Population Growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Population Growth

Description:

Population Growth – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: dbe68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Population Growth


1
Population Growth
  • The Data 1620 2,302
  • 1700 250,000
  • 1720 500,000
  • 1740 1,000,000
  • 1776 2.5 million
  • 1820 10 million
  • 1914 100 million
  • Today  293,238,779 (as of this morning)
  • Growth rates 17th century gt5 per year
  • 18th, 19th century 3 per year
  • 20th century lt 2, peak of 1.75 for the baby
    boomers

2
Birth Rates
  • Maximum birth rate 60 per 1,000 persons
  • 1800 55 per 1,000 persons
  • 1900 30 per 1,000 persons
  • Today gt 20 per 1,000 persons

3
Why were birth rates higher in the 19th century?
  • Lower median age
  • 15.9 in 1790
  • 19.4 in 1860
  • 34.0 today
  • Abundant land
  • Urban fertility rates were lower than rural
    fertility rates. Why?
  • Children are durable goods. Urban residents have
    more choices in consumption.
  • Children are investment goods. Children had a
    greater return on farms then they did in urban
    settings.

4
Why did birthrates decline?
  • Decrease in arable land increased the cost of
    bequests to children.
  • Increase in settled land led to an increase in
    capital gain from settled land. This lead to a
    decline in the number of children needed to
    provide for retirement.

5
Colonial Factors of Production
  • Land is in abundant supply.
  • Labor produces capital.
  • Labor thus is the binding constraint on colonial
    development.

6
Free Population and Indentured Servants
  • Free population comes for two reasons
  • Religious Freedom
  • Economic opportunity
  • Indentured Servants
  • Problem Labor supply exists in Europe, labor
    demand in North America. Who is to pay the high
    cost of passage?
  • Solution Indentured servants, who sell their
    labor for the right to passage. Contracts
    (indentures) were fixed before departure. The
    shipper then sold the contract upon arrival in
    North America. Hence, all the risk fell on the
    shipper.

7
Who were the indentured servants?
  • Historical view Social refuse.
  • David Galensons view
  • Majority are males (4 to 1)
  • Ages late teens, early twenties.
  • Hence, the most productive labor is leaving
    Europe. The European countries, however, bore
    all the cost of child rearing. In other words,
    this is best described as a muscle drain.
  • Literacy rates compared favorable to the rate in
    Britain.
  • Finally, indentured servants over time
    increasingly were
  • skilled labor, not unskilled labor.

8
How was the length of the contract determined?
  • Galensons view Competition led to the
    adjustment of the length of indentures so that
    the expected sale price was just equal to the
    cost of passage.

9
Another view of contracts
  • Farley Grubbs view
  • Price variation in Philadelphia suggests the
    efficient market hypothesis is not appropriate.
  • Theory Price f(sex, literacy, occupation)
  • Evidence Price is not a function of observable
    characteristics.
  • NOTE INSIGNIFICANCE CAN BE SIGNIFICANT
  • Why? Supply is in Europe, demand is in North
    America.
  • How well should a market separated by thousands
    of miles function?

10
The move to slavery
  • Three sources of labor Free, servants, slave
  • At low wages only free labor exists. As wages
    rise, indentured servants increasingly wish to
    come to America.
  • As wages rise to cover the cost of passage, labor
    eventually consists of only slaves.
  • As the cost of passage falls, slaves are easier
    to import and Europeans are less likely to sell
    their labor via the indentured contract. Hence,
    indentured servants disappear primarily due to
    improvements in shipping.

11
Redemptioners
  • Redemptioners - immigrants borrowed the cost of
    transportation and agreed to sell their labor
    upon arrival to pay off the debt.
  • Hence, labor assumed the risk of the contract,
    rather than the shipper.
  • Why would labor agree to a contract that shifted
    risk to themselves?
  • Choice of masters.
  • Allowed families to remain together.

12
A bit on slavery
  • Unlike indentured servants, slaves had no legal
    rights and were entirely subject to their owners.
  • Slave prices were higher than indentured
    servants. WHY?
  • Slavery was eliminated peacefully in the British
    empire, but not till after the American
    Revolution
  • Slavery will be discussed in detail later in the
    course.

13
Immigration
  • Source if Immigration
  • Irish and German 1840-1860
  • Central Europe, Italy, Russia 1900-1914
  • Cubans 1960s
  • Vietnamese, Soviet Jews 1970s
  • Push factors
  • Religious and civil repression
  • Poverty, Hunger, Lack of economic opportunity
  • Pull factors
  • Cheap land
  • High wages
  • Social equality (??)
  • Religious and civil freedom
  • Which factor dominates The research of Jeffrey
    Williamson (STUDENTS READ)

14
What did immigration mean for the U.S.?
  • Francis Walker (19th century economist,
    statistician, and president of MIT)
  • Maximum rate of population growth existed in the
    U.S.
  • Each European immigrant replaced a native
    American
  • Hence, immigration can be thought of as a cost to
    the U.S.
  •  Paul Uselding
  • Maximum rate of population never existed
  • Each immigrant represented a capital transfer,
    since the cost of raising the migrant was born by
    Europeans, not Americans. In other words, the
    human capital investment was made in Europe,
    American realized the gains from the investment.
  • By 1859, the additional capital formation from
    immigration represented 5 to 10 of GNP

15
More on immigrations impact
  •  Uselding and Larry Neal
  • From 1790-1912, additional capital stock from
    immigration equaled 10-20 of GNP
  • Robert Gallman
  • Noted that immigration was mostly urban. Hence
    the birth rate of native born Americans was
    higher than it would have been otherwise since
    the migration of Americans to the cities was less
    than what it would have been.

16
A bit more on slavery
  • The Slave Issue Why did Europeans settle in the
    North or West and not the South?
  • African immigration basically stopped in 1820
  • By 1860 99 of Africans in the U.S. were natives
  • Higher percentage of Africans were natives than
    Europeans
  • Slavery as an institution ended in the British
    Empire and the Northern United States.
  • Prior to Eli Whitneys cotton gin, cotton
    production was not possible on a large scale in
    the South. Gradually slavery was dying in the
    South also.
  • The growth of cotton led to a significant growth
    in slave labor. Did this impact the pattern of
    European migration?
  • Although Europeans may have had a greater
    distaste for slave labor, the attraction to the
    North was because jobs in manufacturing were more
    desirable and plentiful.

17
Background on Slaves
  • No legal rights
  • to marriage
  • to property
  • to children
  • increase in population comes only from native
    population after 1808. As noted, the vast
    majority of the African-American population was
    native born

18
The Civil War
  • Why fight the war? The argument over slavery.
  • Remember, cotton production was migrating to the
    West. Would slavery be allowed in the new
    Western territories?
  • Furthermore, who would compensate the South if
    slavery was declared illegal?
  • Note The North did not have an economic interest
    to end slavery.

19
Was the War Necessary?
  • Could slavery be abolished without war?
  • Federal government purchasing slaves immediately
  • Gradual freeing of slaves over time.
  • Was integration of society a goal of the
    abolitionists? In general, no.

20
The Cost of the War
  • Claudia Goldin and Frank Lewis estimate the
    direct Northern cost at 3.4 billion and the
    direct Southern cost to be 3.3 billion.
  • Lost human capital -
  • Estimating the economic value of the 600,000 who
    died
  • North - 1.06 billion
  • South - .767 billion
  • Direct government expenditure
  • North - 2.3 billion
  • South - 1 billion
  • Physical destruction in the South 1.5 billion

21
6.7 billion is worth...
  • 6.7 billion is
  • double the total exports of the U.S. from
    1850-1860.
  • double the national income in 1860
  • four times the sum of all government expenditure
    from 1789-1860
  • 6.7 billion is enough to
  • purchase the slaves from all slave owners at 1860
    prices and...
  • give each slave family 40 acres and a mule
    and....
  • still have 3.5 billion left for reparations.
  • In other words, the North could have used their
    expenditure to pay the South to end slavery
    peacefully.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com