Measuring the Quality of Health Care Providers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring the Quality of Health Care Providers

Description:

Be sure that you have R and not just R1. Regression analysis requires certain assumptions ... Journal of Health Economics 18:747-67. McClellan, Newhouse. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: alexand111
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring the Quality of Health Care Providers


1
Measuring the Quality of Health Care Providers
  • Alexander C. Tsai
  • HSR Symposium Measuring and Improving the
    Quality of Health Care Services
  • March 30, 2004

2
A Motivating Example
  • Yij ßjXij ?ij
  • Y 1 if patient i died in hospital j
  • X hospital indicators

3
Importance of Risk Adjustment in Assessing Quality
  • In 1986, HCFA released mortality figures on 5,750
    Medicare provider hospitals
  • Average mortality rate 22.5
  • 142 had death rates significantly higher than
    average
  • One hospital had mortality rate 87.6

4
Importance of Risk Adjustment in Assessing Quality
  • In 1986, HCFA released mortality figures on 5,750
    Medicare provider hospitals
  • Average mortality rate 22.5
  • 142 had death rates significantly higher than
    average
  • One hospital had mortality rate 87.6
  • Turned out to be a hospice

5
A Motivating Example
  • Yij ?Rij ßjXij ?ij
  • Y 1 if patient i died in hospital j
  • X hospital indicators
  • R case mix variables from administrative data
    (R1) and clinical data (R2)
  • R R1 R2

6
Does X Cause Y?
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?R ßX ?
X should not be correlated with ?
7
Omitted Variable Bias
  • R Entire universe of case mix variables
  • R R1 R2 R3
  • R1 Fitting a risk adjustment model to
    administrative data yields c0.60
  • R2 Clinical data is better (c0.85) but much
    more expensive
  • You want R, but you only have R1

8
Does X Cause Y?
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?R ßX ?
X should not be correlated with ?
9
Omitted Variable Bias
R2
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?1R1 ßX ?
? ? ?R2
10
Solution 1 Better Data
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?1R1 ?2R2 ßX ?
11
Solution 1 Better Data
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?1R1 ?2R2 ßX ?
(but what about R3?)
12
Solution 2 Better MethodsRandomized, Controlled
Trial
Coin Toss
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ßX ?
13
Solution 3 Better MethodsInstrumental Variables
(IV)
Distance (IV)
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?1R1 ßX ?
X dD ?
14
Solution 3 Better MethodsInstrumental Variables
(IV)
Distance (IV)
ß
Hospital
Outcome
Y ?1R1 ßX ?
X dD ?
15
Other Examples
16
Conclusions
  • Measuring quality is a perilous undertaking
  • Must have good risk adjustment
  • Be sure that you have R and not just R1
  • Regression analysis requires certain assumptions
  • If you cant get better data, then you must
    invoke stronger assumptions
  • Instrumental variables is one possibility

17
Bibliography
  • McClellan, McNeil, Newhouse. Does more intensive
    treatment of AMI in the elderly reduce mortality?
    Journal of the American Medical Association
    272859-66.
  • Zohoori, Savitz. Econometric approaches to
    epidemiologic data. Annals of Epidemiology
    7251-7.
  • Gowrisankaran, Town. Estimating the quality of
    care in hospitals using instrumental variables.
    Journal of Health Economics 18747-67.
  • McClellan, Newhouse. Overview of the special
    supplement issue. Health Services Research
    351061-9.
  • Angrist, Kreuger. Instrumental variables and the
    search for identifcation. Journal of Economic
    Perspectives 1569-85.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com