Aquifer Storage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Aquifer Storage

Description:

Recharge water must meet drinking-water standards ... Seepage systems, Injection wells. Recharge Method. Primarily drinking water. Primarily irrigation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: woo56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aquifer Storage


1
Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) andArtificial
Recharge (AR)
  • Donn Miller
  • Oregon Water Resources Department

2
Key Differences between AR ASR
3
Key Differences between AR ASR
4
Generalized Application Process for AR ASR
Pre-Application Conference arranged by WRD with
DHS, DEQ, DFW and applicant
Submit application supplemental reports to WRD
WRD issues authorization conditioned by all
agencies
Operation monitoring and reporting to agencies
Apply for additional authorization as needed
5
Oregon Experience with Groundwater Storage Case
Studies
6
Status of ASR AR in Oregon
  • Active ASR sites 11
  • Active AR sites 5

7
Oregon Experience Case Studies
8
County Line AR Umatilla/Morrow Counties
  • Canal recharge began in 1977
  • Recharges an average of 6,000 ac-ft/year
  • Augments Ordnance Critical Area gravel aquifer
    for irrigation
  • Source water Umatilla River

9
Salem ASR Marion County
  • The City began ASR in 1997
  • Stores up to 500 Million Gallons/year
  • Source Water North Santiam River
  • Columbia River Basalt aquifer

10
New Oregon Activities
  • OWSCI Oregon Water Supply and Conservation
    Initiative
  • Feasibility Studies Water Conservation, Reuse
    and Storage Grant Program
  • Research Umatilla Basin Groundwater Storage

11
Conclusions
  • Oregon has 2 administrative options ASR AR
  • There are 16 active Groundwater Storage sites
  • The State of Oregon is currently sponsoring 3
    Groundwater Storage Activities

www.wrd.state.or.us
12
Feasibility Considerations forAquifer Storage
Recovery (ASR) andArtificial Recharge (AR)
  • Tom Pattee
  • Oregon Department of Human Services

13
What Kinds of Questions Should Interested
Communities Ask?
  • What are our future water needs?
  • Is water available for underground storage?
  • Do we have a suitable hydrogeologic setting for
    underground storage?
  • Are the appropriate water rights in place?
  • What are the analysis and implementation costs?

14
Feasibility What are our future water needs?
  • How will population change affect need?

Percent Change
-4.5 to 0.1
0.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 8.5
8.6 to 15.0
15.0 to 39.5
The U.S. Census Bureau projects a population
increase of one million people in Oregon by 2030.
15
Feasibility What are our future water needs?
  • How will climate change effect water supply?
  • Planning community water system master plan

16
Feasibility Water Availability in Oregon
  • In general, there is more water available
    during the winter months than in summer months,
    when demand is highest.

17
Feasibility What Hydrogeologic Features
Influence Suitability?
  • Ability of the aquifer to accept water
  • Ability to retain water
  • Sufficient storage to reach economy of scale
  • Favorable aquifer boundary conditions

18
Feasibility Cost vs. Benefit
  • Costs are lower than for surface reservoirs
  • Few environmental impacts
  • Minimal land requirements
  • Lower construction costs

19
Feasibility Cost vs. Benefit
  • But nothing is free Must factor in costs of
  • Feasibility Study site characterization and
    monitoring
  • Water treatment filtration and disinfection
  • Infrastructure improvements pumping systems,
    pipes, wells
  • Ongoing maintenance and monitoring

20
Feasibility Infrastructure
  • Water treatment (esp. for ASR) and/or water
    quality monitoring equipment
  • Canals and pipelines to move water from source to
    recharge site
  • Monitoring wells upgradient and downgradient of
    recharge site

21
Feasibility Water Quality Concerns
  • Must meet water quality standards before
    recharge, during storage and at time of recovery
  • Source water and ambient groundwater must be
    compatible

22
Conclusions
  • Considerations for the feasibility of ASR and AR
    include
  • Water Needs
  • Water Availability for Storage
  • Suitable Hydrogeologic Setting
  • Water Rights
  • Costs of Analysis and Implementation

23
Feasibility Groundwater Quality Protection Rules
- Anti-degradation Policy
  • This DEQ policy emphasizes the prevention of
    groundwater pollution and control of waste
    discharges so that the highest possible
    groundwater quality is preserved.
  • New DEQ permitted facilities are not allowed to
    increase contaminants above background
    concentrations without a variance.

24
Feasibility Groundwater Quality Protection
  • AR Source water must meet water quality standards
    as specified in DEQs groundwater rules.
  • ASR Source water must meet drinking water
    standards specified by DHS rules.
  • Source water and ambient groundwater must be
    compatible.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com