Graham Kent

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Graham Kent

Description:

Creating a more coherent commissioning framework for eye care services over and ... Instead a blacklist of people who may not. Building on Success ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: mariaa6

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Graham Kent


1
Graham Kent
  • Barrister
  • Senior Principal Legal Officer
  • NHS Primary Care and Professional Regulation
  • DH Legal Services

2
Health Act 2006 3 Key Aims
  • Removing restrictions on contracting for NHS
    funded sight tests
  • Creating a more coherent commissioning framework
    for eye care services over and above the sight
    test
  • Strengthening controls on redemption of optical
    vouchers

3
Why are these changes needed?
  • Current system restricts who PCTs may contract
    with to optometrists, OMPs and registered
    corporate bodies
  • These restrictions no longer reflect the reality
    of service provision
  • DH wants to give PCTs the ability to contract
    directly with businesses who are providing
    services BUT
  • Qualified clinicians must undertake the clinical
    work

4
Provider / Performer Model
  • But with important differences from GMS and GDS
  • 3 levels in GOS model
  • Mandatory
  • Additional
  • Enhanced

5
Advantages
  • PCTs will be able to contract with a wider range
    of providers
  • PCTs will be able to commission enhanced services
    over and above the sight test from these or other
    providers
  • More coherent and flexible framework
  • Like that used for other primary care services

6
Controls over Redemption of Optical Vouchers
  • Allows PCTs to issues notices that no further
    payments will be made to a supplier who may have
    been fraudulent
  • Not a list of suppliers who may redeem vouchers
  • Instead a blacklist of people who may not

7
Building on Success
  • Ministers view is that NHS sight testing service
    delivers successfully for patients
  • Wanted to reduce restrictions and improve
    commissioning framework
  • Did not want to fundamentally change the current
    sight testing system

8
The Structure of the Changes
  • 3 sets of Regs laid 1 May 2008 and coming into
    force 1 August 2008
  • The General Ophthalmic Services Contracts
    Regulations 2008
  • The Primary Ophthalmic Services Regulations 2008
  • The Performers List (Amendments) Regulations 2008
  • 1 set of Regs laid 1 May 2008 and coming into
    force shortly
  • The Primary Ophthalmic Services Transitional
    Provisions Regulations 2008

9
Guidance and Models
  • On PCC website
  • All 4 sets of Regulations
  • DH guidance on all 4 sets of Regulations
  • Model contracts for mandatory services and for
    additional services
  • Model patient display notices and (for mobile
    contractors) model patient information leaflets
  • Model application forms contractors and
    performers
  • Model transitional documentation for contractors
    and performers
  • Various associated documents

10
What does not change?
  • Who is entitled to an NHS sight test
  • Patients being able to choose their GOS
    contractor
  • Contractors being able to have a GOS contract
  • Must meet national criteria
  • Must satisfy local decision making on service
    quality, eg. inspection of equipment and premises
  • Centrally negotiated sight test fee
  • Sight tests remain a demand led not a locally
    commissioned service
  • Who may conduct a sight test

11
The Big Things that are Changing
  • Ophthalmic Lists and Supplementary Lists replaced
    by contracts and performers lists
  • Present term contract is a misnomer it is in
    fact a statutory arrangement
  • GOS is provided pursuant to regulations not under
    contract
  • From 1 August 2008 the provider will have to have
    an actual contract document signed by both parties

12
The Model Contracts
  • Lengthy documents
  • Contain all provisions required by the Contracts
    Regs
  • Contain various other provisions strongly
    recommended to make the contract work
  • Ignore them at your peril!
  • Optical bodies also recommending their members to
    use the models

13
Dispute Resolution Procedures
  • Model contracts contain these
  • Contractors can opt to be a health service body
    in which case the NHS internal disputes procedure
    will ultimately determine the outcome
  • Otherwise disputes can end up before the county
    court if not resolved locally
  • The Service Committees and Tribunal Regulations
    regime will no longer exist for GOS

14
Contractual Obligations
  • Contracts contain obligations on both parties
  • Contracts can be ended for breach of these
    obligations
  • Removal for unsuitability, inefficiency and fraud
    will not be applicable any more
  • There are other procedures such as breach notices
    and financial sanctions
  • Late payment notices can be issued by the
    contractor to late paying PCTs/agencies

15
Applications for a Contract
  • Similar to present application for inclusion in
    the Ophthalmic List BUT
  • Literally anybody may apply for a contract
  • Not everyone will get one
  • All current mandatory and discretionary
    exclusions apply
  • Requirement of suitability (for award but not for
    termination of contract)
  • No chance for PCT to limit the number of persons
    who may have a contract

16
Its a contract, Jim, but not as we know it
17
Differences from primary medical and dental
contracts
  • GOS contracts do not guarantee any NHS work
  • No predetermined annual contract value
  • NHS remuneration will depend on the number of
    patients who request an NHS sight test
  • PCTs will not be able to rely on the fact that
    contractors are regulated by professional bodies
    they shouldnt have done this anyway

18
3 possible types of contractor
  • Individual
  • Partnership
  • Partners will no longer be listed separately
  • Single contract with partnership as a whole
  • PCTs must check all partners individually
  • Look out for LLPs uncommon in GOS at present
  • Corporate body
  • May be registered or unregistered
  • PCTs must check all directors, chief executive
    and company secretary individually

19
Rejected Applications
  • Statutory mechanism
  • PCTs must give a reason
  • Right of appeal to FHSAA
  • New contract disqualification mechanism
  • Similar to national disqualification for
    performers
  • PCTs would normally apply to FHSAA for a contract
    disqualification
  • But FHSAA can consider of its own motion if it
    rejects a contract appeal

20
Performers Lists
  • Performers list resembles current supplementary
    list
  • Performer may be included in only one performers
    list
  • May then perform anywhere in England (but not
    Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland)
  • Possible for an individual to be both contractor
    and performer
  • If so, he must be on the performers list in one
    area and have a contract in each area
  • A contractor/performer with contracts in multiple
    PCTs may choose which performers list to be on

21
No Contract Numbers
  • Contractor must have a separate contract with
    each PCT
  • Separate contracts not required/allowed for more
    than one set of premises in a PCTs patch
  • No legally required list of contractors
  • Hence no legally required contract number
  • PCTs may still need to allocate their own account
    numbers on a one per premises basis, eg. for
    Exeter or local payment purposes

22
Transitional Arrangements
  • Automatic process for existing persons on the
    ophthalmic list
  • The PCT must offer them a model contract
  • The PCT must fill in the blank spaces in
    accordance with the current ophthalmic list entry
  • They need to notify the PCT in writing by 1 July
    2008
  • If they dont, this doesnt mean they wont get a
    contract, just that it wont be automatic or
    definitely by 1 August 2008

23
Exceptions to automatic transfer
  • Front men in grandparenting arrangements
  • Anyone included in the ophthalmic list in error
  • Dispensing opticians
  • Costco
  • Questionable contractors
  • Suspended from the list
  • Contingently removed
  • Subject to inquiry or investigation as to
    suitability or fraud

24
Further Information Required
  • PCTs may not have full details required by the
    Contracts Regulations
  • Private addresses
  • Details and suitability of
  • Directors
  • Chief Executive
  • Company Secretary
  • of registered corporate bodies
  • Where this information is not held it must be
    supplied before a contract can be finalised

25
Performers Lists Transitional Arrangements
  • Main transitional provisions are in the Schedule
    to the Performers List (Amendment) Regulations
  • Duty to prepare in advance of 1 August 2008 is in
    the Transitional Provisions Regs
  • Automatic transfer procedure
  • Questionable performers
  • Suspended from the supplementary list
  • Contingently removed
  • Subject to inquiry or investigation as to
    suitability or fraud
  • will be carried over on to the performers list

26
Contractor/Performers
  • PCTs will need to write to ask individual and
    partnership contractors whether they are included
    in any other ophthalmic list
  • If so, on which performers list would they prefer
    to be listed?
  • Performers choice but must be listed with a
    PCT with which they hold a contract

27
Unresolved Old Regs Applications
  • Unresolved and pending at 31 July 2008
  • If performer is supplementary listed elsewhere
    (and will thus be performers listed elsewhere)
    then application will be void
  • Otherwise should be treated as an application for
    inclusion in the performers list
  • Unresolved corporate optician applications to be
    treated as void
  • Any new (ie. post 1 August) application would
    then be caught by the need for CRB checks

28
The Devil is in the Detail
  • Graham Kent
  • DH Legal Services

29
Mandatory services and additional services
  • Mandatory high street services
  • Additional mobile or domiciliary services
  • Mobile services no longer just a subset of GOS
  • Compulsory for PCTs to have contracts to provide
    (some) mobile services
  • Separate written contracts needed for mandatory
    and additional services
  • Any contractor may provide one but not the other
  • Suitability to provide additional services may be
    different
  • Treating a vulnerable population hence a greater
    degree of risk

30
The Contracts
  • Modelled on GMS and GDS contracts
  • Many provisions are similar and relevant but also
    many are different and irrelevant
  • GOS contracts considerably shorter than those for
    GMS and GDS
  • If you have responsibility for GOS contracts
    youll find it useful to liaise with GMS and GDS
    contract colleagues, ie. across PCT/support
    agencies boundaries if need be

31
Complaints
  • Complaints procedure is laid down in Contracts
    Regulations and set out in the model contracts
  • Same procedure as in the current regulations
  • One small difference Sch 1 para 27 of the
    Contracts Regs gives PCT power to require the
    contractor to advise the number of complaints
    received
  • No prescribed intervals for this
  • PCT will need to agree what intervals with each
    contractor
  • Unlike GMS and GDS where PCT can determine those
    intervals unilaterally

32
LINks
  • Local Involvement Networks
  • Patient Forums abolished
  • Contracts Regulations make provision for
    inspection by LINks
  • Existing GOS Regulations will be amended before 1
    August 2008 and the new regulations will just
    carry this forward

33
Information Leaflet
  • Mobile providers only
  • Required content set out in Schedule 4 to the
    Contracts Regulations
  • Model leaflet on the website

34
Duty to Patients
  • Contractors must put the interests of the patient
    before their own financial interests Reg 16(4)
  • Contractors must not mislead patients about the
    availability, quality and extent of the services
    available under the contract in order
    to get private work Sch 1 para 2

35
Mobile services inducements and advice
  • Mobile contractors must not offer improper
    inducements, particularly not to proprietors,
    managers and staff of residential homes or day
    centres Sch 2 para 7
  • Mobile contractors must not seek to mislead
    anyone about the quality and extent of the
    services available under the mobile contract
  • Includes any misleading advertising
  • Discounts or special offers generally available
    to patients are exempt

36
Anti-discrimination
  • Contractors may not refuse to provide GOS on
    grounds of race, gender, social class, age,
    religion, sexual orientation, appearance,
    disability or medical or ophthalmic condition or
    on patients decision to accept or refuse private
    services Sch 1 para 1(5)
  • Contractors must keep written records if they
    refuse to provide GOS unless the patient is
    ineligible Sch 1 para 1(6)

37
Standards of Conduct
  • Contractors to keep a register of gifts worth
    over 100 Sch 1 para 52
  • Contractors to hold clinical negligence and
    public liability insurance Sch 1 para 51

38
Change in notifications by mobile providers
  • Evidence that mobile contractors had been putting
    in notification of intended visits months ahead
  • Obviously an abuse as services can only be
    provided following a request by or on behalf of
    the patient
  • New 8 week maximum period of notice as well as
    existing 3 week minimum for 3 or more patients at
    a sitting
  • New 8 week maximum period of notice as well as
    existing 48 hour minimum for 1 or 2 patients

39
General duty to comply with the law
  • Para 53 of the Contracts regulations imposes a
    general duty to comply with relevant legislation
    and guidance
  • Includes any legislation under the NHS Act
  • Also includes the Opticians Act
  • For OMPs also includes the Medical Act
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)