Pulsar Emission Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Pulsar Emission Models

Description:

Fermi will be able to measure spectral index and exponential cutoff vs. phase ... Fermi has so far detected about 48 g-ray pulsars - including ms pulsars many ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: AliceH
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pulsar Emission Models


1
Pulsar Emission Models
Alice Harding
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
2
Force-free magnetosphere
Goldreich Julian 1969
  • In vacuum E gtgt Fgrav at NS surface
  • Vacuum conditions (Deutsch 1955) cannot exist!
  • If charge supply creates force-free conditions,
  • Goldreich-Julian charge density
  • Corotating dipole field
  • NO particle acceleration

3
Possible sites of particle acceleration
Ideal MHD in most of magnetosphere
Deficient charge supply acceleration
Solve Poissons Eqn
4
Accelerators and global models
Accelerator gaps
Global currents
Charges (ee-)
5
Polar Cap Pair Formation Front (SCLF)
e-
  • Curvature radiation pair front
  • complete screening

e
  • Inverse Compton scattering pair front
  • incomplete screening

Closed field region
6
Slot gap model
  • Pair-free zone near last open field-line
  • (Arons 1983, Muslimov Harding 2003,
    2004)
  • Slower acceleration
  • Pair formation front at higher altitude
  • Slot gap forms between conducting walls
  • E acceleration is not screened

SR
7
Which pulsars have slot gaps?
Harding Muslimov 2002
Only the younger pulsars above the death line for
production of curvature radiation pairs will have
SLOT GAPS
SLOT GAPS
NO SLOT GAPS Pair starved
Older pulsars below the death line for production
of curvature radiation pairs will have unscreened
E and NO SLOT GAPS
?
8
Polar cap pair cascades
Magnetic pair production Threshold eth
mc2/sinq Spectral attenuation is
super-exponential
SR
CR
ICS
kT
Mp 102 - 105
Mp lt 10
  • Daugherty Harding 1982
  • Zhang Harding 2000
  • Sturner Dermer 1994
  • Hibschmann Arons 2001

9
Pair production spectral cutoff
10
Measuring spectral cutoffs
Super-exponential (PC) or exponential cutoff (OG)
?
Is there a real EC vs. B0 trend?
11
Vela Phase-averaged spectrum
Consistent with b1 (simple exponential)
b2 (super-exponential) rejected at 16.5s
No evidence for magnetic pair attenuation Near-su
rface emission ruled out
Abdo et al. 2009
12
Fermi pulsars what have we learned?
  • Young pulsars
  • Majority have double g-ray peaks with phase
    separation 0.2 0.5
  • g-ray peaks are not aligned with radio peak(s)
  • g-ray beams are must larger that radio beams
  • Spectra are power-laws with simple exponential
    cutoffs
  • High-energy emission comes from the outer
    magetosphere
  • Millisecond pulsars (C. Venters talk)
  • most g-ray peak(s) lag radio peak(s)
    pair screening OG/SG gap emission
  • some g-ray peak(s) lead radio peak(s)
    pair-starved polar cap emission

13
Relativistic Effects
  • Aberration
  • Time-of-flight delays
  • Magnetic field retardation

14
Caustic emission
Morini 1983, Romani
Yadigaroglu 1995
  • Particles radiate along last open field line from
    polar cap to light cylinder
  • Time-of-flight, aberration and phase delay cancel
    on trailing edge emission from many
    altitudes arrive in phase caustic peaks
    in light curve

15
Formation of caustics
16
Formation of caustics
  • Emission on trailing field lines
  • Bunches in phase
  • Arrives at inertial observer simultaneously
  • Emission on leading field lines
  • Spreads out in phase
  • Arrives at inertial observer at different times
  • Caustic emission
  • Dipole magnetic field
  • Outer edge of open volume

17
Elba caustics
18
Sky distribution of intensity
a 300
a 600
a 900
Slot gap
Observer angle
Outer gap
Phase
19
Slot gap and outer gap geometry
Slot gap
Dyks Rudak 2003 Dyks, Harding Rudak 2004
20
Slot gap and outer gap geometry
outer gap
Romani Yadigaroglu 1995 Cheng, Ruderman Zhang
2000 Dyks, Harding Rudak 2004
No off pulse emission in traditional OG model
21
Slot gap particle acceleration and radiation
Resonant absorption of radio photons
when (Lyubarski Petrova 1998)
W
ee- pairs
primary e-
22
Crab pulsar Model profiles
a 450, z 1000
Harding et al. 2008
X-rays from pairs
g-rays from primaries
Observer Angle z
Radio cone emission
Phase
23
Phase-averaged spectrum
Harding et al. 2008
Fermi
Correlations with radio variability only below
200 MeV
Primary CR
Pair SR
Primary SR
Simple exponential cutoff of CR spectrum
Kuiper et al. 2000
Primary ICS
24
(New) Outer gap model
Hirotani 2006, Takata et al. 2006
Outer gap exists below the null surface visible
emission from both poles More like extended slot
gap!
Improved profile for Crab
25
Outer gap model spectra
Crab pulsar
Takata et al. 2007
Primary ICS
Primary CR
Pair SR
26
Emission from a striped pulsar wind
Kirk Petri 2005
Assumed size of dissipation region
27
What we can learn from phase-resolved spectroscopy
  • Fermi will be able to measure spectral index and
    exponential cutoff vs. phase for the bright
    pulsars
  • Outer magnetosphere models map phase to emission
    radius and radius of curvature
  • Can map particle acceleration energy and electric
    field with emission radius
  • Potentially very powerful model discriminator

28
Magnetic field lines projected in observer angle
vs. phase plane
TPC
Outer gap
Phase
29
Emission radius vs. phase in SG and OG models
Dyks, Harding Rudak 2004
In both SG and OG models, emission at each phase
comes from small radius range
See also Cheng et al. 2000
Maximum emission radius
Minimum emission radius
Romani 1996
30
Emission radius vs. phase for other a and z
1.0
z 60o
0.8
z 70o
0.6
r/rLC
0.4
0.2
0.0
31
Mapping particle energy to emission radius
Continuous acceleration in gap -gt particles
reach radiation reaction limit
  • Balance CR losses with acceleration gain
  • Steady-state Lorentz factor
  • Curvature radiation peak energy

32
Vela energy dependent profiles
  • P3 shifts to higher phase with energy
  • P1/P2 decreases with energy
  • Explained in slot gap model if
  • and E r1/2 decreases with r/rLC

Emission radius lt 0.95 r/rLC
lt 0.8 r/rLC
lt 0.6 r/rLC
Abdo et al. 2009
Energy dependence of light curves map
acceleration in magnetosphere!
33
Peak separations and radio lags
Watters et al. 2009
Good model discriminator
34
Global models
Contopoulos, Kazanas Fendt 1999
Force-free electrodynamics
everywhere No accelerator gaps!
a 00
Spitkovsky 2008
a 600
35
Global currents
Timokhin 2007
Pair cascade (assumed) current
Global current solutions
They dont match!
Timokhin 2006
36
Toward a self-consistent magnetosphere
  • Can PC pair cascades generate global currents and
    screen E?
  • If not, allow component of in
    global model
  • Check output profiles, spectra with 3D radiation
    model

37
Predicted Fermi pulsar populations
Gonthier et al. 2007 Jiang Zhang 2006 Story et
al. 2007
Few radio-loud pulsars for high-altitude
accelerators
38
Summary
  • We are finally answering fundamental questions of
    g-ray pulsar astrophysics but raising new ones
  • High-energy emission comes from outer
    magnetosphere
  • Most millisecond pulsars have narrow gaps
    screening of E
  • High magnetic multiples near surface?
  • Higher E (higher masses, more compact NS)?
  • Fermi has so far detected about 48 g-ray pulsars
    - including ms pulsars many radio-quiet more
    to come!
  • Ratio of radio-loud/radio-quiet pulsars
    discriminates between high and low altitude
    accelerators
  • Measurement of light curve parameters for many
    pulsars
  • Phase-resolved spectroscopy of more sources
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com