Title: An Overview of Business Tendency Surveys
1An Overview of Business Tendency Surveys
- Richard Vincent
- Richard Evans
- Statistics Canada
- International Conference on Establishment Surveys
- Montréal
- June, 2007
2Outline
- Introduction
- Global Overview of Business Tendency Surveys
- 3. Business Tendency Surveys in France
- 4. Business Tendency Survey in Canada
- 5. Conclusion
3Introduction
- Key Question
- These surveys have many commonalities, yet there
are striking differences. - Why?
4Qualities of Business Tendency Surveys
- Relevant
- Timely
- Qualitative, but based on informed opinion
- Forward looking (focus on next period)
- Comparable
5Global Overview of BTSs
6Global Overview of BTSs
- Industrial Coverage of BTSs
- Europe
- Manufacturing
- Construction
- Retail Trade
- Other Service Industries
- Canada
- Manufacturing
- Traveller Accommodation
- Purchasing Managers (USA, Europe)
- Manufacturing
- Services
7Global Overview of BTSs
- Content
- Future / current business situation re
- Production
- Prices
- Labour market
8Business Tendency Surveys BTS in Canada
- Manufacturing BCS
- Since 1976
- Quarterly
- Stratified sample of 10,000 est.
- 2 pages
- Three sections
- Impediments
- Current conditions (last quarter)
- Future conditions (next quarter)
9BTS in Canada
- Manufacturing BCS
- Well respected as leading indicator
- Two financial institutions repackage
manufacturing BCS and release - Much media attention
- Can influence value of Cdn
10BTS in Canada
11BTS in Canada
- Manufacturing BTSs and the Canadian Statistical
System - Not required as input into System of National
Accounts - Considered during analysis of composite leading
indicators - Supported by Department of Finance and Bank of
Canada
12BTS in Canada
- Quarterly Business Conditions Survey for the
Traveller Accommodation industry - Developed in partnership with Canadian Tourism
Commission Ontario Ministry of Tourism is now
key supporter - Released for the first time May 16, 2005 (Q2)
- Stratified sample of 2,500 establishments
- 2 pages, qualitative (comparable to Manufacturing
BCS) - Garnered much media coverage
- Used by National Tourism Indicators Composite
Leading Indicator - Pilot surveys of BCS for Arts, Heritage,
Recreation
13BTS in Canada
- Why a BTS on Traveller Accommodation
- Surrogate for tourism sector
- Industry suffers from severe slowdowns and
shocks at the cusp of the business cycle - Client interest in
- forward looking indicators/intelligence
- Impediments
- Evidence based decision making for policy and
marketing - Advocacy e.g., media attention
- Policy making
- Used by National Tourism Indicators Composite
Leading Indicator
14BTS in Canada Why new survey?Tourism demand in
Canada by product
15BTS in Canada-- Why new survey?Change in
Traveller Accommodation Revenues, Yr/Yr
16BTS in CanadaWhy new survey?
17BTS in Canada Results Traveller
AccommodationOutlook for Occupancy RatesBalance
of Opinion (0neutral)
18BTS in Canada Results Traveller
AccommodationOutlook for Average Daily Room
RateBalance of Opinion (0neutral)
19BTS in Canada Results Traveller
AccommodationBusiness ImpedimentsQ4 2006
20BTS in Canada Results Traveller
AccommodationPublic Health and Safety no longer
a worry
21BTS in Canada Results Traveller
AccommodationCanadas reputation increasingly
important
22BTS in France
- Institut national de la statistique et des etudes
economiques (Insee) - Extensive array of surveys
- Since 1952
23BTS in FranceSome features
- 1-3 pages
- 1000 to 5000 respondents
- Results in overall balance of opinion significant
to 2 to 3 points
24BTS in France Some features (cont)
- Sectoral surveys
- Thematic surveys
25BTS in FrancePartial list of Surveys
26BTS in FranceExamples
- show very detailed questions on questionnaires
27BTS in FranceExamples (cont)
28BTS in FranceExamples (cont)
- show example of European outputs
29(No Transcript)
30Main Differences between Canadian and French BTS
programs
- Different emphasis on production impediments
- Better coverage in France
31Conclusion
- Reasons why Canadian and French BTS programs are
different - Different mandates, client demand
- Different pressures to harmonize
32Conclusion
- Different mandates
- Insee has a mandate to forecast GDP
- 2 quarters forward
- Highly regarded
- This generates an internal demand
- Statistics Canada does not
- Different focus
- E.g., complete set of input-output accounts by
province - Extensive suite of largely survey-based annual
surveys to support the latter
33Conclusion
- Different mandates, different priorities
- Canada surveys that produce best possible
quantitative current indicators for GDP - Survey-based
- Less financial pressure to use administrative
data sources - No influential internal client for qualitative
BTS - However, an external client for its traveler
accommodation survey
34Conclusion
- Different mandates, different priorities (cont)
- France surveys that produce best possible
qualitative leading indicators for GDP forecasts - Influential internal client
- All survey-based
- Mandatory
- Current indicators are comparatively less
important, greater financial pressures to use
administrative data sources
35Conclusion
- Different international pressures to harmonize
- Why are such differences tolerated?
- No pressures to harmonize in the sense the
different iterations of the SNA 93 have exercised
strong harmonizing influence since the 1950s - Perception that BTS are less important,
especially by agencies that do not publish
forecasts - CIRETs recommendations are not nearly as binding
- There are strong pressures from within the EU
- But Canada is not a member!
-
36Conclusion
- The Future what would need to change?
- A change in mandate
- International will and desire to compel
countries to adhere to an international standard
(in the manner of the SNA) - Client financial commitment