Cost Effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning as a Scheduling Option - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Cost Effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning as a Scheduling Option

Description:

LEEP-M.S.in LIS/ GSLIS. Scheduling option, not separate program ... Use of LEEP format to teach specialized courses to on campus. On load for all faculty ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: leig4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cost Effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning as a Scheduling Option


1
Cost Effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning as a
Scheduling Option
  • The Case of the University of Illinois Graduate
    School of Library and Information Science M.S.
    program
  • Leigh S. Estabrook

2
Introduction
  • LEEP-M.S.in LIS/ GSLIS
  • Scheduling option, not separate program
  • Fully integrated into school in dollars, faculty,
    students and support staff
  • Admittedly an historical accident

3
Background
  • Strong demand
  • Maldistribution of LIS Schools
  • Strong interest in rapidly changing field
  • Interest of working adults who cannot afford to
    become traditional graduate student
  • Market demand for more technologically literate
    students
  • University stake
  • interest in distance education
  • desire for model

4
GSLIS Faculty
  • Interest
  • Full involvement from start
  • Asserting LIS leadership--past and present
  • Overcoming state obstacles
  • Integrating technology
  • Alignment with field and trends
  • Willingness to take risks

5
Cost Model
  • Fee structure identical to other scheduling
    options
  • Depended on 70 out-of-state with 140 students
  • Use of LEEP format to teach specialized courses
    to on campus
  • On load for all faculty
  • High start up investment for faculty and
    technology staff

6
(No Transcript)
7
Benefits to students
  • Access to accredited, highly-ranked program
  • Increased earning potential
  • Opportunity for career change
  • Increased facility with technology
  • Involvement in full range of ancillary activities

8
Benefits to School
  • Faculty proficiency
  • Course offerings in new areas
  • Optimization of instruction
  • Enhanced on-campus technologies
  • Student retention
  • Valuable publicity
  • Budget increases to variety of areas

9
Reconsidering Cost-model
  • Potential increase in tuition income
  • Could pay premium to faculty or increase profit
  • Loss to School as a whole
  • Added cost of accounting
  • Question of viability as number of ALN programs
    in LIS increase

10
Unlikely to change model costs to School appear
to be much greater than dollar returns would
warrant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com