Title: Falls and Mobility Problems in Older Adults
1Falls and Mobility Problems in Older Adults
- Shelley B. Bhattacharya, D.O., M.P.H.
- Department of Family Medicine
- Kansas Reynolds Program in Aging
- University of Kansas Medical Center
2Epidemiology of falls in elderly
- Definitions
- Classifications
- Incidence
Ageing
3Epidemiology of falls in elderly
Definitions
- An event that results in a person inadvertently
coming to rest on the ground or other lower level
(not as a result of loss of consciousness,
violent blow, sudden onset of paralysis or
seizure) (Gibson et al., Kellogg International
Work Group, 1987) - An event which results in a person coming to rest
unintentionally on the ground or other lower
level, not as a result of major intrinsic event
(such as stroke) or overwhelming hazard (Tinetti
et al., 1988) - Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground,
floor or other lower level (Ory et al, FICSIT
trials, 1993)
4Epidemiology of falls in elderly
Classifications
- Falls
- Trigger
- Consequence
- Fallers
- Non-fallers
- Once-only fallers
- Recurrent fallers
5Epidemiology of falls in elderly
- Incidence
- Accidents are the 5th leading cause of death in
older adults 1 - Falls account for 2/3 of these accidental deaths
- 1/3 of adults over 65 living in the community
fall at least once a year - This rises to ½ of adults over age 80 2,3
- 5 of these falls result in a fracture or
hospitalization - Mobility abnormalities affect 20-40 of adults
over 65 and 40-50 of adults over age 85 4,5
6Epidemiology of falls in elderly
Incidence
- Mortality 46
- Of those who are hospitalized, 50 will not be
alive a year later - Falls constitute 2/3rd of deaths associated with
unintentional injuries - In 2000 traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounted
for 46 of fatal falls. - Cost 47
- Fall-related injuries are among the most
expensive health conditions - In 2000 179 million were spent on fatal falls
and 19 billion were spent on injuries from
non-fatal falls
7Epidemiology of falls in elderly
Incidence
- Location 48
- Most falls occur outdoors
- Women are more likely to report indoor falls
- Indoor falls are associated with frailty
- Outdoor falls are associated with compromised
health status in more active elderly
8Epidemiology of falls in elderly
Incidence
- The rate of falls and their associated
complications are twice over the age of 75
years. - 10-25 falls induce fractures in this population
- Hip fractures are more common after the age of 75
years - Those 75 years of age are more likely to report
indoor falls - Incidence is higher in certain populations (e.g.
institutionalized elderly, diabetics, Parkinsons
disease, post-stroke etc.) 49
9Fall prevention
- The quality of falls care in older adults is
suboptimal - If we can reduce the risk factors for falling,
then we can reduce the incidence and the
morbidity associated with falls - 3 studies have found that 65-100 of older adults
with 3 or more risk factors fell in a 12 month
period compared with 8-12 of older adults
without any risk factors 1,6-8
10ACOVE Indicators
- ACOVE Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elders
- The 12 new ACOVE indicators59 are designed to
improve the clinical approach to falls and
mobility in older adults - Evidence based focus 182 articles were reviewed
to obtain these indicators - Some have practice guidelines which will be
shared
11ACOVE Indicator 1
- ALL vulnerable elders should have ANNUAL
documentation about the occurrence of recent
falls
12Because
- Falls are common
- Preventable
- Frequently unreported
- Often cause injury
- Can restrict activity unnecessarily
- A recent fall is a potent predictor of future
falls - Need a multifactorial falls risk assessment for
all of your vulnerable older adults
13Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessment
- Many studies show that a multifactorial falls
risk assessment program is beneficial to assess
and intervene on falls - In one meta-analysis, the risk ratio for a first
fall in subjects enrolled in a risk assessment
program was 0.82 (95 CI 0.72-0.94) compared to
controls and was 0.63 (95 CI 0.49-0.83) for any
fall 9 - In other words, 18 fewer 1st falls and 37 fewer
of any falls with a falls risk assessment
program!
14Falls Risk Assessment Features
- Medication review
- ADL and IADL assessment
- Orthostatic blood pressure measurement
- Vision assessment
- Gait and balance evaluation
- Cognitive evaluation
- Assessment of environmental hazards
15ACOVE Indicator 2
- IF a vulnerable elder reports 2 or more falls in
the previous year, THEN document a basic fall
history within 3 weeks of the report - Because a basic fall history provides the
necessary information to implement an
individualized multifactorial falls risk
intervention strategy
16What is a fall history?
- Circumstances?
- Medications?
- Chronic conditions?
- Mobility status?
- Alcohol intake?
- You can use the positives to tailor a fall
prevention program specific for each of your
older adults 10,11
17ACOVE Indicator 3
- IF a vulnerable elder reports 2 or more falls (or
1 fall with injury) in the previous year, THEN
there should be documentation of orthostatic
vital signs within 3 months of the report - Because detection of orthostasis decreases the
risk of future falls - Is a part of the multifactorial falls prevention
intervention
18Evidence
- Supported by 13 studies including cohort and
- RCTs 12-18
- Some clinical guidelines that are recommended
- Correct postural hypotension 19
- Assess postural vitals in all older adults that
have had a recent fall, report recurrent falls or
demonstrate abnormalities in gait or balance 20 - Include a cardiovascular examination when doing a
falls risk assessment 21
19ACOVE Indicator 4
- IF a vulnerable elder reports a history of 2 or
more falls in the last year, THEN there should be
documentation of an eye examination in the
previous year or visual acuity testing within 3
months of the report - Because detection and treatment of some forms of
visual impairment reduces the risk of falls.
20Evidence
- 11 studies examined visual acuity as a falls risk
factor - One study looked at falls improvement after
expedited (within 27 days) and routine (71-212
days) cataract surgery in women over age 70 22 - After 1 year, 49 of adults in expedited group
fell at least once compared to 45 in routine
group - 18 fell twice in expedited group compared to 25
in control group
21ACOVE Indicator 5 and 6
- IF a vulnerable elder reports 2 or more falls in
the last year, OR - IF a vulnerable elder has new or worsening
difficulty with ambulation, balance or mobility, - THEN there should be documentation of basic gait,
balance and strength evaluation within 3 months
of the report
22Because
- Detection and treatment of gait and balance
disorders reduces the risk of future falls as
part of a multifactorial intervention
23Evidence
- 9 studies looked at gait and balance assessments
in falls prevention - Cohort and RCTs
- In 3 studies, abnormal gait and balance alone
were significant predictors of falls 6
24Clinical Guidelines for Gait and Balance
- Provide interventions to improve balance,
transfers and gait 19 - Do a gait and balance assessment for those
requiring medical attention because of a fall,
report recurrent falls in the past year or
demonstrate abnormalities of gait or balance 20 - Risk assessment includes assessment of gait,
balance, mobility and muscle weakness 21
25Screening and Examination of Gait and Balance
- Timed Get Up and Go Test
- Single Leg Stand Test
- Dynamic Gait Index
- Berg Balance Scale
26Timed Get Up and Go Test
- Measures functional capacity rather than
individual impairment reflects multiple
domains, useful in detecting mobility impairment - . Time it takes to stand up from arm chair, walk
3 meters (10 feet), return to chair and sit down
27Timed Get Up and Go Test
- Interpretation of Performance on the Timed Get Up
And Go Test - lt 10 sec.
- Low fall risk clients are freely mobile
encourage regular exercise - lt 20 sec.
- Moderate fall risk clients are independent with
basic transfers most go outside alone and climb
stairs, many are independence with tub and shower
transfers. PT referral may be appropriate. - 20-29 sec.
- High fall risk Gray zone functional abilities
vary. Physician or multidisciplinary team
assessment recommended. - gt30 sec.
- Very high fall risk Many are dependent with
chair and toilet transfers most are dependent
with tub and shower transfers most cannot go
outside alone few, if any, can climb stairs
independently. Physician or multidisciplinary
team assessment recommended.
28Timed Get Up and Go (TUG) Test
- Bischoff (2003)
- Community dwelling elderly women lt 12 sec. on TUG
normal - Women in residential care only 9 performed in
lt12 sec. 42 were below 20 sec 32 were between
20-30 sec. and 26 gt 30sec. - Suggests that community dwelling woman with TUG gt
12 sec. should be referred for PT evaluation - Over 50 of women in residential care at high or
very high risk of falling
29Timed Get Up and Go Test
- Nordin (2006)
- Individual variation in performance high in
institutionalized elderly - Variation increased with slower performance.
- Cognitive impairment or cuing did not increase
variability - Could use mean of three trials to obtain a more
accurate score - We do not know what this variability means in
terms of falls risk prediction
30Single Leg Stance Test
- A measure of static balance that relates to
foot/ankle strategies - Functional implications for gait, especially on
uneven surfaces, and going up/down curbs or steps - Marker of frailty in elderly persons
- Community dwelling older adults unable to stand
for 5 sec. had a 2.1 times risk of injurious
falls
31Dynamic Gait Index
- Developed to quantify gait dysfunction in older
adults during level surface walking as well as
more complex functional tasks. - Dual task demands relevant to falls risk in
elderly - Applicable to assessing balance in other groups
of patients including those with vestibular
disorders, multiple sclerosis, head injury, and
Parkinsons - Scores of 19 or less out of 24 indicate increased
risk of falling in older adults (Shumway-Cook
1997)
32Berg Balance Scale
- Measure of static and dynamic balance in
movements common in everyday life on 14-item
scale (56 points) - Useful for evaluating multiple falls risk in
community living older adults - No longer recommends a dichotomous 45 point
cut-off - Likelihood of multiple falls increases as score
decreases - Reliable test of balance in elderly in
residential care change of 8 points required to
reveal genuine change in function - Discriminates persons with Parkinsons disease
who fall vs. those who do not fall - Cut-off score of 44/56 recommended by Landers,
2008
33Limitations of Balance Scales and Screening Tools
- Screening for falls may increase fear of falling
- Falls are multifactorial, no scale captures all
aspects - Scales and balance screening tools have not been
well tested in a wide range of populations/setting
s - Uncertainty regarding predictive scores
- Scales test different aspects of balance,
sensitivity for prediction and examination may be
best with multiple tests
34ACOVE Indicator 7
- IF a vulnerable elder reports 2 or more falls in
the past year, THEN there should be documentation
of a cognitive assessment in the past 6 months - Because, detection and management of cognitive
impairment reduces the risk of falls as part of a
multifactorial intervention
35Evidence
- 7 studies
- 4 studies recommend using the MMSE 15-17,23
- Clinical Practice Guideline
- Assess mental status as part of your fall
evaluation for older adults who had a fall,
report recurrent falls in the past year or show
abnormal gait or balance 20
36ACOVE Indicator 8
- IF a vulnerable elder reports a history of 2 or
more falls in the past year, THEN there should be
documentation of an assessment and modification
of home hazards recommended in the previous year
or within 3 months of the report
37Because
- Environmental factors can contribute to risk of
falls and mobility problems - An assessment and modification of home hazards
may decrease fall risk
38Homes Are Not Typically Designed For Users of
Various Abilities
- Life Span Development
- Acute Injury
- Aging-in-Place
- Chronic Disability
39Difficulty Moving Around at Home
- Hard to go up stairs 35
- Difficulty walking 15
- Use of cane/walker 8
- Use of wheelchair/scooter 6
- Difficulty bathing 3
- Chair or bed transfers 3
(Source Fixing to Stay, 2002)
40Important Housing Features
- Main floor, bath
- Main floor, bedroom
- Accessible climate controls
- Non-slip flooring
- Bathroom aids
- No step entrance
- Covered parking
-
(Source These Four Walls, May 2003)
41Occupational Therapy considers the physical
context
- During Assessment
- Understand obstacles/barrier to participation
- Understand supports to participation
- Consider individual, groups, populations who use
the physical space - During intervention
- Reduce activity demands from the environment
- Insure adequate supports
- Facilitate performance though the use of the
environment - Avoid further functional decline and excess
disability caused by environmental factors
423 Major Problem Areas of the Home
- Outside Steps To The Entrance
- Inside Stairs To A Second Floor
- Unsafe Bathrooms
Source HUD (2001)
43Other Alternatives to Entrance with Outside Steps
- Ramps
- Earth Berms/Walkways
- Lifts
- Zero Step entrance
44Other Strategies for Getting Upstairs
- Chair lift
- Elevator
- Relocate rooms to main floor
45Strategies for Bathing
- Bath bench/chair
- Bath lift
- Grab bars
- Visual contrast
- Non slip surface
- Hand held showerhead
- Shower/wet room
- Curbless shower
46Evidence
- Many RCTs reviewed
- One RCT of over 3000 older adults 24
- Intervention in home safety mobility assessment
- Control no assessment
- Results Odds ratio of falling in the
intervention group dropped from 1.0 to 0.85 - In other words, there was a 15 drop in falls in
those receiving the in home safety mobility
assessment
47More Evidence
- Environmental assessment and modification using
an occupational therapist reduced 12 month
relative risk of falling to 0.64 (95 CI
0.5-0.83) in older adults at higher risk of
falling 25-28 - Another study compared a home safety program to a
home exercise program in older adults with severe
visual impairment 29 - Found fewer falls in the home safety program
0.59 (95 CI 0.42-0.83) - No difference with the home exercise group
48Review Study
- A review study looking at 3 trials found that
professionally prescribed home hazard assessment
and modification in older adults with a history
of falling reduced the risk of falling, RR of
0.66 (95 CI 0.54-0.81) 30
49Checklists--Examples
- Home Safety Council
- www.homesafetycouncil.org/resource_center/rc_check
list_w001.aspxp - Rebuilding Together --Checklist
- www.rebuildingtogether.org
- CDC Check for Safety
- www.cdc.gov/ncipc/pub-res/toolkit/checkforsafety.h
tm - http//www.cdc.gov/ncipc/falls/FallPrev4.pdf
- http//www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/fallsmaterial.htm
50ACOVE Indicator 9
- IF a vulnerable elder reports a history of 2 or
more falls, or 1 fall with injury, in the past
year, THEN there should be documentation of a
discussion of related risks and assistance
offered to reduce or discontinue benzodiazepine
use - Because, benzodiazepine use increases the risk of
future falls
51Evidence
- 1 RCT 93 ambulatory adults over age 65 on a
benzodiazepine, any other hypnotic,
antidepressant or tranquilizer 31 - Randomized to withdrawal plus exercise,
withdrawal only, exercise only or no intervention - Over 44 weeks, medication withdrawal group had
lower rate of falls (0.52 vs. 1.16 falls per
person-year. Difference 0.64, 95 CI
0.07-1.35)NOT significant - But, if adjusted for history of falls in past
year and total number of meds taken, hazard for
falls in the medication withdrawal group was 0.34
(0.16-0.74)
52More evidence!
- Meta analysis of observational studies found that
odds ratio for the association between
benzodiazepines and falls was - 1.40 (1.11-1.76) in cohort studies
- 2.57 (1.46-4.51) in case control studies
- 1.34 (0.95-1.88) in cross sectional studies 32
53Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Review all medications 20
- Modify psychotropic meds and discontinue, if
appropriate - Rationalize all drugs taken 19
54ACOVE Indicator 10
- IF a vulnerable elder demonstrates poor balance
or proprioception or excessive postural sway and
does not have an assistive device, THEN an
evaluation or prescription for an assistive
device should be offered within 3 months
55Because
- Impaired balance or proprioception or excessive
postural sway can contribute to instability - Appropriate treatment will reduce the likelihood
of falls and their complications
56ACOVE Indicator 11
- IF a vulnerable elder reports a history of 2 or
more falls, or 1 fall with injury, in the past
year and has an assistive device, THEN there
should be documentation of an assistive device
review in the past 6 months or within 3 months of
the report
57Because
- A poorly fitted assistive device or one used
inappropriately along with impaired balance or
proprioception or excessive postural sway can
contribute to instability - Appropriate use of an assistive device will
reduce the likelihood of falls and their
complications
58Evidence for Indicators 10 and 11
- Many studies suggest that assistive devices can
increase an older adults confidence, reduce fear
of falling and improve independence 33-35 - Some studies suggest the use of devices may
increase the risk of falling 36,37 - Other studies suggest that device use is a marker
for fall risk 38
59Fear of falling Possible contributors
- Age, female gender, poor social support, H/O
falls, depression and poor lower limb function - In addition to older age and female gender, lower
personal mastery and poor dynamic balance are
associated with fear of falling 55
60Fear of Falling Activity restriction
Poor perceived health Social withdrawal
Reduced strength
Poor balance Increased
disability Increased fall risk
Reduced
independence
Poor
quality of life
61Fear of falling may not always precipitate
activity restriction
- half of those who report fear of falling do not
restrict activities 50-53 - Lack of social support, depressive symptoms, H/O
multiple falls and presence of 2 chronic
conditions are associated with fear-induced
activity restriction 50,53-54
62ACOVE Indicator 12
- IF a vulnerable elder is found to have a problem
with gait, balance, strength or endurance, THEN
there should be documentation of a structured or
supervised exercise program offered in the
previous 6 months
63Because
- These problems can contribute to falls and
mobility dysfunction - Exercise intervention can improve the dysfunction
and reduce the likelihood of falls and their
complications
64Evidence
- Many studies show benefits of muscle strength
with gait parameters in older adults - Increases of 5-15 in ambulatory function after
8-12 weeks of a walking and endurance program
39,40 - Balance training improved force-plate balance
parameters by 20-50 41,42 - Tai chi improved balance (postural sway) by 32
and fall risk by 49 (OR 0.51, 95 CI 0.36-0.73)
43,44 - Aerobic conditioning improved balance by 20 in
adults over age 70 45
65General Gait Assessment What to look for in the
elderly person at risk for falling 56
- Changes in gait with aging
- Average gait speed declines 12 to 16 per decade
past 70 yrs. - Stride frequency increases
- Stride length decreases at a given walking speed
- Double support time increases
66General Gait Assessment What to look for in the
elderly person at risk for falling 57
- Gait Characteristics of Fallers
- Decreased trunk rotation
- Increased knee flexion
- Several small steps and reduced speed prior to
stepping over low obstacle (12) - Shorter step and stride length
- Slowed gait speeds
- Decreased single leg support time and increased
double limb support time.
67Practice Guideline
- Use exercise to improve measures of balance and
reduce incidence of falls - Use of a multidimensional exercise program that
incorporates balance training and strengthening
should improve postural stability and reduce fall
risk
68Exercise Recommendations for Older Adults with
Chronic Disease or Frailty 58
- Balance
- 1-7 x/week, dynamic exercises focused on
mobility, static exercise focused on single leg
stand, 4-10 different exercises - Progressive, targeting important postural muscle
groups, progress by decreasing base of support - Muscle Performance
- 2-3 x/week, 8 to 10 exercises
- Aerobic Capacity
- Chronic Dx - 3-5 x/week, 20-60 minutes, 50-70
Hrmax - Frailty - gt 3 x/week, at least 20 minutes, 11-13
Borg Scale - Flexibility
- 3-7 x/week, 3-5 reps each major muscle group,
10-30 s. hold
69Summary
- Extremely important to try to prevent falls in
your older patients and prevent future falls from
your current fallers - Look at their meds, cognition, orthostasis,
vision, gait, balance - Encourage exercise to improve muscle strength and
balance - Consider assistive devices
- Use OT for home safety assessments
- Screen for fear of falling and counsel to improve
mobility
70Bibliography
- 1. Rubenstein LZ, Roggins AG, Josephson KR. Falls
in the nursing home. Ann Intern Med
1994121442451. - 2. Blake AJ, Morgan K, Bendall MJ et al. Falls by
elderly people at home Prevalence and associated
factors. Age Ageing 198817365472. - 3. OLoughlin JL, Robitaille Y, Boivin JF et al.
Incidence of and risk factors for falls and
injurious falls among the community-dwelling
elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1993137342354. - 4. Alexander NB. Gait disorders in older adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc 199644434451. - 5. Trueblood PR, Rubenstein LZ. Assessment of
instability and gait in elderly - persons. Compr Ther 1991172029.
- 6. Nevitt MC. Falls in the elderly Risk factors
and prevention. In Masdeu JC, Sudarsky L,
Wolfson L, eds. Gait Disorders of Aging.
Philadelphia Lippincott-Raven, 1997, pp 1336. - 7. Robbins AS, Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR et al.
Predictors of falls among elderly people Results
of two population-based studies. Arch Intern Med
1989149628633. - 8. Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R. Fall risk
index for elderly patients based on number of
chronic conditions. Am J Med 198680429434. - 9. Chang JT, Morton SC, Rubenstein LZ et al.
Interventions for the prevention of falls in
older adults Systematic review and meta-analysis
of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2004328680. - 10. Guideline for the prevention of falls in
older persons. American Geriatrics Society,
British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy
of Orthopaedic Surgeons panel on falls
prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 200149664672. - 11. Malmivaara A, Heliovaara M, Knekt P et al.
Risk factors for injurious falls leading to
hospitalization or death in a cohort of 19,500
adults. Am J Epidemiol 1993138384394. - 12. McMurdo ME, Millar AM, Daly F. A randomized
controlled trial of fall prevention strategies in
old peoples homes. Gerontology 2000468387. - 13. Millar AM. A trial of falls prevention. Age
Ageing 199928(Suppl 1)15. - 14. Tinetti ME, BakerDI, McAvayGet al. A
multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of
falling among elderly people living in the
community. N Engl J Med 1994331821827.
71Bibliography
- 15. Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R et al. Prevention
of Falls in the Elderly Trial (PROFET) A
randomised controlled trial. Lancet
19993539397. - 16. Gallagher EM, Brunt H. Head over heels
Impact of a health promotion program to reduce
falls in the elderly. Can J Aging 1996158496. - 17. Fabacher D, Josephson K, Pietruszka F et al.
An in-home preventive assessment program for
independent older adults A randomized controlled
trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 199442630638. - 18. Rubenstein LZ, Robbins AS, Josephson KR et
al. The value of assessing falls in an elderly
population. A randomized clinical trial. Ann
Intern Med 1990113308316. - 19. Feder G, Cryer C, Donovan S et al. Guidelines
for the prevention of falls in people over 65
The Guidelines Development Group. BMJ 2000321
10071011. - 20. Guideline for the prevention of falls in
older persons. American Geriatrics Society,
British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy
of Orthopaedic Surgeons panel on falls
prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 200149664672. - 21. National Collaborating Centre for Nursing and
Supportive Care. Clinical Guideline 21 Falls The
Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older
People. London National Institute for Clinical
Excellence, 2004. - 22. Harwood RH, Foss AJ, Osborn F et al. Falls
and health status in elderly women following
first eye cataract surgery A randomised
controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2005895359. - 23. Jensen J, Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L et al.
Fall and injury prevention in older people living
in residential care facilities. Ann Intern Med
2002136733741. - 24. Hornbrook MC, Stevens VJ, Wingfield DJ et al.
Preventing falls among community-dwelling older
persons Results from a randomized trial.
Gerontologist 1994341623. - 25. Cumming RG, Thomas M, Szonyi G et al. Home
visits by an occupational therapist for
assessment and modification of environmental
hazards A randomized trial of falls prevention.
J Am Geriatr Soc 19994713971402. - 26. Day L, Fildes B, Gordon I et al. Randomised
factorial trial of falls prevention among older
people living in their own homes. BMJ
2002325128. - 27. Nikolaus T, Bach M. Preventing falls in
community-dwelling frail older people using a
home intervention team (HIT) Results from the
randomized Falls-HIT trial. J Am Geriatr Soc
200351300305. - 28. Pardessus V, Puisieux F, Di Pompeo C et al.
Benefits of home visits for falls and autonomy in
the elderly A randomized trial study. Am J Phys
Med Rehabil 200281247252. - 29. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, La Grow SJ et al.
Randomised controlled trial of prevention of
falls in people aged 4or 575 with severe visual
impairment The VIP trial. BMJ 2005331817.
72Bibliography
- 30. Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, RobertsonMC et
al. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly
people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2003(4)CD000340. - 31. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM et al.
Psychotropic medication withdrawal and a
home-based exercise program to prevent falls A
randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc
199947850853. - 32. Leipzig RM, Cumming RG, Tinetti ME. Drugs and
falls in older people A systematic review and
meta-analysis. II. Cardiac and analgesic drugs. J
Am Geriatr Soc 1999474050. - 33. Aminzadeh F, Edwards N. Exploring seniors
views on the use of assistive devices in fall
prevention. Public Health Nurs 199815297304. - 34. Tinetti ME, Powell L. Fear of falling and low
self-efficacy A case of dependence in elderly
persons. J Gerontol 199348(Spec No)3538. - 35. Dean E, Ross J. Relationships among cane
fitting, function, and falls. Phys Ther
199373494500 discussion 501504. - 36. Mann WC, Granger C, Hurren D et al. An
analysis of problems with walkers encountered by
elderly persons. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 199513
2549. - 37. Mann WC, Granger C, Hurren D et al. An
analysis of problems with walkers - encountered by elderly persons. Phys Occup Ther
Geriatr 199513123. - 38. Mahoney JE, Sager MA, Jalaluddin M. Use of an
ambulation assistive device predicts functional
decline associated with hospitalization. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 199954AM83M88. - 39. Peterson MG, Kovar-Toledano PA, Otis JC et
al. Effect of a walking program on gait
characteristics in patients with osteoarthritis.
Arthritis Care Res 199361116. - 40. Buchner DM, Cress ME, deLateur BJ et al. A
comparison of the effects of three types of
endurance training on balance and other fall risk
factors in older adults. Aging (Milano)
19979112119. - 41. Hu MH,Woollacott MH. Multisensory training of
standing balance in older adults I. Postural
stability and one-leg stance balance. J Gerontol
199449M52M61. - 42. Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Ellison GL et al. The
effect of Tai Chi Quan and computerized balance
training on postural stability in older subjects.
Atlanta FICSIT group. Frailty and injuries
Cooperative studies on intervention techniques.
Phys Ther 199777371381 discussion 382384. - 43. Shih J. Basic Beijing twenty-four forms of
Tai Chi exercise and average velocity of sway.
Percept Mot Skills 199784287290. - 44. Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Kutner NG et al.
Reducing frailty and falls in older persons An
investigation of tai chi and computerized balance
training. AtlantaFICSIT group. Frailty and
Injuries cooperative studies of intervention
techniques. J Am Geriatr Soc 199644489497. - 45. Fiebert IM, Brown E. Vestibular stimulation
to improve ambulation after a cerebral vascular
accident. Phys Ther 197959423426.
73Bibliography
- 46. Center for Disease Control, Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, 2004 - 47 Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finklestein EA, Miller
TR. The cost of fatal and non-fatal falls among
older adults. Inj Prev. 12290-295. 2006 - 48 Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people
epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for
prevention. Age Aging. 35-S2i37-i41, 2006 - 49 Masud T and Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls.
Age Aging. 30-S43-7, 2001 - 50 Howland et al., 1993
- 51 Lawrence et al., 1998
- 52 Mann et al., 2006
- 53 Zijlstra et al., 2007
- 54 Murphy et al., 2002
- 55 Deshpande et al., 2008a
- 56 Barak Y, Wagenaar RC, Hold KG. Gait
characteristics of elderly people with a history
of falls a dynamic approach. Physical Therapy
2006 - 57 From Newstead AH et al. J Geriatric PT 2007
30(3) 93-101 - 58 Section on Geriatrics, APTA, GeriNotes, vol.
15 (1), 2008 - Special thanks to Dr. Nandini Deshpande, Dory
Sabata and Deborah Cooke for their clinical and
research expertise - 59 Chang JT, Ganz, DA. Quality Indicators for
Falls and Mobility Problems in Vulnerable Elders.
JAGS Oct 2007 55(S2)S327-S334