Title: Plant Sciences Libraries 2'0
1Plant Sciences Libraries 2.0
- Roger Mills
SLA Seattle 2008
2Plant Sciences Libraries 2.0
3Its an ALFIE question
- What's it all about, Alfie? Is it just for the
moment we live? What's it all about when you
sort it out, Alfie?
4Its an ALFIE library
- ALFIE
- A Library For Internet Explorers
- other browsers are available
5Its all online, stupid
- "As a national library, the print collection is
core to researchers and the agricultural history
of the nation. It is this reduction of 3,000,000
for the print collections that is of immediate
concern. In FY 2007, NAL document delivery
services filled 29,000 requests from the NAL
collection for materials which were available in
print-only--not available electronically. In FY
2009, such requests for print-only materials
would not be filled. - From letter by the USAIN Executive Council on
behalf of the U.S. agricultural information
community to the Chairwoman, House Appropriations
Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development,
Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies - http//www.usain.org/budget20proposal20de20laur
o.pdf
6- http//www.3dnworld.com/users/1/images/UltimateEa
rth.jpg
7This is a library
- http//www.3dnworld.com/users/1/images/UltimateEa
rth.jpg
8What is a library?- an information
storetake-away- an information
systemeat-in
- http//www.3dnworld.com/users/1/images/UltimateEa
rth.jpg
9(No Transcript)
10All the worlds a library
11All the worlds a library
- And all the men and women merely librarians
- They have their exits and their entrances
12All the worlds a library
- In Dr Who spoilers
- The librarians daughter is dying he creates a
virtual world for her and saves her and it on the
librarys computer - The library books contain spores from the forests
the paper came from - The spores germinate into flesh-eating shadows
- The shadows eat the librarians, but the computer
saves them all to disk first - By connecting herself to the computer, the
doctors companion generates enough energy to
recreate the saved librarians and dispel the
shadows, but dies in the process - But she has also been saved and is thus able to
live on in virtual reality (heaven?)
13Thinking of putting your library on Second Life?
- Take care.
- What is the nature of reality?
- What is it were trying to preserve?
- Why?
- Whats the best way of doing it?
14Its a human thing
- Why should we only toil, the roof and crown of
things..
15How do other species manage?
16How do other species manage?
17How do other species manage?
18Life on Mars
- The Phoenix Mars Lander sits on the surface of
Mars in an artist's concept from NASA (NASA) - Store and transmit
- http//www.abc.net.au/reslib/200805/r253674_104619
3.jpg
19Springwatch
20What is information?
- Has it changed?
- The way we discover / create / manage it has
- Has it left the library / librarian behind?
21ncbi
22What is publication?
- Data, images etc are publication objects in their
own right - How do we store them, access them, preserve them,
manage them? - Who does it?
23What is a Plant Sciences Library?
- Like NCBI/NLM or a different world?
- A pivot?
- Or a point of view?
24A focussed view of an integrated collection
- Different tools for different views
- Are we shop-keepers or manufacturers?
25Portals
26OFIS
Services
27IUFRO
Networks
28Bleeding edge
- Binoculars (sharp edge) or searchlight (fading
off at edges)? - Connecting detailed views is the challenge
- ttp//www.turbophoto.com/Free-Stock-Images/Images/
Light20Beam.jp
http//www.turbophoto.com/Free-Stock-Images/Images
/Light20Beam.jpg
29Leaders or led?
- Bleeding edges
- dont bleed for ever
- But people always want beer
http//www.cartoonstock.com/directory/c/cutting_ed
ge.asp
30What is Library 2.0?
- http//www.telegraph.co.uk/money/graphics/2008/06/
04/calex04.gif - DIY
31The end of civilisation?
- Was it for this I wakend thy young mind? (Robert
Southey, History) - Was it for this the clay grew tall? (Wilfred
Owen. Futility) - We are degrading ourselves / our students
32Encyclopaedia Britannica Goes -- Gasp! -- Wiki
- Long a standard reference source for scholarship,
largely because of its tightly controlled
editing, the Encyclopaedia Britannica announced
this week it was throwing open its
elegantly-bound covers to the masses.It will
allow the user community (in the words of the
encyclopedias blog) to contribute their own
articles, which will be clearly marked and run
alongside the edited reference pieces.At
Britannica, readers and users will also be
invited into an online community where they can
work and publish at Britannicas site under their
own names, the encyclopedias blog explains.But
its not a complete free-for-all. The voice of
Britannica adds that the core encyclopedia itself
will continue to be edited according to the most
rigorous standards and will bear the imprimatur
Britannica checked to distinguish it from
material on the site for which Britannica editors
are not responsible. - Josh Fischman
- The Chronicle of Higher Education - Wired
Campus. June 6, 2008 http//chronicle.com/wiredca
mpus/article/3064/encyclopedia-britannica-goes-gas
p-wiki
33Library 2.0
- Is not didactic
- Is a toolkit
- Is enabling
- Is bidirectional and iterative
- Is a strategy for constant change while promoting
a participatory role for library users (Michael
Casey) - Is about innovation, people, community building
341976
Building bridges
1981
www.reichsbruecke.net/geschichte_e.php
35Beta is forever
- Darwinism?
- Evolution or extinction
- The choice is ours
36Where do we start and end?
- In the past, the purchasing decisions of
university librarians made it all too easy for
students to find good material and avoid the bad.
Now they have to learn how to evaluate sources
for themselves, looking at issues of provenance,
date, reputation, peer review and so on. It is
one of the crucial new roles for librarians to
help them Deborah Shorley, Imperial - and to help them undo what they've learnt
though Google and social-networking sites Jane
Savidge, Univ of Surrey - Hits and Misses, THE, 5 June 08,
http//www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?se
ctioncode26storycode402225
37From responses to Hits and Misses,THE,5 June 08
- Bill in DC 10 June, 2008 As a high school
teacher, I get the feeling that the problem
discussed here -- low student understand of the
nature of viable research -- is not new. - What we might call the googled bibliography just
makes it a great deal easier to figure out if a
given student understands the nature of
peer-reviewed and reputable sources. - Once, all students, finding no information except
in published books, had all their sources
filtered by the purchasing librarian. The result
every source passed muster. Now, they can find
sources that are little better than the ramblings
of the insane, since the librarians don't control
their access to data. Result many sources are
cited that are disreputable. - I doubt that the average citizen fifty years ago
had much better understanding it's just that
we're better able to detect it, since new
technology gives students more opportunity to
display their imperfections. - I take it as an opportunity, not a problem
better detectors lead to better realities, even
if we have to climb the epistemic hill of our
discovery of the severity of the problem.
38Just do it
- Is the choice ours?
- Over to you!
39Plant Sciences Library 2.0
- Jarmo Saarikko
- Finnish Forest Research Institute Metla
- Head of Information Service (ex Library)
40Plant Sciences Library 2.0
- Smaller special libraries are rapidly
disappearing - - often amalgamated to larger units
41Plant Sciences Library 2.0
- What makes this library to be a second level
library? - Collections? Services? Staff?
42Library 2.0
- Special collections - are there any left?
- Plant sciences staff how to find them?
- Forestry patrons where do they go to now?
- Are there any dedicated services needed?
- What makes a special library special?
- Do you find the special if you need it?
43Science 2.0
- Science ? E-science ? Science 2.0
- Interdisciplinarity
- How can the Web 2.0 technologies
- help patrons to receive the library services they
need in the new science environment - help librarians and information specialists to
provide their expertise is of use to their
patrons - in both the traditional and the new innovative
services
44Web 2.0 and Library 2.0
- All have access to the net
- Mobile access from anywhere they go
- Library as physical space may need a digital
or virtual equivalent where the roaming
patrons can visit - Should libraries reach out to the patrons?
- Library in a small and remote research unit?
- Services are changing
- Required expertise is changing
45Library 2.0 new tasks
- Many sessions cover these during SLA2008
- New tasks and roles for the science librarians
- Acquisitions, procurement ebooks, research
data - Digital asset management
- Digitization
- Knowledge organization and management
- Networking the libraries
46Library 2.0 - services
- New way of thinking web services
- Easiness of finding and locating information
- Possibility to modify network content
- for an individual or a group
- Participation of patrons in service production
- Using the existing metadata in the catalogs
- National investments
47Specialists in Library 2.0
- New roles in serving research teams and networks
- Facilitating new communication and networking
tools in research - Segmentation
- Searching and managing information
- Drilling in the scientific content
- graphs and images are now being indexed, and
datasets put available - From social networking sources
- Blogs, videos, podcasts, wikis, feeds,
slideshares - Syndication of information, mashups and remixing
- Re-designing services
- OPAC for Web 2.0 http//maisonbisson.com/blog/post
/11096 -
- Where are the physical shelved collections?
Are they becoming a curiosity instead of an asset?
48Patrons in Library 2.0
- Collaboration
- Enriching the library catalogs
- from information systems to participatory
systems - tagging
- reviews, comments, corrections of errors
- recommendations
- aquisition suggestions
- suggest additional reading from the collection
- collective reliability check evidence for and
against - Examples amazon.com (link), librarything.com
(link) - Collection management
- bringing in digital assets
49Non-patrons in Library 2.0
- Reasons for not using libraries
- Lack of time
- Services not known
- Services known but not interested
- Young males
- Competition of time
-
- Providing interesting services and marketing them
50Library of the future
- A study made in Helsinki 2008
- Task to civilize and to keep up-to-date
- Living library - central knot
- Content is the most important feature
- Library is an interesting place both
physically and virtually - Events continually
- Everyone knows what library has to offer
51Additional information
- Reference
- http//liswiki.org/wiki/Library_2.0
- http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_2.0
- Networks
- A ning social network for Library 2.0
http//library20.ning.com/ - Library 2.0 Reading List http//www.squidoo.com/l
ibrary20 - This lens is created by Jenny Levine and Michael
Stephens for the Library 2.0 course for the
American library Association - Has also definitions for Library 2.0
- Online articles on web 2.0 technologies
- http//www.techsource.ala.org/ltr/ (M.Boule)
- http//www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html
(J.M.Maness)