Discussion on Interferometer Diagnostics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Discussion on Interferometer Diagnostics

Description:

We need an achievable, prioritized list of measurements to make on each channel. Wish list: ... How to make a veto? Actual vetoes will be search specific ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: peterrs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Discussion on Interferometer Diagnostics


1
Discussion on Interferometer Diagnostics
  • Gabriela Gonzalez and Peter Saulson
  • LSC, 17 March 2001

LIGO-G010140-00-D
2
Why Interferometer Diagnostics?
  • To learn criteria to reject an apparent
    gravitational wave signal as an instrumental
    artifact.
  • (Of course, coincidences between interferometers
    are also very powerful!)

3
Goals of this discussion
  • 1) Share ideas on strategies across UL groups
  • 2) Find common aspects of plans, especially for
    the work that is preparatory for E6
  • 3) Set up work plan, with shared labor, if
    possible.

4
Common ideas
  • 1) List of key diagnostic channels
  • 2) Homework to do before E6
  • 3) Constructing vetoes
  • 4) Using vetoes
  • 5) Diagnostic software

5
Common idea 1List of key diagnostic channels
  • Internal ifo signals and PEM signals
  • Inspiral group already has a draft list
  • (It is long, could use prioritizing.)
  • Signals will be handled differently,
  • depending on strength of transfer function
    between measured variable and GW channel

6
Common idea 2Homework due before E6
  • We need an achievable, prioritized list of
    measurements to make on each channel.
  • Wish list
  • transfer function to GW channel
  • measured, calculated, or estimated
  • noise level, spectrum, stationarity/gaussianity,
    cross-correlation with GW channel
  • spectral lines (strength, stationarity, )
  • non-linear saturation, lock loss, bilinear noise

7
Common idea 3 How to make a veto?
  • Actual vetoes will be search specific
  • At future discussions, look for commonalities

8
Common idea 4How to use vetoes
  • Probably pretty similar for time-domain searches
    (inspiral and burst)
  • generate (search-specific) veto channel
  • re-examine diagnostic channels after
    identification of candidate signals
  • relation to coincidence test
  • which is more powerful/useful?
  • applied in which order?
  • How similar in freq.-domain searches?

9
Common idea 5Diagnostic software
  • DMT monitors that are almost ready
  • UL groups and DetChar Group need to talk more to
    refine list, give each other feedback
  • New monitors
  • LDAS/LAL code
  • post-processing code
  • and ?

10
Coordinating our work
  • Who is available for these tasks?
  • How to organize?
  • individuals babysit particular channels?
  • How to coordinate work?
  • across Upper Limit groups
  • with Detector Characterization
  • visits to sites!
  • How to document results in usable form?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com