Title: Climbing Feet for RiSE
1Climbing Feet for RiSE
- June 14, 2004
- Miguel Piedrahita
- BDML
2Overview of Future Climbing Foot Development
- Long-term goals
- Sufficient shear and normal forces for dynamic
vertical climbing, on a variety of surfaces - Effective attachment and detachment
- Integration of dry adhesives with spines and
perhaps other mechanisms - Integrated sensing
- Short-term needs
- We need to demonstrate effective climbing with
the RiSE platform for key dates (August, October)!
3What do we need for success in Aug/Oct?
- Video which shows progress towards vertical
climbing on a variety of surfaces - Show clear integration path of innovations from
demonstration platform
4Do we need adhesion?
- Based on location of CM and rear feet, we can
stand on 58 deg slope without adhesion. - Could we climb on a slightly flatter slope?
- Still need lots of shear force!
- Is that good enough for Aug/Oct?
58.0 deg
5Surfaces
Surface Type Soft (penetrable) Rough (impenetrable) Smooth (impenetrable)
Examples Cork board, soft woods Concrete, hard woods Glass, metal, painted wall
Good climbing strategies Claws, spines with little compliance Claws, spines with high compliance Dry adhesives, PSA, friction pads
Original M18 goals 90 deg 60 deg 30 deg
6Specialized Feet for each surface?
- Easiest way to achieve good climbing on these
three types of surfaces is to design a separate
foot for each surface! - Soft surface Larger, stiffer claws and spines
- Rough surface Delicate, individually sprung
claws and spines - Smooth surface PSA and friction pads
- Will RiSE researchers and DARPA buy into this
approach? - Not a very elegant solution, will lead to
integration challenges in the future.
7Single Climbing Foot for all Surfaces?
- Requirements
- Foot-level Compliance
- High yaw compliance to deal with changing foot
angle during stroke due to 4-bar kinematics - Some pitch roll compliance to conform to
surface - Effectively combine several adhesion/shear
mechanisms - OR
- Develop a single adhesion/shear mechanism which
will work on all surfaces
8Combine several mechanisms?
- Retractable spines/claws
- Push/pull cables, SMA
- Spines/claws with changing compliance
- Full-foot pivoting to engage different foot
surfaces - R/C servo or SMA actuation
- Requires smart actuation (surface-dependent)
Surface with firm spines
Surface with compliant spines adhesive pad
9Single Mechanism for all surfaces?
- Clever sprung claw design, like Motos
hummingbird foot - Maximize penetration on soft surfaces
- Minimize push-off force on smooth surfaces
10What needs to be done
- Decide on mechanism(s) to include in foot
- Consider front/rear foot specialization!
- Test current foot designs on test track
- Measure maximum adhesion and shear force from
each foot design - Do different feet have different optimum
trajectories? - FEA and hand calcs to determine good geometries
for polyurethane or dry adhesive pads - FEA and hand calcs to develop flexures