Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing

Description:

Presented at the Symposium for Women Entering Ecology and Evolution Today ... Headings and subheadings very helpful. Proofread (have zero tolerance for typos) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: karen249
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing


1
Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing
  • Karen Kidd, Canada Research Chair Professor,
    Biology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John
  • Presented at the Symposium for Women Entering
    Ecology and Evolution Today (SWEEET), Halifax,
    14th May 2009

2
Tip 10
  • Read the instructions/information from the
    granting agency and your institution (some people
    dont)
  • Know deadlines
  • Stick to page limits
  • Include all sections/information requested
  • Include and emphasize aspects important to
    funders (e.g. training of students for Discovery
    grant)
  • Use right page margins and font size
  • Understand evaluation criteria

3
Tip 9
  • Find mentors, seek help from successful
    applicants (colleagues, former supervisor)
  • Discuss ideas with them before starting the
    writing
  • If possible, read his or her successful
    application
  • Get feedback on your application

4
Tip 8
  • Do your homework
  • Know the literature, questions, controversies,
    issues in your field
  • Place your work in context with literature (if
    controversial, include both sides)
  • Discuss potential pitfalls and describe options

5
Tip 7
  • Be ambitious but also realistic
  • Proposals assessed based on your proven abilities
  • New researcher proposing to supervise 15 graduate
    students is unrealistic
  • If heading into newer territory, do preliminary
    work first to have proof of concept
  • Some questions reviewers ask
  • Can applicant accomplish the work?
  • Does applicant have ability to manage workload?
  • Will it generate information that will advance
    the science?

6
Tip 6
  • Agree to review grants or sit on grant review
    committees
  • Gain a lot of experience
  • Learn to recognize well crafted proposal
  • Better understanding of how agencies like NSERC
    work

7
Tip 5
  • Be clear and concise in your writing
  • State your objectives
  • Describe the methods you will be using to meet
    those objectives
  • Include details on what will be accomplished when
    and by whom
  • Headings and subheadings very helpful
  • Proofread (have zero tolerance for typos)
  • Most innovative research less likely to get
    funded if it is not well presented and sold

8
Tip 4
  • Avoid jargon (the special language of a certain
    group or profession )
  • Review committees often have range of expertise
    (e.g. aquatic toxicologist reviewing proposal on
    effects of fires on grassland communities)
  • If not possible, define jargon at the beginning
  • Otherwise, risk losing some non-specialist readers

9
Tip 3
  • Most people find grant writing challenging,
    recommend writing
  • grants as soon as you can (as graduate student or
    postdoc), get better with practice
  • during your best time of the day
  • when focused
  • when you are enthusiastic about what you are
    proposing to do
  • early, rushed proposals very obvious

10
Tip 2
  • Maintain productivity
  • Good grantsmanship cannot replace lack of
    productivity
  • Submit papers and publish your work
  • Describe any delays in productivity due to
  • Maternity leave
  • Illness (yours or family member)
  • Other exceptional circumstances such as long-term
    nature of work
  • It is taken into account by review committee

11
Tip 1
  • Write like a man (no offense intended)
  • In general, women do not promote themselves well

12
Example of difference
  • This publication has made a significant impact
    on the field and has lead to an invitation to
    present these findings, participate on a board,
    and write a review paper.
  • versus
  • This first-authored publication in a
    high-impact journal has been cited 35 times, and
    has resulted in an invitation to present at
    Harvard, sit on a national board, and write a
    review paper on the many advances this technique
    has made to the field.
  • Which style do you think is more effective?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com