CeLLS Collaborative eLearning in Life Sciences www'cellsproject'org - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 5
About This Presentation
Title:

CeLLS Collaborative eLearning in Life Sciences www'cellsproject'org

Description:

(Adam Smith, Bell, Dundee, Forth Valley & James Watt) Scottish Qualifications Authority ... Create a set of resources for common subject areas in levels 7 and 8 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: wendynig
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CeLLS Collaborative eLearning in Life Sciences www'cellsproject'org


1
CeLLSCollaborative eLearning in Life
Scienceswww.cellsproject.org
  • Napier University
  • Interactive University
  • Scottish Colleges Biotechnology Consortium(Adam
    Smith, Bell, Dundee, Forth Valley James Watt)
  • Scottish Qualifications Authority
  • University of Dundee

2
eTransformation Strategy
  • eTransformation
  • Means different things to different Partners
  • Commonality move away from lectures as the main
    mode of information delivery toward a more
    student centred approach (tutor supported or
    independent learning). Blended learning.
  • Strategy
  • Create a set of resources for common subject
    areas in levels 7 and 8 across the consortium
    (approx. 60)
  • Create institutional specific materials
    (approx. 30)

3
Stage 1 Progress Main Products
  • Curriculum Design
  • Core resources identified described (v1.0)
  • Learning Design Pedagogy (v0.2 draft)
  • Technical
  • Requirements for Metadata, QTI and SCORM 1.2
    packages
  • Core Materials
  • Authors completed Phase 1 Training
  • Roles, responsibilities, workflow for
    collaborative authoring defined (15 strong team)
  • Institutional Specific Materials POSTPONED
  • Communications Dissemination
  • Mostly inward-facing to inform and engage
    colleagues
  • Evaluation
  • Baseline
  • Specific Staff and Student attitudes (Napier with
    others to follow)
  • Transformation
  • Early days forming an understanding of meaning
    and impact for each Partner

4
Stage 1 Progress Main Outcomes
  • Iterative way of working
  • plan-do-review-refine
  • Understanding of the inherent differences between
    colleges and universities
  • Approach to teaching
  • Breadth of student intake and social inclusion
  • Institutional culture
  • Building an openness for sharing materials
  • Understand the difference between Quality Control
    and Evaluation

5
Challenges Stage 2 and beyond
  • Deliver
  • 1. Curriculum Design Process Capture
  • 2. Technical - Development
  • 3. Core Material Authoring Development
  • Begin
  • 4. Institutional Specific Materials
  • Strengthen
  • 5. Communications Dissemination
  • 6. Evaluation
  • 7. Transformation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com