Title: What are your lakes doing to my glaciers
1What are your lakes doing to my glaciers?
- Ben Smith
- Ian Joughin
- UW-APL polar science center
Funded by NSF grant ANT0636719, With thanks to
Helen Fricker and Bob B. and the ASAIDS project
2Background 1
124 active lakes are known in Antarctica based
ICESat repeat-track analysis More than 280 more
lakes are known to exist, but their activity
level is unknown
3Background 2
-2006-07 drainage of a pair of lakes in the Byrd
Glacier catchment was associated with a 10,
1-year speedup in glacier flow -Prior to WAIS
2009, no other concurrent lake-drainage and
velocity measurements were available
Question to be answered -Is the Byrd glacier
response typical for lake drainage
events? -What are the chances that any observed
change in glacier speed is due to an unobserved
lake drainage?
4Two interesting lakes
5Cook lakes
6Spring, 1800 GMT
7Mid summer, 2200 GMT
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Cook lake volume estimates
- Upper lake discharged 4 km3 of water in 2 years,
or about 63 m3/s - Large discharge from upper lake coincides with
much smaller filling at the lower lake - Timing of lower-lake filling uncertain by 6
months - Drainage between late 2006 and late 2008
11Upper lake
Lower lake
Potential basin?
Cook IS
Grayscale Hydro potential, Contours surface
height
12Measuring Cook Ice Shelfs dynamic response
Landsat feature tracking on Cook Ice
Shelf --Comparisons between pairs of images
320-420 days apart give 10 m/yr
resolution --Main limitations are a lack of
bedrock control points, and cloudy
conditions MAMM and ALOS SAR data also give
velocities -MAMM velocities show poor coherence,
may not be well controlled
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Lambert glacier lake
A lake beneath the Eastern tributary to Lambert
glacier drained from before 2003 until mid-2006
16Lambert glacier lake
ICESat shows 0.8 km3 drainage, ending in mid
2006. Landsat, Radarsat and ALOS velocities
available
17Recovered ice speeds
-No significant speed variation between 2000 and
2004, or between draining and drained conditions
18Conclusions
- No significant speed-up in Lambert glacier
results from a flood of 0.8 km3 over 2.5 a - Possibly reflects channel formation over longer
periods. - Possible ice-speed variations in Cook glacier
- Resulted from the largest flood seen in
Antarctica between 2003 and 2009 - Further ice speed measurements needed to confirm
ice speeds prior to 2007 - Glacier speed sensitivity to water inputs is
likely to depend on flood volume, duration, and
water distribution at the bed during the flood - More comparisons like these are need to identify
patterns with different glacier types. - Answers to previous questions
- What are your lakes doing to my glaciers?
- It depends on the glacier
- Is the Byrd glacier response typical for lake
drainage events? - No- responses depend on the glacier.
- What are the chances that any observed change in
glacier speed is due to an unobserved lake
drainage? - Small, although more observations are needed.
19Mid summer, 500 GMT