Single Euro Payments Area SEPA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Single Euro Payments Area SEPA

Description:

DRF Conference, Basel, 25 April 2006. Overview. SEPA general objectives. SEPA instruments ... Within the SEPA, customers will be able to make payments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: annbr9
Category:
Tags: sepa | area | drf | euro | payments | single

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Single Euro Payments Area SEPA


1
Single Euro Payments AreaSEPA
Ann Börestam Payment Systems and Market
Infrastructure European Central Bank
DRF Conference, Basel, 25 April 2006
2
Overview
  • SEPA general objectives
  • SEPA instruments
  • SEPA infrastructures and standards
  • Proposed directive on payment services

3
General objectives
  • Ultimate SEPA objective
  • A euro area in which all payments are domestic
  • Within the SEPA, customers will be able to make
    payments throughout the whole euro area as
    efficiently and safely as in the national context
    today
  • If they so wish, using a single payment account
    and a single card

4
General objectives
  • The project aims to develop common instruments,
    standards, procedures and infrastructures in
    order to foster substantial economies of scale




5
General objectives
The multidimensional aspect of the project and as
a consequence its complexity
  • Specific issues concerning different payment
    instruments
  • Credit transfers
  • Direct debits
  • Cards
  • And some  common  horizontally
  • Infrastructure (ACHs)
  • Standardisation
  • - Common regulatory aspects

6
General objectives
The timing 01/01/06 01/01/07 01/01/08
01/01/09 01/01/10 31/12/10 Today
Deadline 1 Deadline
2 -Consolidation Preparation
Migration to be
completed
-Some local instruments
to be
phased out
The timing 01/01/06 01/01/07 01/01/08
01/01/09 01/01/10 31/12/10 Today
Deadline 1 Deadline
2 -Consolidation Preparation
Migration to be
completed
-Some local instruments
to be
phased out
The timing 01/01/06 01/01/07 01/01/08
01/01/09 01/01/10 31/12/10 Today
Deadline 1 Deadline 2



SEPA instruments available
SEPA instruments in general use
7
SEPA instruments

The EPC has organised the SEPA project around
three core payment instruments Credit transfers
? Rulebook Direct Debits ? Rulebook Card
payment ? SEPA Cards Framework A lot of
work has been done, but there are still some
shortfalls of Rulebooks/Framework that needs to
be addressed by the EPC


8
SEPA instruments
  • Credit transfer
  • EPC achievement
  • A basic scheme, with a maximum 3 day execution
    time
  • Improvements required
  • investigating the possibility for D1 execution
    time
  • same day transaction standard to be defined by
    EPC
  • structured customer information e.g. remittance
    information and a code for automatic
    reconciliation

9
SEPA instruments
  • Direct debit
  • EPC achievement
  • A basic direct debit scheme with mandate flow
    from debtor to creditor
  • Improvements required
  • an alternative mandate flow from debtor to debtor
    bank
  • business-to-business option
  • ensure reachability of all debtor banks

10
SEPA instruments
  • Cards
  • EPC achievement
  • Adoption of SEPA cards framework (SCF)
  • Improvements required
  • interoperability of schemes (standards, common
    business practices)
  • interchange fees (no longer differences based on
    geographical ground
  • fraud prevention

11
SEPA infrastructures and standards
  • Standardisation
  • at the very core of the SEPA project
  • covers a wide range from POSs terminals to
    settlement infrastructure standards
  • standards are the prerequisite for ending
    national fragmentation, integrating markets,
    promoting interoperability and consolidation of
    infrastructures




12
SEPA infrastructures and standards
  • Infrastructure
  • consolidation needed but may take time
    (investment cycles)
  • interoperability




13
Conclusion
Certainly, major parts are well on track but
should be careful not to loose momentum
Factors that could hinder progress - Weakness
of banks commitment - Low use / low interest by
end-users (including public administrations) -
Design of solutions that are below current
national standards / Mini-SEPA - Non-coherent
assessment procedure / self-assessments ?
Communication strategy, assessment strategy,
addressing shortfalls, profitable solutions etc



14
Proposed directive on payment services
  • The aim of the Commission is to create a Single
    Payment Market by eliminating barriers between
    member states for the provision of payment
    services, and by creating conditions for
    competition, integration and rationalisation of
    national payment systems.

15
Proposed directive on Payment services
  • Scope of the proposed directive
  • Both consumer and business payments (Titles III
    and IV of the directive do not apply on payments
    exceeding EUR 50 000)
  • At least one payment service provider must be
    located within the Community
  • All currencies

16
Proposed directive on Payment services
  • Payment institutions
  • Payment service providers which are not a credit
    institution, an e-money institution or a post
    office giro institution
  • Payment services, operational and ancillary
    services, accessing and operation of payment
    systems
  • Should be licensed
  • Authorisation requirements could be waived under
    certain circumstances (in that case no single
    license)

17
Proposed directive on payment services
  • Information requirements
  • Contractual conditions including changes
  • Obligations and liability
  • Execution times
  • Point in time of acceptance of a payment order
  • Charges or fees
  • Exchange rate
  • Redress and complaint procedures
  • Applicable law

18
Proposed directive on payment services
  • Rights and obligations
  • Authorisation of payment transactions
  • User liability max EUR 150 (except when acting
    fraudulently or being gross negligent)
  • Acceptance of payment orders
  • Execution times D1
  • Strict liability for non-execution or defective
    execution

19
Thank you very much for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com