Leading Collaboratively - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Leading Collaboratively

Description:

National Conference for College Women Student Leaders. University of Maryland ... Holt, NY: Rinehart and Winston. Mullane, S. P. (1999) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Julie226
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leading Collaboratively


1
Leading Collaboratively
  • National Conference for College Women Student
    Leaders
  • University of Maryland
  • Christy Anthony, Julie Mills, Andrew
    Toczydlowski, Emily Whelden

2
  • Check In
  • What brought you here today?
  • What bring us, as presenters, here today?

3
Background Models of Student Leadership/ Identity
4
Student Development TheoryKohlbergs Stages of
Moral Development
  • Pre-Conventional
  • Morality is judged by its direct consequences
    solely concerned with the self in an egocentric
    manner
  • Stage I obedience and punishment driven
  • Stage II self-interest driven
  • Conventional
  • Morality is judged by comparing ones actions to
    societys views and expectations
  • Stage III interpersonal accord and conformity
    driven
  • Stage IV authority and social order and
    obedience driven
  • Post-Conventional
  • There is a growing realization that individuals
    are separate entities from society, and that the
    individuals own perspective may take precedence
    over societys views
  • Stage V social contract driven
  • Stage VI universal ethical principles driven

5
Gilligans Model of Womens Moral Development
  • Men tend to morally reason in the justice
    voice whereas women do so in the care voice
    because of womens concern with others
    well-being (Pascarella Terernzini, 43).
  • Three Stages
  • Level I Orientation to Individual Survival
  • Level II Goodness as Self-Sacrifice
  • Level III The Morality of Nonviolence

6
Educative Judicial ProcessesFairness,
Educational Value and Moral Development (Mullane,
1999)
  • Students perceptions of disciplinary process
    fair and/or educational?
  • Relationship of perception with moral development
  • Findings
  • Process had educational value and was fair
  • Perception of fairness contributed little to
    moral development
  • The higher the level of moral development, the
    more likely students perceived educational value
  • Students scoring lower on DIT are less likely to
    change their behavior
  • Limitation Only 5 of the 73 participants were
    female
  • Recommendation Student Affairs professionals
    should implement moral development training into
    judicial processes

7
Perceived Learning and Anticipated Future
Behaviors (Howell, 2005)
  • Perceived learning and future behavior of college
    students going through judicial process
  • Results Students will
  • Think about the consequences of their actions in
    the future
  • Increased empathy and thought about how their
    actions would affect others
  • Better able to understand the reasoning behind
    various policies and procedures
  • Most said that they would not repeat their
    specific behavior or would be more careful in the
    future
  • Conclusion Sanctions should encourage outcomes
    of three results

8
Works Cited
  • Howell, M. T. (2005). Students' perceived
    learning and anticipated future behaviors as a
    result of participation in the student judicial
    process Electronic version. Journal of College
    Student Development, 46(4), 374-392.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and
    moralization The cognitive-developmental
    approach. Moral Development and Behavior Theory,
    Research and Social Issues. Holt, NY Rinehart
    and Winston.
  • Mullane, S. P. (1999). Fairness, educational
    values, and moral development in the student
    disciplinary process Electronic version. NASPA
    Journal, 36(2), 86-95.
  • Pascarella, E.T. Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How
    college affects students San Francisco, CA
    Jossey-Bass.

9
Model of Student Advocates
10
Types of Student Advocates
  • Revolutionary
  • Facilitator
  • Pushover

11
Characteristics of a Revolutionary Leader
  • Go to the students
  • Take charge
  • Want to fight
  • Start strong
  • Dont trust administrators
  • Bring havoc
  • Less mature, dont understand the whole picture
  • Only understand their point of view

12
Characteristics of a Facilitator
  • Seeks to find different opinions
  • Listens first open to hearing other views before
    making a change
  • Seeks to get all power players in the same
    place/room
  • Compromise
  • Lead group discussions
  • Tries to please everyone
  • Sees the good/ bad in change and tradition
  • Sets small goals sees change as incremental
  • Understands multiple sides of the issue
  • Trusts some administrators and seeks their
    assistance

13
Characteristics of a Pushover
  • Crowd Pleaser
  • Seeks to Impress
  • One Step Out the Door sees leadership as a way
    to boost their resume
  • Annoyed by the revolutionary
  • Rarely sees students point of view
  • Annoyed by revolutionaries
  • Wants to get ahead
  • Not apt/ open to change stays constant
  • Have no views of their own

14
Working with the Different Leaders
  • Revolutionary
  • Want to be heard Listen First
  • Understand that they do not trust administrators/
    student leaders work to build their trust
  • Let them hear the other points of view and be
    open to their responses
  • Remember Their first response is to fight!
    Try to let them cool down and know the other
    views before they start a revolution.

15
Working with the Different Leaders
  • Facilitator
  • Let them come to you
  • Provide them with plenty of knowledge and
    information on the issue
  • Point them in the direction of different
    resources
  • Be open to meeting with them and other key
    community members to discuss the different topics
  • Remember Sometimes their ideas are lost in the
    process and other views take hold. Make sure
    they do not move into the pushover role or forget
    their potential for change.

16
Working with the Different Leaders
  • Pushover
  • Start a Conversation Seek them Out
  • They may tend to avoid conflict situations so
    stay on common ground
  • Let them see the facilitator at work shows that
    conflict doesnt have to be negative
  • Remember They are a flight risk! They may see
    the best way out of the situation as giving in
    to the other side. Allow them the opportunity,
    in a safe environment, to voice their own
    concerns. Also, understand that sometimes they
    may be right!

17
Complexities of Leaders
  • Students tend to lean towards one of the
    leadership styles
  • Students also must adapt and change their styles
    to be successful
  • For example After meeting with administrators
    and understanding their views, you still disagree
    with their point of view. You see that
    administrators are turned off and dont want to
    listen. Thus, you change your tactics and go to
    the students. Or, you realize that by bringing
    up this issue and trying to produce change you
    are aggravating the administration and hindering
    the possibility of support for one of your main
    concerns.

18
Model of Student Leaders
Revolutionary
Issue
Facilitator
Result
Pushover
19
Creating Win-Win Situations Out of Conflict
20
Conflict
  • An expressed struggle between at least two
    interdependent parties who perceive incompatible
    goals, scarce resources, and interference from
    others in achieving their goals.
  • Things to Remember
  • Conflict is not necessarily bad or negative
  • Conflict is often a pre-cursor to better
    relationships with more open communication and
    good resolutions to existing problems.

21
Reframing Conflict
22
Sources of Conflict (adapted from Moore)
23
Making it a Win-Win Victory Over Zero-Sum
  • Resist the assumption that conflict bad.
  • Put the problem over there.
  • Ask genuinely inquisitive questions.
  • Agree to methods of decision-making/data
    analysis, etc.
  • Find shared values.
  • Focus on (shared interests), not conflicting
    positions.
  • Assume the best motives in others.
  • Take small steps to fix the relationship.
  • Look to the future, not the past.

24
References
  • Moore, C.W. (2003). The Mediation Process
    Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San
    Francisco Jossey-Bass.

25
Breakout Groups
  • Housing and Residence Life Issues
  • Code of Conduct
  • LGBTQ Issues
  • Womens Issues

26
Your Task Develop an Action Plan!
  • Key issues for administrators and students
  • Short term and long term goals
  • Your resources
  • Potential obstacles

27
Tips for Success Part I
  • Dont be too professional be a student!
  • Meet outside the office
  • Casual stop-ins are good
  • Anger and outright protest should have limited
    application
  • Tap into other student leaders
  • Be a regular person
  • Pick your fights
  • Consider strategic choices
  • Talk to the most receptive
  • Present in a group setting

28
Tips for Success Part II
  • Relate as a person
  • Seek a middle ground but know your bottom line
  • Set a goal, observe the situation, analyze from
    positive/negative
  • Balance how much you want to pushback
  • Find points of agreement, see the next little
    steps
  • Find allies and use them for coaching,
    brainstorming, support and empowerment. Do not
    expect them to yell at their boss or subordinate,
    especially in front of you.
  • Have regular meetings
  • Do your own homework
  • Remember Most administrators like students or
    else they wouldnt be here

29
Questions??
  • Christy Anthony (anthony_at_american.edu)
  • Andrew Toczydlowski (toczydlo_at_american.edu)
  • Emily Whelden (ew3977a_at_student.american.edu)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com