Modelling the effects of the Common Agricultural Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Modelling the effects of the Common Agricultural Policy

Description:

aggregation hides a lot of costs (insights in potatoes or fruits and vegetable) ... Oil seeds. Forest. Manufactures. Services. http://gem.sciences-po.fr ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Messe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modelling the effects of the Common Agricultural Policy


1
Modelling the effects of the Common Agricultural
Policy
  • Patrick A. Jomini
  • Groupe dEconomie Mondiale (GEM)
  • Association of Swedish Chambers of Commerce
  • The German Marshall Fund of the United States
  • Groupe dEconomie Mondiale (GEM), Paris
  • Brussels, 23 June 2009

2
  • Patrick Jomini is Assistant Commissioner at the
    Productivity Commission (PC) in Australia, and he
    is currently Senior Visiting Research Fellow at
    Groupe dEconomie Mondiale, Paris (GEM). This
    work has involved several colleagues across both
    organizations and he would like to acknowledge
    Pierre Boulanger (GEM) as well as Xiao-guang
    Zhang, our main modeller, Catherine Costa and
    Michelle Osborne (PC) for their invaluable
    contributions to this and the broader project.
  • A paper will be available soon on the GMF website
    http//www.gmfus.org and on the GEM website
    http//gem.sciences-po.fr

3
Outline
  • Effects of the CAP on the EU
  • Many transfers, inequities and costs
  • Effects on the French economy
  • Many transfers, inequities and costs
  • Effects of liberalization
  • All these costs can be avoided,
  • and if you want to know what liberalizing the CAP
    means, you can use the cost estimates provided in
    this presentation they become benefits!!
  • Framework what did we do?
  • CAP policies modeled, GTAP model, 2007
  • But lower bound because
  • increased market access in the US and other world
    markets not assessed
  • aggregation hides a lot of costs (insights in
    potatoes or fruits and vegetable).

4
Benefits, costs and transfers
  • Benefits Assess against Treaty Art 33
  • Net costs Allocative efficiency
  • Transfers to supported EU farm sector

5
Simple example of inequity EU border protection
Farm
Food
6
Step 1. Results at the EU level
  • Resource allocation. There is no free lunch
  • Within a country, you protect a sector to the
    detriment of the rest of the economy.
  • Countries being a bunch of sectors, you favor
    some EU countries to the detriment of the others
    ? EU15 vs. NMS.
  • Efficiency costs
  • CAP lowers world farm and food prices
  • Urban Africans get cheaper baguettes, incomes of
    rural Africans fall as the price of their output
    falls
  • Efficient meat and dairy producers curtail
    production
  • CAUTION! What follows assumes no change in US
    farm policy or in any other policy in the rest of
    the world.
  • So market access restricted

7
Tensions between Member States ( changes in EU
output, 2007)
Opposite effects
Similar but unequal effects
8
Tensions between sectors ( changes in EU
output, 2007)
gt70 of the economy!!!
9
Efficiency and welfare effects
10
Step 2. Digging deeper France
  • Border protection lower than EU average Have
    the French worked for the King of Prussia?
  • Allocation effects. The CAP works against French
    comparative advantages
  • in large crops potatoes
  • in diversity (a wide range of varieties) fruits
    and vegetable
  • Overall

11
Average border protection France vs. the EU ()
Farm
Food
12
Reallocation distortions ( changes in French
output, 2007)
Manufactures
Fruit, veg
Livestock
Oil seeds
Services
Forest
Crops
Food
13
Efficiency and welfare losses France, 2007
14
The French potato story
  • 3 per cent of agricultural output
  • 11 per cent of fruit and vegetables
  • no direct payments, weak border protection
  • The CAP reduces the area devoted to potato
    farming in France by 8 to 17
  • A similar story is likely for several other fruit
    and vegetables.

15
Liberalizing the CAP
  • If you want to know what liberalizing the CAP
    might mean, you can use these cost estimates
  • They become benefits!!
  • But lower bound because omitted
  • Increased market access in the US and other
    markets

16
Concluding thoughts
  • Resources are misallocated
  • across sectors and Member States in the EU
  • within Member States, including in France
  • Sectors farms treated very unequally
  • despite changing criteria for entitlements
  • Border protection main source of distortions
  • to the detriment of many farmers
  • in favor of food producers
  • Increasing decoupled payments in NMS will
    contribute to maintaining an agricultural sector
    that is too large
  • Impact on the rest of the world
  • Remember African producers...

17
Thank You for Your Attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com