25- On May 28, 1998 Pakistan announced that it had
successfully conducted five nuclear tests. The
Pakistani Atomic Energy Commission reported that
the five nuclear tests conducted on May 28
generated a seismic signal of 5.0 on the Richter
scale, with a total yield of up to 40 KT
(equivalent TNT). Dr. A.Q. Khan claimed that one
device was a boosted fission device and that the
other four were sub-kiloton nuclear devices. - On May 30, 1998 Pakistan tested one more nuclear
warhead with a reported yield of 12 kilotons. The
tests were conducted at Balochistan, bringing the
total number of claimed tests to six. It has also
been claimed by Pakistani sources that at least
one additional device, initially planned for
detonation on 30 May 1998, remained emplaced
underground ready for detonation. - Pakistani claims concerning the number and yields
of their underground tests cannot be
independently confirmed by seismic means, and
several sources, such as the Southern Arizona
Seismic Observatory have reported lower yields
than those claimed by Pakistan. Indian sources
have also suggested that as few as two weapons
were actually detonated, each with yields
considerably lower than claimed by Pakistan.
However, seismic data showed at least two and
possibly a third, much smaller, test in the
initial round of tests at the Ras Koh range. The
single test on 30 May provided a clear seismic
signal.
26(No Transcript)
27North Korea Nuclear Program
- Current Status
- North Korea conducted an underground nuclear
explosive test on October 9, 2006. The estimated
yield of the test was less than one kiloton. - In a roundtable discussion with the United States
and China in Beijing on April 24, 2003, North
Korean officials admitted for the first time that
they possessed nuclear weapons. Furthermore,
North Korean officials claim to have reprocessed
spent fuel rods and have threatened to begin
exporting nuclear materials unless the United
States agrees to one-on-one talks with North
Korea.
28- Tensions between the United States and North
Korea have been running especially high since, in
early October of 2002, Assistant Secretary of
State James Kelly informed North Korean officials
that the United States was aware that North Korea
had a program underway to enrich uranium for use
in nuclear weapons. Initially North Korea denied
this, but later confirmed the US claim. In
confirming that they had an active nuclear
weapons program, they also declared the Agreed
Framework nullified. - The Agreed Framework signed by the United States
and North Korea on October 21, 1994 in Geneva
agreed that -
- North Korea would freeze its existing nuclear
program and agree to enhanced International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards - Both sides would cooperate to replace the
D.P.R.K.'s graphite-moderated reactors for
related facilities with light-water (LWR) power
plants. - Both countries would move toward full
normalization of political and economic
relations. - Both sides will work together for peace and
security on a nuclear-free Korean peninsula. - And that both sides would work to strengthen
the international nuclear non-proliferation
regime.
29- Prior to the establishment of the Agreed
Framework, intelligence sources believed that
North Korea could have extracted plutonium from
their reactors for use in nuclear weapons
perhaps enough for one or two nuclear weapons. - Nevertheless, it has remained unclear whether
North Korea had actually produced nuclear weapons
due to difficulties in developing detonation
devices.
Seismic record of explosion from digital station
Vladivostok, Russia
30U.S. - India Nuclear Pact
- The accord, not yet sealed this year between the
Bush administration and Mr. Singhs government,
would allow India to buy nuclear fuel and
technology from the world market for its civilian
energy program. India has been prohibited from
doing so for three decades, since it tested its
own nuclear weapons. - The agreement lays out a framework for peaceful
nuclear cooperation that would eventually allow
trade in nuclear reactors, technology and fuel
between the two nations. It permits India to
reprocess nuclear fuel and opens the way for the
United States to become a "reliable" supplier for
India's energy program.
31- The deal is close to collapse after the Indian
prime minister told President Bush on 10/15 that
"certain difficulties" will prevent India from
moving forward on the pact for the foreseeable
future. - The main obstacle does not involve the specific
terms of the agreement but rather India's
internal politics, including fears from leftist
parties that India is moving too close to the
United States, according to officials and experts
familiar with the deal. - The nuclear pact has also encountered resistance
in the United States, where many in Congress
considered it a sweetheart deal for India and
threatened to try to scuttle it. Critics said the
agreement sets a bad example because India would
win access to U.S. technology without complying
with the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which permits
cooperation on nuclear energy only when countries
pledge not to develop nuclear weapons.
32North Korea Nuclear Deal
- North Korea agreed Tuesday 10/30 to accept half
of the economic aid it has been promised for
disabling its nuclear reactor in energy-related
equipment and other materials, a South Korean
official said. - The North, which has already received 50,000 tons
of oil in return for shutting down the reactor in
July, will still be given about 450,000 tons in
fuel oil
North Korea's top nuclear negotiator Kim Kye Gwan
33- On Monday, North Korea presented a list of
hundreds of alternative items mostly steel
products for renovating its outdated power plants
at the start of the meeting at the Korean
border village of Panmunjom, located in the
middle of the Demilitarized Zone that divides
peninsula. - The North will also receive 50,000 tons of oil
every month - Japan's Kyodo News agency reported Tuesday
evening that a tanker carrying the first shipment
of heavy fuel oil, supplied by the United States,
had arrived in North Korea.
34Israel Silent on Reports of Bombing Within Syria
- JERUSALEM, Oct. 14 Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice and Israeli officials declined
Sunday to confirm or deny a report that an
Israeli Air Force strike against Syria last month
had bombed a partly constructed nuclear reactor
apparently of North Korean design.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice meeting
Sunday with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel
at his office in Jerusalem.
35Hiroshima and Nagasaki
- Little Boy took 57 seconds to fall from the
aircraft to the predetermined detonation height
about 600 meters (2,000 ft) above the city. It
created a blast equivalent to about 13 kilotons
of TNT.
The mushroom cloud over Hiroshima after the
dropping of Little Boy
36- Fat Man was dropped over the city's industrial
valley, and 43 seconds later it exploded 469
meters (1,540 ft) above the ground exactly
halfway between the Mitsubishi Steel and Arms
Works in the south and the Mitsubishi-Urakami
Ordnance Works (Torpedo Works) in the north. - The resulting explosion had a blast yield
equivalent to 21 kilotons of TNT. The explosion
generated heat estimated at 7000 degrees
Fahrenheit and winds that were estimated at 624
mph.
Nagasaki before and after bombing
The Fat Man mushroom cloud resulting from the
nuclear explosion over Nagasaki rises 18 km (11
mi, 60,000 ft) into the air from the hypocenter.
37Iran hands IAEA nuclear blueprints
- Just today, Iran has met a key demand of the U.N.
nuclear agency, handing over long-sought
blueprints showing how to mold uranium metal into
the shape of warheads, diplomats said. - Iran's decision to release the documents, which
were seen by U.N. inspectors two years ago, was
seen as a concession designed to head off the
threat of new U.N. sanctions. - Both the IAEA and other experts have categorized
the instructions outlined in the blueprints as
having no value outside of a nuclear weapons
program.
38An overview of a conference hall at the beginning
of an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
board of governors meeting in Vienna September
10, 2007. The U.N. nuclear watchdog is likely to
report this week that Iran has improved
cooperation with an inquiry over its atomic work
but diplomats say it may not resolve any key
questions over the program. (Herwig
Prammer/Reuters)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,arrives to
meet with China's Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi,
unseen, in Tehran, Iran Tuesday Nov. 13, 2007.
(AP Photo/Hasan Sarbakhshian)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right,
talks with China's Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi,
left, during an official meeting in Tehran, Iran
Tuesday Nov. 13, 2007. An unidentified Chinese
translator seen in center. Iran, seeking to
bolster its air defenses amid rising tensions
over its nuclear program, is likely to turn to
Russia and China for the warplanes needed to
replace its obsolete U.S. jets, analysts say. (AP
Photo/Hasan Sarbakhshian)
39Other countries respond to Iran
- Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown delivers
his keynote speech at the Lord Mayor's Banquet at
the Guildhall in central London, Monday, Nov. 12,
2007. Prime Minister Brown pledged to press for
tough new sanctions on Iran's oil and natural gas
industries Monday, outlining an assertive
approach to foreign policy and stressing close
ties to the United States. Brown warned Tehran
that unless pending reports on its contested
nuclear program show signs of progress, he will
push the European Union and United Nations for
tighter sanctions. 'Iran should be in no doubt
about the seriousness of our purpose,' Brown told
the annual Lord Mayor's banquet. (AP Photo/Toby
Melville/pool)
40Other countries respond to Iran
- French President Nicolas Sarkozy touches German
Chancellor Angela Merkel's shoulder as they
arrive to address a joint press conference at the
Chancellery in Berlin. Sarkozy and Merkel warned
Monday more sanctions may be necessary to
persuade Iran to suspend nuclear work and opened
the possibility of reducing trade ties with
Tehran.(AFP/Eric Feferberg)
41US warships sail through the Gulf. Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice denied Sunday that the
United States was bent on war with Iran and
renewed an offer of reconciliation talks if the
Islamic republic renounces its nuclear
drive.(AFP/US Navy/File)
An F-18 warplane takes off from the USS John C.
Stennis aircraft carrier which is stationed in
the Gulf.
42- A cameraman films inside the Isfahan Uranium
Conversion Facilities, 420 kms south of Tehran,
February 2007.
Machines produce uranium hexafluoride (UF6) at
the uranium conversion facilities in Isfahan,
Iran.
43- US President George W. Bush speaks during a joint
press conference with German Chancellor Angela
Merkel outside his office on his ranch in
Crawford, Texas. Bush and Merkel agreed Saturday
to pursue a diplomatic end to the Iran nuclear
standoff as they worked on a common strategy
towards a defiant Tehran.(AFP/Jim Watson)
44Conclusion
- Since the discovery of nuclear energy, and
after the dropping of the two atomic bombs on
Japan to end World War II, it has become apparent
that there is a necessity for ways of dealing
with nuclear weapons. Treaties have been drafted
and some signed, but if countries are not to
follow the policies of these treaties, we are in
just as dangerous of place as without them. The
US and Russia are the nuclear giants and for the
smaller countries it seems a strategic error to
sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, continuing to
leave them as a militarily inferior nation.
International talks must continue with the
outcome being fair to all countries.