Title: The Nature of the Community
1The Nature of the Community
2Community
- Any assemblage of populations of living organisms
in a prescribed area or habitat - Trees at Lake Louise
- Rodents in Long-Leaf Pine
- Ants in disturbed areas
3Two models of the Community
- Rivet model
- Obligate association or obligate exclusion of
species - Redundancy model
- No interaction between species
- Two models represent the extremes of possibilities
4The Community View of Frederic E. Clements
- Clements saw the community as a superorganism in
which the functions of various species are
connected like the parts of the body. - Clementss view included the following ideas
- that component species had coevolved so as to
enhance their interdependent functioning - that communities were discrete entities with
recognizable boundaries
5The Community View of Henry A. Gleason
- Gleason saw the community as a fortuitous
association of species whose adaptations and
requirements enable them to live together under
the particular conditions of a particular place. - Gleasons view included the following ideas
- that component species occurred together largely
by coincidence - that there was no distinct boundary where one
community meets another
6Diverse Concepts of Community
- The holistic concept of Clements and others
recognizes that we can only understand each
species in terms of its contributions to the
dynamics of the entire system. - The individualistic concept of Gleason and others
recognizes that community structure and function
simply express the interactions of individual
species, and do not reflect any organization
above the species level.
7Community Concepts - A Middle Ground?
- An intermediate or mixed view of communities also
exists, which - accepts the individualistic view that most
interactions are antagonistic and that
communities are haphazard assemblages of species - accepts the holistic premise that some attributes
of communities arise from interactions among
species, reinforced through coevolution
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10A Natural Unit of Ecological Organization?
- The holistic view of communities predicts a
closed community - the distributions of species are coincident
- the boundaries between communities (ecotones) are
distinct - The individualistic view of communities predicts
an open community - the distributions of species are independent
- the boundaries between communities are diffuse
11Theoretical view of open vs. closed community
12Open vs. Closed communities
13When do communities have distinct boundaries?
- The concept of closed communities predicts
discrete boundaries between communities - such boundaries should be expected under two
circumstances in nature - when there is an abrupt transition in the
physical environment - when one species or life form dominates strongly,
such that the edge of its range determines the
limits of many other species
14Ecotones
- Ecotones represent boundaries between closed
communities - such boundaries occur when there are sharp
discontinuities in the physical environment - the interface between terrestrial and aquatic
communities - the boundary between soil types with contrasting
properties (such as the boundary between
serpentine and nonserpentine soils)
15Plants contribute to conditions maintaining
ecotones.
- Transitions between broad-leaved and
needle-leaved forests become more pronounced
because of conditions created by the plants
themselves - increased soil acidity and greater accumulation
of undecayed litter distinguishes the
needle-leaved forest - Fire may sharpen the boundary between prairies
and forests in the Midwestern U.S. - perennial grasses resist fire damage, but fires
cannot penetrate deeply into forests
16Sharp ecotone between aquatic and terrestrial
habitats
17Change in soil elements
18Ecotone between grassland and forest
19Change in species
20The Continuum Concept 1
- Ecotones are less likely to form along gradients
of gradual environmental change - the deciduous forest region of eastern North
America does not fit the concept of the closed
community - few species have closely overlapping geographic
ranges, tending to be independently distributed - sharp ecotones are not found
- As ecologists sought to understand the ecology of
the eastern forests, they turned to the continuum
concept.
21The Continuum Concept 2
- The continuum concept embodies several key
concepts - plants and animals replace one another
continuously along environmental gradients - species have different geographic ranges,
suggesting independent evolutionary backgrounds
and ecological relationships - because few species have broadly overlapping
ranges, the assemblage of species found in any
particular place does not represent a closed
community
22Range of trees found in Kentucky
23Gradient Analysis
- A gradient analysis is usually undertaken by
measuring the abundances of species and physical
conditions at a number of locations within a
landscape - the abundances of species are then plotted as a
function of the value of any physical condition - Studies by R.H. Whittaker in the Great Smoky
Mountains revealed few cases of distinct ecotones
between associations of species - species were distributed more or less
independently over ranges of ecological
conditions, with few cases of consistent
association between species
24Gradient analysis of tree communities in Smoky
Mtns
25Gradient analysis of tree communities
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Distributional Relations of Species in Communities
- Species should show similar geographic patterns
as communities - Floristic provinces are large vegetational
communities - Boundaries are called tension zones
- Usually also the limit of many species
distributions - Can use measure of similarity to compare 2
communities (ranges from 0 to 1)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34Indicator Species
- Indicator species stand for a given community
- Need to meet certain assumptions
- Includes Umbrella, Flagship, Keystone
- Should have worldwide applications
- Tiger beetles
35(No Transcript)