Data Quality Control - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Data Quality Control

Description:

Validation at time of data entry. Error Checking and Analysis after submission ... Weekday/ weekend studies. Solution: provide as accurate as possible ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: jmu88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Data Quality Control


1
Data Quality ControlCommon ErrorsMark Gibbs
Reporting 2006Emissions Inventories
2
Presentation Outline
  • Validation at time of data entry
  • Error Checking and Analysis after submission
  • Error Correction Process
  • Most common (and easily
  • avoidable) errors

3
Data Validation
  • Validation procedures continue to tighten-up
  • Key fields are validated at time of entry
  • You must still indicate if a field is N/A
  • If a field is not completed
  • You will be unable to save data in Redbud and do
    a Final Submit
  • Detailed checks and analyses after submission

4
Complete All Data Fields
  • Substantially incorrect submissions will be
    returned to you
  • Else you will be contacted by the Emissions
    Inventory Section staff corrections can be made
    via email
  • Save time get it right the first time!

5
Update with 2006 Data
  • Dont enter last years data,turn that around
    and send it back to us!
  • Most processes do not operate
  • for exactly the same number of hours,
  • with the same annual rate, and
  • produce the same amounts of emissions
  • from year to year.

6
Update with 2006 Data
  • Key fields deliberately zero-ed out
  • Annual Process Rate
  • Annual Hours of Operation
  • Emission Amounts
  • Excess Emission Amounts
  • All these fields need to updated with ACTUAL data
    for 2006

7
The Emissions Inventory Data Hierarchy
Company gt Facility gt Point gt Process gt
Emission
Company Facility Facility Point Point Pro
cess Process Emission Emission
8
Facility Address
  • Must be a physical location
  • 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
  • 0.5 MI W of Springlake DR and MLK AVE
  • 1 MI S of SH-33 and Co Road 234
  • Not
  • Near Cushing
  • PO Box 123

9
Facility Operational Status
  • Five Options
  • 1. Active
  • 2. Idle
  • 3. Closed
  • 4. Exempt
  • 5. De Minimis

10
Closed Facilities
  • Closed Status
  • Applies only if facility has been permanently
    shut down
  • Annual Emission Inventories are not required
  • DEQ must have confirmation in writing
  • Note If the facility operated at any time during
    the calendar year
  • its status will not be changed to Closed
  • until the following year

11
Exempt De MinimisFacilities
  • As defined in OAC 252100-7-1.1
  • Emissions Inventories are not required for these
    facilities.
  • Note A facility with an existing permit cannot
    simply be declared Permit Exempt
  • The permit must be cancelled
  • by DEQ

12
Do you need to submit?
  • If we have not sent you a form or your facility
    is not in Redbud
  • The onus is still on you to ensure you are
    compliant
  • Contact us if a facility
  • has recently opened,
  • is not now permit exempt,
  • etc,
  • and we will load the relevant
  • data into Redbud

13
Facility Data
  • NAICS Code
  • TRI Facility ID
  • Dun Bradstreet Number
  • This information is required
  • We continue to tighten-up data completeness
  • So expect these fields to be checked!

14
Incorrect SIC / NAICS andSCC Assignments
  • Create errors in
  • Categorization
  • Reconciliation
  • Assignment of control and growth profiles
  • Which impacts
  • Photochemical modeling
  • Control strategy development
  • Effective and efficient application of
  • regulatory measures
  • Success of Attainment Plans

15
Point Name
  • Use as precise a name as possible
  • Should be able to distinguish from any other
    Emission Point by name only
  • Include any permit name or reference
  • e.g., EUG-3
  • Include any internal reference number
  • e.g., Tank 3210

16
Facility Point LocationData
  • Needed for
  • Cross-referencing regulatory databases
  • Geographical location of emissions
  • Ultimately need GPS data to an accuracy of 1
    meter for
  • The facility (Main Gate)
  • Each emission point

17
Stack Data Errors
  • Entering both fugitive and stack dimensions
  • Improved logic in Redbud
  • Clearer Hardcopy forms
  • Stack data not in correct units
  • Flow Rate is in acfm
  • actual cubic feet per minute
  • Gas Exit Velocity is in fps
  • feet per second

18
Missing Stack Data Fields
  • Example
  • One or more of Stack Height, Diameter, Flow Rate
    or Temperature missing
  • Creates errors in
  • Calculation of effective plume height
  • Determining pollutant dispersion

19
Missing Stack Data Fields
  • Which impacts
  • Photochemical modeling
  • Ozone studies
  • Model validation
  • Health risk assessments
  • Solution
  • Provide all stack physical
  • parameters

20
SCC Source Classification Code
  • Avoid General or miscellaneous classifications
  • SCCs ending xxxxxx99
  • Be as specific as possible
  • e.g., Compressor Engines 20200202 is not
    acceptable should be
  • 20200252 2-cycle Lean Burn
  • 20200253 4-cycle Rich Burn, etc.
  • Make sure the SCC is valid for
  • process and facility

21
SCC for Flashing Losses
  • New SCC available for reporting flashing losses
    only from hydrocarbon storage tanks
  • 40400300 Fixed Roof Tank Flashing Loss
  • Do not need to use 40400311 (Breathing Working
    Flashing) for condensate flashing losses only
  • There should be three separate
  • processes with own SCC and
  • emission amounts

22
Process Data Errors
  • Operating Rates - hourly, daily annual
  • Different definitions but same units
  • Maximum Hourly Rate
  • Typical Daily Rate
  • Actual Annual Rate
  • Rates are not in the proper units
  • Does not match actual throughput
  • Prefer units to be consistent with emission
    factor numerator units

23
Missing / Incorrect Temporal Data
  • Example Fields
  • Hours/day, days/week, weeks/year, seasonal
    operating fractions
  • Creates errors in
  • Temporal distribution of emissions

24
Missing / Incorrect Temporal Data
  • Which Impacts
  • Seasonal planning inventories
  • Photochemical modeling
  • e.g., modeling an extreme summer ozone event
  • Weekday/ weekend studies
  • Solution
  • provide as accurate as possible
  • temporal data for each process

25
Typically Under-ReportedPollutants
  • Fugitive Dust
  • Ammonia (NH3)

26
Lower Reporting Limits
  • No legally defined lower cut-off for individual
    emissions
  • intent is to be cautious and practical
  • Report individual pollutant emissions if facility
    total of that pollutant exceeds 0.1 Tons (200
    lbs)
  • Redbud accepts data down to
  • 0.001 Tons (2 lbs)

27
Fugitive Dust
  • Unpaved roads
  • Agricultural tilling
  • Construction
  • Windblown dust, Fly ash

28
Ammonia (NH3)
  • Where applicable, all facilities should report
    ammonia
  • Ammonia (NH3) emissions are often
    under-represented
  • important contributor to the formation of
    secondary fine Particulate Matter (PM)

29
Sources of NH3 Emissions
  • Emissions from industrial processes
  • Refrigeration losses
  • Combustion sources
  • Fertilizer production
  • Petroleum refining
  • Pulp and paper production

30
Best Available Data Method
  • Emissions shall be calculated using the best
    available information
  • DEQ Approved Methods only
  • Portable Emissions Analyzer results are NOT
    acceptable
  • List the most specific category
  • Must be able to demonstrate
  • Prior Approval from DEQ

31
Emission Factor Errors
  • Missing emission factor and units
  • Throughput units are inconsistent with emission
    factor units
  • e.g., rate is in MMSCF but emission factor is
    lbs/MMBTU
  • Value of emission factor does not match emission
    factor units
  • All these issues will affect replication
    calculations

32
Control Devices
  • Not reported
  • Incorrect descriptions used
  • Control efficiencies not reported
  • Effect of controls not included in reported
    emissions
  • Multiple Controls not reported or handled
    correctly

33
Missing / Incorrect Control Equipment data
  • Not completed correctly
  • Primary and secondary control device fields
  • Control efficiency field
  • Creates errors in
  • Identifying controlled vs. uncontrolled emissions
  • Identifying control equipment used

34
Missing / Incorrect Control Equipment data
  • Which can impact
  • Control strategy planning
  • Rule development
  • Solution
  • Provide correct control device information
  • and/or
  • control efficiency for each controlled pollutant

35
Emissions Calculation Errors
  • Math errors
  • Control efficiencies not handled correctly
  • Using wrong units when doing conversions
  • Be careful to report your emissions in Tons not
    pounds per year
  • - Could be a very expensive mistake!

36
How to Calculate Emissions Correctly
  • The general equation for emissions estimation is
  • E A x EF
  • Where
  • E emissions
  • A activity rate
  • EF emission factor
  • For controlled emissions this becomes
  • E A x EF x (1-ER/100)
  • Where
  • ER overall emission reduction efficiency,

37
How to ReportEmissions Correctly
  • Calculated / Measured Emissions
  • Excess Emissions
  • ACTUAL Total Emissions in
  • Tons per Year (TPY)

38
Resources Help
  • The Emissions Inventory Website

39
Resources Help
  • www.deq.state.ok.us/AQDnew/emissions
  • Rules
  • Redbud Online Help
  • Turn Around Documents
  • Instructions Help
  • General Instructions
  • Tables
  • Useful Links

40
Resources Help
  • www.deq.state.ok.us/AQDnew/emissions
  • Emissions Inventory FAQs
  • Workshop Presentations Training Materials
  • How to Contact Us!

41
EPAs CHIEF Web Site
  • Clearing House for Inventories Emissions
    Factors
  • www.epa.gov/ttn/chief

42
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief
43
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief
  • Published National Emissions Inventories
  • Emissions Factors
  • Software
  • Basic Information and General Training

44
Questions?
  • Also dont forget the
  • feedback form!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com