Continuous System Modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Continuous System Modeling

Description:

The heat exchangers have a smaller time constant than the heating. ... At the top level, the user may frequently not notice any 'black' bonds or 'black' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: drfranois
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Continuous System Modeling


1
ThermoBondLib A New Modelica Library for
Modeling Convective Flows
François E. Cellier ETH Zürich, Switzerland
Jürgen Greifeneder University of Kaiserslautern,
Germany
2
Properties of Bond Graphs
  • Bond graphs represent the power flowing through a
    physical system.
  • Since every physical system must observe the laws
    of energy conservation, all such systems can be
    represented topologically by means of the power
    flows between neighboring energy storages.
  • In most physical systems, power can be expressed
    as a product of two adjugate variables, an effort
    (e) and a flow (f).

3
Properties of Bond Graphs II
Representation of a bond
  • Since a bond references two variables, we need
    two equations to evaluate them.
  • In all systems, the effort and flow variables are
    evaluated at opposite ends of the bond.
  • The side that evaluates the flow variable is
    often marked with a small vertical bar, the
    causality stroke.

4
Effort Flow Generalized Momentum Generalized Position
e f p q
Electrical Circuits Voltage u (V) Current i (A) Magnetic Flux ? (Vsec) Charge q (Asec)
Translational Systems Force F (N) Velocity v (m / sec) Momentum M (Nsec) Position x (m)
Rotational Systems Torque T (Nm) Angular Velocity ? (rad / sec) Torsion T (Nmsec) Angle ? (rad)
Hydraulic Systems Pressure p (N / m2) Volume Flow q (m3 / sec) Pressure Momentum G (Nsec / m2) Volume V (m3)
Chemical Systems Chem. Potential ? (J / mol) Molar Flow ? (mol/sec) - Number of Moles n (mol)
Thermodynamic Systems Temperature T (K) Entropy Flow S (W / K) - Entropy S (J / K )
5
Example Bond Graph of Electrical Circuit
6
Example Bond Graph of Electrical Circuit II
7
Example Bond Graph of Electrical Circuit III
8
Example Bond Graph of Electrical Circuit IV
9
Convective Flows
  • When mass moves macroscopically from one place to
    another, it always carries its volume and its
    heat along. These are inseparably properties of
    the material representing the mass.
  • Consequently, a single bond no longer suffices to
    describe convective flows.
  • Each convective flow is described by two
    independent variables, e.g. temperature and
    pressure, or temperature and volume, and
    therefore, we require at least two parallel bonds.

10
Convective Flows II
  • Since the internal energy of material has three
    components
  • we chose to represent the convective flow by
    three parallel bonds.

11
Convective Flows III
12
Thermo-bond Connectors
13
Heat Dissipation
14
Heat Dissipation II
15
Volume Work
16
Capacitive Fields
17
Capacitive Fields II
18
Capacitive Fields III
?
p TRM/V
pV TRM
T T0exp((ss0 - R(ln(v)-ln(v0 )))/cv)
?
T/T0 exp((ss0 - R(ln(v/v0 )))/cv)
?
ln(T/T0 ) (ss0 - Rln(v/v0 ))/cv
?
cvln(T/T0 ) ss0 - Rln(v/v0 )
19
Capacitive Fields IV
g T(cp s)
?
h cpT
g h - Ts
for ideal gases
20
The Pressure Cooker
21
The Pressure Cooker II
22
(No Transcript)
23
Simulation of Pressure Cooker
  • We are now ready to compile and simulate the
    model.

24
Simulation Results
25
Simulation Results II
Heating is sufficiently slow that the temperature
values of the different media are essentially
indistinguishable. The heat exchangers have a
smaller time constant than the heating. During
the cooling phase, the picture is very different.
When cold water is poured over the pressure
cooker, air and steam in the small boundary layer
cool down almost instantly. Air and steam in the
bulk cool down more slowly, and the liquid water
cools down last.
26
Simulation Results III
The pressure values are essentially
indistinguishable throughout the
simulation. During the heating phase, the
pressures rise first due to rising temperature.
After about 150 seconds, the liquid water begins
to boil, after which the pressure rises faster,
because more steam is produced (water vapor
occupies more space at the same temperature than
liquid water). The difference between boundary
layer and bulk pressure values in the cooling
phase is a numerical artifact.
27
Simulation Results IV
The relative humidity decreases at first, because
the saturation pressure rises with temperature,
i.e., more humidity can be stored at higher
temperatures. As boiling begins, the humidity
rises sharply, since additional vapor is
produced. In the cooling phase, the humidity
quickly goes into saturation, and stays there,
because the only way to ever get out of
saturation again would be by reheating the water.
28
Simulation Results V
The mass fraction defines the percentage of water
vapor contained in the air/steam mixture. Until
the water begins to boil, the mass fraction is
constant. It then rises rapidly until it reaches
a new equilibrium, where evaporation and
condensation balance out. During the cooling
phase, the boundary layer cools down quickly, and
can no longer hold the water vapor contained.
Some falls out as water, whereas other steam gets
pushed into the bulk, temporarily increasing the
mass fraction there even further.
29
The Air Balloon
  • We got a problem. Whereas the air balloon
    operates under conditions of constant pressure
    (isobaric conditions), the gas bottle operates
    under con-ditions of constant volume (isochoric
    conditions).
  • Our air model so far is an isobaric model.

30
The Air Balloon II
  • We measure the volumetric flow leaving the gas
    bottle and generate a volumetric flow of equal
    size in the modulated flow source. The energy
    for that flow comes out of the thermal domain
    (the gas bottle cools down.

31
The Air Balloon III
32
The Air Balloon Simulation Results
33
The Water Loop
34
The Water Loop Simulation Results
35
Conclusions
  • Modeling convective flows correctly using the
    bond graph approach to modeling, i.e., taking
    into account volumetric flows, mass flows, and
    heat flows, requires a new class of bonds, called
    thermo-bonds.
  • A new bond graph library was introduced that
    operates on this new class of vector bonds.
  • At the top level, the user may frequently not
    notice any black bonds or black component
    models. The entire model seems to be located at
    the higher, more abstract thermo-bond graph
    layer.
  • Yet internally, the red thermo-bond graphs are
    being resolved into the black regular bond
    graphs.

36
Conclusions II
  • The new approach to dealing with mass flows
    offers a compact and fairly intuitive vehicle for
    describing convective flows in an
    object-oriented, physically correct manner.
  • Model wrapping techniques shall be introduced at
    a later time to offer a yet more intuitive user
    interface.
  • The capacitive fields describe the properties of
    fluids. As of now, the only fluids that have
    been described are air, water, and water vapor.
  • In the future, more capacitive fields shall be
    added to the library, e.g. for the description of
    different classes of industrial oils as well as
    different types of glycols.

37
References I
  • Greifeneder, J. and F.E. Cellier (2001),
    Modeling convective flows using bond graphs,
    Proc. ICBGM01, Intl. Conference on Bond Graph
    Modeling and Simulation, Phoenix, Arizona, pp.
    276 284.
  • Greifeneder, J. and F.E. Cellier (2001),
    Modeling multi-phase systems using bond graphs,
    Proc. ICBGM01, Intl. Conference on Bond Graph
    Modeling and Simulation, Phoenix, Arizona, pp.
    285 291.
  • Greifeneder, J. and F.E. Cellier (2001),
    Modeling multi-element systems using bond
    graphs, Proc. ESS01, European Simulation
    Symposium, Marseille, France, pp. 758 766.

38
References II
  • Greifeneder, J. (2001), Modellierung
    thermodynamischer Phänomene mittels Bondgraphen,
    Diploma Project, Institut für Systemdynamik und
    Regelungstechnik, University of Stuttgart,
    Germany.
  • Cellier, F.E. and A. Nebot (2005), The Modelica
    Bond Graph Library, Proc. 4th Intl. Modelica
    Conference, Hamburg, Germany, Vol.1, pp. 57-65.
  • Zimmer, D. and F.E. Cellier (2006), The Modelica
    Multi-bond Graph Library, Proc. 5th Intl.
    Modelica Conference, Vienna, Austria, Vol.2, pp.
    559-568.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com