A joint JISC/NSF project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A joint JISC/NSF project

Description:

Freely Accessible Online, for Anyone, Anytime, Anywhere. 4th March 2002 ... 'Articles freely available online are more highly cited' Lawrence Nature (2001) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: transtec
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A joint JISC/NSF project


1
A joint JISC/NSF project
2
Contents
  • Self-archiving
  • Whats important?
  • Self-archiving
  • Budapest Open Access Initiative
  • When the (refereed) Literature is Freed
  • Academic CVs
  • Improved Searching
  • Analysis
  • Summary

3
Whats important?
  • Access most critical to users
  • Impact most critical to authors
  • Quality important to research
  • Anything else is optional

4
Self-archiving in one Sentence
  • All the Refereed,
  • Published Literature,
  • Freely Accessible Online,
  • for Anyone,
  • Anytime,
  • Anywhere

5
Why self-archiving?
  • Emphasises access (and hence impact)
  • Rapid dissemination
  • Articles freely available online are more highly
    cited Lawrence Nature (2001)
  • Level playing field between institutions,
    countries, developed vs developing

6
Budapest Open Access Initiative supports
self-archiving
  • Launched February 14th 2002
  • Promoting free access to research literature
    through self-archiving and alternative publishing
    models
  • In one week over 1,000 individuals and close to
    100 organizations have signed including Library
    of Congress, the Association of Research
    Libraries, the Canadian Association of Research
    Libraries, the Australian Vice Chancellors
    Committee and a growing number of individual
    universities.
  • Backed by the Soros Open Society Institute

7
When the (refereed) Literature is Freed
  • Online Academic CVs linked to full-texts in
    institutional Eprint Archives
  • Universal searching
  • New impact indicators (search ranking)
  • New digitometric analyses
  • Continuous research assessment (RAE)

8
Online Academic CVs
  • Institutional record of a researchers output
  • Provide a personal bibliography with an
    EPrints.org extract
  • Make research assessment simpler
  • (an obvious advantage to encourage authors to
    self-archive!)

9
Cross-Publisher Searching
  • Questions
  • Can I search the refereed literature with Google?
  • If I use an abstract service how do I get the
    full-text?
  • If I search an electronic journal, do I have to
    repeat my search for every electronic journal?
  • Answer
  • EPrints.org archives of refereed literature
    expose articles to Google indexing, or via OAI to
    metadata harvesters/search engines (e.g.
    arXiv.org in Scirus)

10
citebaseSearch(shameless plug for self)
  • Part of the Open Citation Project
  • Google for the refereed literature (currently
    arXiv.org )
  • Harvests Metadata using OAI-PMH
  • Provides impact (and other)-ranked search based
    on reference data extracted from arXiv.org
  • Re-exports MetadataReferences

11
Impact Indicators (citebaseSearch)
Currently 6 possible ranking criteria (will be
extended to include by Journal Impact, plus other
innovations)
12
Impact Indicators (citebaseSearch)
Ranking by how many times articles are co-cited
with oaiarXivhep-th/9905111
13
Analysis of Research(OpCit Research 2000
arXiv.org articles)
14
Analysis of Research(OpCit Research 2000
arXiv.org articles)
15
Analysis of Research(OpCit Research 2000
arXiv.org articles)
16
Research Assessment
  • (the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE)
    assesses institutional research impact nationally
    and internationally, which is then partially used
    to determine research funding)
  • EPrints.org institutional archives provide a
    record of research output
  • Federating tools can be used to assess the impact
    of that research
  • New indicators with greater coverage hits,
    assessing quality of collaborations,
  • "Why I think research access, impact and
    assessment are linked."
  • http//www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Tp/thes1.htm
    l Harnad THES (2001)

17
Summary
  • Access is essential to the user and to impact
  • Impact is essential to the author and to research
  • Quality comes from peer-review
  • Self-archiving is one way to achieve universal
    access to the peer-reviewed literature (and is
    possible now with EPrints.org software)
  • Anything else can be built on the freed, online
    refereed literature
  • CVs, Searching, gateways, analysis,

18
Resources
  • Slides http//opcit.eprints.org/talks/glasgow/tim
    spicture.ppt
  • Tim Brody (University of Southampton)
  • tdb01r_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk
  • CiteBase Search
  • http//citebase.eprints.org/
  • Open Citation Project
  • http//opcit.eprints.org/
  • OpCit Papers Research
  • http//opcit.eprints.org/opcitpapers.shtml
  • Self-archiving FAQ (Stevan Harnad)
  • http//www.eprints.org/self-faq/
  • Budapest Open Access Initiative
  • http//www.soros.org/openaccess/
  • Free Online Scholarship (Peter Suber)
  • http//www.earlham.edu/peters/fos/index.htm
  • Open Archives Initiative (OAI-PMH, federating
    services, etc.)
  • http//www.openarchives.org/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com