Organization of Workstations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Organization of Workstations

Description:

Some of their advantages are emphasized by decision makers. ... Reduce distances by efficient layout and arrangement. Use a 'bus' instead of a 'taxi' system. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: laura119
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Organization of Workstations


1
Organization of Workstations
  • Applications in traditional and lean systems
  • Tradeoffs among guidelines depend on type of
    production, number and types of items being
    produced, etc.
  • Nine guidelines
  • Use Specialization Even Though It Sacrifices
    Versatility
  • Consider Group Technology
  • Consider Both Non-progressive and Progressive
    Assembly
  • Balance Flow Lines
  • Minimize Material Handling Cost
  • Decouple Tasks
  • Make Several Identical Items at the Same Time
  • Combine Operations and Functions
  • Vary Environmental Stimulation Inversely with
    Task Stimulation

2
Step 1 Clean the space
vs
  • 5 Ss (from Lean )
  • _______________
  • _______________
  • _______________
  • _______________
  • _______________

3
G1Use specialization even though it sacrifices
versatility
  • Special-purpose equipment
  • Specialized materials
  • Specialized labor
  • Group technology

4
G2 Consider group technology
  • Form families of items that are almost identical.
  • May be based on part geometry or process
    similarities.
  • Classification process depends on solving coding
    problem.
  • May be the basis of factory specialization.
  • Imitate a flow line and shift fixed costs of the
    flow line to the process.
  • Find common solutions to common problems.

5
Cell layout
  • Cell machines and skills for producing related
    items placed close together.
  • Advantages
  • Specialization
  • Minimum material handling
  • Simpler production control
  • Shorter throughput times
  • Lower work-in-process (WIP) inventory
  • Disadvantages
  • Lower equipment utilization
  • Loss of flexibility
  • Cost of setting up and maintaining concept

6
G3 Consider both non-progressive and progressive
assembly
  • Consider an assembly of N elements that requires
    m people to work.
  • Non-progressive assembly Each worker does all N
    elements.
  • Progressive assembly The job is split so each
    worker does N/m elements.
  • Which should we choose?

7
Non-progressive assembly
Advantages Neutral Characteristics Disadvantages
Balance delay time is eliminated. Scheduling flexibility is increased. Shocks do not have multiple effects. Musculoskeletal disorders are less of a problem. Satisfaction may increase. Quality may be higher or lower with each type of assembly. Material handling has advantages and disadvantages in both. Space requirements could favor either. Walking may be required in either. Direct labor cost/hour is higher. Skill requirements and training costs are higher. Equipment capital cost is higher. In-process inventory is higher. Supervision is more difficult.
8
Reasons for flow lines
  • Some of their advantages are emphasized by
    decision makers.
  • Cost advantages that favor flow lines are
    visible, whereas the costs that do not favor them
    are lost in overhead figures.
  • Many of their disadvantages can be overcome by
    good system design.
  • Work cells in lean production can be combined
    into flow lines and balanced.

9
G4 Balance flow lines
  • Balance the tradeoffs between number of stations
    or cells and the amount produced by each station
    to meet production times as smoothly and
    efficiently as possible.
  • Before balancing flow lines
  • Ask whether it is appropriate to balance the
    line.
  • Gather the givens
  • Table of work elements and times
  • Precedence diagram
  • Required units/minute from line (Takt time)
  • Determine
  • Number of stations/cells
  • Number of workers at each station/cell
  • Elements to be done at each station/cell

10
Standard balancing technique
  • Example Final assembly of an electronic organ
    (from Weiss and Gershon, Production and
    Operations Management (2nd ed.), 1993, Allyn
    Bacon.)

11
Line balancing
  • Step 1 draw the precedence diagram

12
Line balancing
  • Step 2 Determine quantity to be made and takt
    time.
  • Example
  • Production goal 200 organs/day (set by customer
    demand)
  • Cycle time (1 day/200 organs) (8hrs/day)
    (3600 sec/hr)
  • 144 sec/organ
  • Estimate an approximate number of stations.
  • Example
  • Number of stations total time required / takt
    time
  • 510 sec / 144 sec 3.54 _______

13
Line balancing
  • Step 3 Make a trial solution.
  • Longest task time rule from among the available
    tasks, choose the one that takes the longest. In
    case of a tie, choose the one with the most
    followers.

Station Task Task time Total time Station Idle Time Total Idle time

14
Station Task Task time Total time Station Idle Time Total Idle time

15
Line balancing
  • Step 4 Determining the efficiency
  • idle time ( of stations cycle time) - (time
    to produce 1 unit)
  • efficiency (time to produce 1 unit) / ( of
    stations longest station time)
  • or
  • efficiency (theoretical minimum cycle time) /
    (achieved cycle time)

16
Line balancing
  • Problems
  • Mean times for stations are not equal, so there
    is balance-delay time.
  • The speed at a station in a balanced line must be
    set at the speed of a slow operator on a slow
    station.
  • Cycle times vary.
  • Options
  • Consider element sharing.
  • Remember that cycle times are not fixed.
  • Remember that elements often can be redefined.
  • Interchange elements from the assembly task and
    the subassembly tasks.
  • kanban - inventory control pull system
  • parts placed in containers for next cell
  • when parts are pulled, they must be replaced

17
G5 Minimize material handling cost
  • Elements of material handling cost
  • Material handling cost/year Capital cost
    Operating cost
  • Operating cost Number of trips/year Cost/trip
  • Cost/trip Fixed cost/trip (Variable
    cost/distance distance/trip)
  • Reduce material handling cost by
  • Consider how utilization affects capital costs
    vs. operating costs.
  • Eliminate peak loads through scheduling.
  • Replace transportation with communication.
  • Reduce number of trips through scheduling and
    combining.
  • Reduce fixed costs by using line production.
  • Move more product/labor hour.
  • Reduce distances by efficient layout and
    arrangement.
  • Use a bus instead of a taxi system.
  • Emphasize reducing total MH costs rather than
    individual elements.

18
Strategies to reduce material handling cost
  • Consider how utilization affects capital costs
    vs. operating costs.
  • Eliminate peak loads through scheduling.
  • Replace transportation with communication.
  • Reduce number of trips through scheduling and
    combining.
  • Reduce fixed costs by using line production.
  • Move more product/labor hour.
  • Reduce distances by efficient layout and
    arrangement.
  • Use a bus instead of a taxi system.
  • Emphasize reducing total MH costs rather than
    individual elements.

19
G6 Decouple tasks
  • Types of flow lines
  • Operation-only line
  • Order-picking line
  • Assembly line
  • Decisions to consider
  • Single product or multiple products?
  • Assemble in sub-assemblies or on the line?
  • How to divide tasks among stations?
  • Balanced or unbalanced?
  • Characteristics of well-designed lines
  • Minimum idle time at the stations
  • High quality (enough time at each station)
  • Minimum capital cost

20
Lean manufacturing (Just-in-Time)
  • Reduction of work-in-process inventories to
    minimal amounts, to force management to solve
    problems by revealing them.
  • Little product variety
  • Producing only what the customer wants, when it
    is wanted
  • High quality
  • High equipment availability
  • Short setup times
  • Cross-trained skilled workers

21
Shocks and Disturbances
  • Cause cycle times to vary.
  • May result from operator variability, station
    starvation, or station blockage.
  • Buffers provide flexibility/tolerance.
  • In lean systems, the presence of inventory
    buffers indicate waste
  • opportunities to improve process
  • goal is to eliminate the need for buffers

22
Buffering Techniques
  • Decouple by changing product flow
  • Buffers at or between stations
  • Buffers due to carrier design
  • Buffers off-line
  • Decouple by moving operators
  • Utility operator
  • Help your neighbor
  • n operators, n workstations
  • n operators, gtn workstations

23
G7Make several identical items at the same time
  • Task stages
  • Get ready
  • Do
  • Put away
  • Reduce cost/unit by prorating get-ready and
    put-away over more units.

24
G8 Combine operations and functions
  • Use multi-function materials.
  • Use multi-function tools.

25
G9 Vary environmental stimulation inversely with
task stimulation
  • Low-stimulation tasks
  • Add physical movement to the task
  • Add stimulation to the environment
  • High-stimulation tasks
  • Make privacy possible
  • Discourage excess conversation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com