NLC Phase and Timing Distribution System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

NLC Phase and Timing Distribution System

Description:

... device '8 channel alarm clock' ... custom ASIC: Solves speed problem but has ... Timing System R D Schedule and Costs. 16. Next Linear Collider. Timing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: nich68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NLC Phase and Timing Distribution System


1
NLC Phase and Timing Distribution System
  • Dorel Bernstein, Eugene Cisneros, David Brown,
    Mike Browne, Josef Frisch, Duane Thompson

Josef Frisch
2
Timing System Issues Overview
  • System is critical to NLC operation
  • System requirements are state of the art.
  • Primary risks are technical, system cost is 20M
  • RD is underway, first generation prototypes
    being tested.
  • Various technical options exist

3
Timing System Functional Requirements
  • Provide a time reference for machine triggers
  • Trigger timing accuracy lt5 picoseconds
  • Trigger step 2.8 or 1.4 nanoseconds (normal
    trigger)
  • Provide a phase reference for the accelerator RF
  • lt20º X band required 5 picoseconds
  • lt0.3º X band desirable 75 femptoseconds
  • System length 30 Kilometers ? 1?10-9 stability
    desired
  • High reliability required
  • Global system ? Machine Protection issues

4
Timing System Technical Issues
  • Stability
  • Required stability ( 5?10-8) would require
    impractical lt0.01C Temperature stability for
    copper or fiber
  • Phase stable fibers would require 0.1C stability
    - still very difficult for multi-kilometer runs
  • Desired stability (for 0.3º X-band) is a factor
    of 100 more difficult.
  • Need to use feedback to control effective fiber
    length
  • Reliability
  • This system is critical to all accelerator
    operations
  • Global system failure could cause damage due to
    beam energy.
  • Need fully redundant system.

5
Timing System Baseline Technical Choices
  • Use fiber optics for distribution
  • Lower loss than coax
  • Lower cost than coax
  • Better VSWR available (important for feedback
    scheme)
  • Thermal timing coefficient similar (due to index
    change in fiber)
  • Noise in fibers much worse than coax for similar
    power
  • Fix with local narrow band PLLs
  • Machine Protection Each receiver a narrow band
    VCXO PLL
  • Remembers phase between pulses - prevents
    sudden global phase shift
  • Feedback Scheme
  • Use signal reflected from far end of fiber to
    measure phase delay, then adjust laser wavelength
    ?(dispersion)? fiber delay length.
  • Requires point to point system (to each sector)

6
Timing Distribution System Block Diagram
7
Redundant Timing Distribution System
8
Timing System Baseline Design / Cost
  • Electronics
  • Use commercial DFB diode laser (1550nm) with
    temperature tuning for fiber length feedback
  • Use standard telecom integrated optics and
    receivers
  • Fix phase noise with narrow band phase locked
    loops
  • VXI format electronics assumed for costing
  • Distribution
  • Use standard telecom single mode fiber (SMF28)
  • Temperature controlled trench to reduce required
    feedback range
  • Full redundant design - single point failure
    resistant
  • Costing
  • Bottoms up baseline done 20M

9
Timing System RD issues
  • System performance requirement is substantially
    beyond current state of the art Stability 40?
    SLAC Drive Line
  • System is critical to NLC operation
  • Technical questions
  • Use of reflected signal for precision phase
    measurement
  • Use of thermally tuned laser diodes
  • Performance of local PLLs is marginal
  • Trench temperature control performance not well
    understood
  • Optional designs to be considered
  • Length control with additional temperature
    controlled fiber (temperature of additional fiber
    moves in the opposite direction)
  • Alternate tunable laser designs

10
Fallback Technology Choices
11
Timing System RD to date
  • Demonstration of wavelength control of fiber
    phase length
  • Can compensate for a few ?C fiber temperature
  • Length change is smooth (but not uniform) at the
    1 X-Band level
  • Used Fabry Perot (not Distributed FeedBack)
    laser
  • Demonstration of acceptable phase noise through
    fiber
  • Phase noise OK with 100Hz PLL (devices available
    at this spec)
  • Test used only a 2.2Km fiber - 15Km to be tested
    with new laser
  • Full fiber phase transmission prototype under
    construction
  • Should allow testing of all critical parameters
  • System being debugged Many engineering issues
  • interference, VSWR, etc.
  • Feedback loop closes - but performance is limited
    by laser bandwidth. (should be fixed with DFB
    laser)

12
Timing System RD Fiber system
  • Continue testing of prototype systems
  • Demonstrate required performance, or understand
    limitation
  • Test alternate designs if prototype fails
  • Use temperature controlled additional fiber
  • Evaluate precision temperature control of trench
  • Evaluate electronic phase shifter
  • Use high frequency RF fiber transmission to
    reduce noise
  • Test alternate optical systems (special projects
    group)
  • Grating tuned, Multi-element DFB, Erbium based,
    etc.
  • Communications DWDM laser development is
    applicable
  • Evaluate physics limits
  • Stimulated Brillouin Scattering significant at
    10mw input
  • Polarization effects not well understood
  • Transfer technology to Controls prototypes

13
Timing System RD Electronics
  • Count down device 8 channel alarm clock
    Options
  • Use Programmable logic (e.g. Xilinx) Current
    parts too slow.
  • Semi-custom ASIC Solves speed problem but has
    additional design cost.
  • Full custom ASIC Can be radiation-hard. Highest
    design cost. current baseline.
  • Module / system design
  • Fiducial transmission. baseline design
  • Possible pattern transmission.
  • Module design / prototype
  • Control system interface (baseline design is
    VXI)
  • Firmware and Software development.
  • Most work performed after CDR.

14
Critical RD Milestones
  • System functional description January 2000
  • Prototype demonstrating minimum required
    performance April 2001
  • Laser selection January 2002
  • Prototype demonstrating full performance June
    2002
  • This is the last significant technical risk item
  • Prototype ASIC (if used) tested June 2002
  • If an ASIC is not used, then finish prototype
    programmable logic based unit.
  • Full prototype system, ready for DFM July 2004

15
Timing System RD Schedule and Costs
16
Timing System Status Summary
  • This is a very difficult problem - beyond current
    state of the art.
  • Component tests are encouraging for phase noise
  • Feedback scheme looks promising - but not yet
    demonstrated
  • Prototype system being tested
  • Several alternate RD paths if problems develop
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com